User talk:208.82.105.200

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

May 2019

Information icon Hello, I'm Muhandes. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Fellow have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 18:00, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Purpose of citations

Hi there. Regarding

overcitation. I left the first two sources, and if you think one of the other nine is more appropriate I think you should replace it, but lets keep it at one or two sources. --Muhandes (talk) 16:49, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi, I think because they are from very-very different fields. Currently, the article implies pretty much computer industry, but it is not so. Some are in Physics, others in Climate Science, and others in Medicine. So to understand the meaning of industry fellow correctly, one needs some notion of how broad the coverage is. I am not going back and forth reversing it :))) But just thought to explain my reasons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.82.105.200 (talk) 17:03, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Citations should support the text, not decorate it. Currently, the text is quite poorly supported by the sources, and more random sources will not improve that. Find out what facts you can support with the sources, and add those, with the sources as verification. --Muhandes (talk) 21:06, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]