User talk:206.214.56.81

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

TheRingess (talk) 00:49, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Siddha Yoga, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You need to stop now. — kashmīrī ^TALK 09:28, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT DEFAMATORY CONTENT? NO ONE WILL EXPLAIN ANYTHING, WHAT SENTENCE, WHAT STATEMENT, WHICH ONE, WHY, WHAT? EVERY SINGLE THING I SAID IS FACTUALLY BACKED UP BY REPUTABLE SOURCES. EVERY SINGLE THING.

Let's go with the easy example, then: a section you titled "Rape of Young Girls" but provided no concrete citations, only a mention of an open letter penned by a former swami. —C.Fred (talk) 15:37, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you, I will cite this better. I will make multiple smaller edits to make discussion easier and will cite everything claimed.

I suggest proposing the edits on the talk page and working to get consensus. Looking at the WP:ANEW case today, another editor said that they are concerned that the article has been edited heavy-handedly from both sides, so it sounds like there are editors interested in finding a solution to have the controversies covered in a manner that provides them due weight. —C.Fred (talk) 15:44, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, will do. I just removed a section that is unsupported by sources and contains original research before I saw this but I will propose future content on the talk page.

Enough. You've been warned for edit-warring and