User talk:212.241.67.98/Archive 1

I'm not inclined to put them back in, because I don't think that they are in keeping with the apparent purpose of the article. However, you are entirely at liberty to put them back in yourself, and I would be unlikely to delete them. TheMadBaron 19:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

Here are some other hints and tips:

• I would recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)
• When using
  sign your name
  at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

If you have any questions, check out

Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Do not remove comments from others talk pages. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:48, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User Talk:Andreasegde, you will be blocked from editing. Nikzbitz ^Talk _Contribs 08:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (song), you will be blocked from editing. Brianga (talk) 17:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

I was trying to archive the talk page not vandalise it. --212.241.67.98 (talk) 17:47, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Andreasegde. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 12:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Im a bit disappointed, the one guy that opposes, i had a falling out with him a few months ago, im not saying anything but.... if you could spare some time could you give it a copyedit and write DONE, where he's failed that critera. Realist2 (talk) 19:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Believe me, I once put up Paul McCartney, and Mimi Smith for FA reviews, and they were torn to little-bitty pieces (ouch!).

One negative review is not the end. In fact, it's good, because you can never expect everyone to say yes. The decision is based upon the general mood of the review, and not the vote count. Don't let it get you down. :)--212.241.67.98 (talk) 19:28, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers when your done either cross it off the list or inform me and i will, man i so want this to get FA. Realist2 (talk) 20:14, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I crossed that requirement off the "to done" list. Your right, i really need to get in contact with that Fan club, if Thriller ges FA they will talk about it in their bulletin. I visit the site for info but dont contribute to it. Realist2 (talk) 21:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Man look how much ive done to the article, i did that critical reaction stuff all my myself this morning. I swear all this is going to kill me. Realist2 (talk) 10:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No it's not. If it passes, you will feel better than you ever have before. :)--212.241.67.98 (talk) 10:11, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, now you know why I'm on a break (apart from this, of course) because I've had two years of writing, researching and GA reviews.--212.241.67.98 (talk) 10:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol im quiting after this is over, i added "fashion acceserious" to the bottom of the influnce section. I know there is a spelling mistake, could you clean that, i dont know the spelling of the second word. Realist2 (talk) 10:28, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done it. BTW, are you American, or from somewhere else?--212.241.67.98 (talk) 10:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I live in the UK but im from south america, (as in the other continent not

I thought so, because you used the word "waffle", which is definitely Brit. I have a good friend from San Paulo called Iran do Espirito Santo who is Brazilian, his parents are Italian, and has the country Iran in his name. Confusing, or what? :)--212.241.67.98 (talk) 10:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah i eat waffles and i waffle a lot when talking. Realist2 (talk) 10:46, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting back to the point: Don't let this FA stuff get you down, as it's looking 50-50 at the moment, and you still have time. I have been through the article (90%) and have cleaned a lot of stuff, and it's still there on the review board. Take a walk, or go for a swim - it clears the head, y'know... :)--andreasegde (talk) 10:51, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

4 editers are contributed and i have completed the "to do" list of 3 of them, the other guys requests are quit challenging. I need to get these other guys back in the ring, they need to clarify there position.If ive done their list they should support. Realist2 (talk) 11:05, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea: You are right on the mark, and you are doing really well. Don't forget, be placid, and nice. FA reviews usually take a week (or more) to get sorted, so take a deep breath...--212.241.67.98 (talk) 11:38, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i just added a ton of info, it prob needs a copy edit. In not sure how to source it. It comes from audio interviews on the 2001 special edition. Realist2 (talk) 11:53, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]