User talk:3MRB1

reply button doesn't work

but edit whole page does for android app 3MRB1 (talk) 06:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

reply works on my user talk page but not elsewhere 3MRB1 (talk) 06:15, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot create my own user page , using android app ! 3MRB1 (talk) 06:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

reply button doesn't work

(edit conflict)

Moved from my tp

but edit whole page does for android app 3MRB1 (talk) 06:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just quick note, we like to keep discussions on one page, in the same thread, hence the move here. If you reply, even by editing the whole page, I will see it on my

WP:VP/T would probably be the best place to start. Post a commemt there with your issue, and someone (more than one, likely) will reply with some advice to try and assist you. Good luck and Welcome to Wikipedia - wolf 06:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot

fixed 3MRB1 (talk) 12:09, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it seems to me that there are two issues with your recent edits on Niklaus Wirth:

• 1194041223: Newly added references are not related to the preceding sentence. All references point to Kathleen Jensen (her research profile, etc.) and are irrelevant to the content (The Pascal User Manual and Report).
• 1194040847: You mention Wirth as editor, whereas the Book's TOC explicitly mentions Wirth as joint author for the first chapter and sole author for the second one.

Please consider

@

رهبرمعظم oral statement by J&W; lady in red... 3MRB1 (talk) 08:50, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Sorry I couldn't find the statement that you are referring to in the youtube video. Are you suggesting that the information in the printed book are wrong?

talk) 09:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

I think you are misunderstanding the statement: she explains the procedure of writing the documentation which was edited by Wirth. But as the book states the Reports chapter is by Wirth (See this publication). I will update the article now.

talk) 09:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@

رهبرمعظم citing the works of a person mentioned in an article is Neccessary to identify who they are 3MRB1 (talk) 15:18, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Scholarly works does not reveal much about a person except their field of research. Why not create a Wikipedia page for Jensen?

talk) 20:15, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Byt the way, you removed my notes and left the "Notes" section empty. Ignoring what the book says in favor of a misunderstanding (on your side) is no help. Please stop this edit war.

talk) 20:30, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@

رهبرمعظم I moved your note into open text 3MRB1 (talk) 20:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

I am reverting it back. The current state is just a mess:

• There is no closing parenthesis after "(also ..."
• Notes section is just empty
• The reference to the online book on Archive is removed

It should be noted that even in the video you reference, Jensen explicitly mentions that she could not write only her name in good conscious after the work that Wirth did. Stating that Wirth edited the chapter doesn't mean that he fixed grammatical and structural errors (what a Copy_editing copy editor would do)!

I can understand that you might have strong feelings that Jensen work might be understated here, but we cannot change the objective facts.

talk) 20:58, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@

رهبرمعظم looks like youare edit warring 3MRB1 (talk) 21:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

No I am not. I am informing you on every change that I make, justify it, and explain why I deem it correct. I would have appreciated it, if you did the same. I have also opened a

talk) 21:04, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@

رهبرمعظم what you have said is not the why you have acted 3MRB1 (talk) 21:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

I am not sure if I follow.

talk) 21:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@Blue Riband wp app doesnt do citoid. Jayne Currry cites prove landsman is still in business 3MRB1 (talk) 12:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 3MRB1, I restored the Lansman's Bungalow Colony after finding a better source.

There are two problems with using Jayne Curry's performance schedule to show that it is hiring entertainers and therefore still business. One, the links are about her and not abaout -=the colony. For something to have sufficient notability to be included in Wikipedia in needs broad independent coverage by sources completely independent from them. Generally speaking, if someone has difficulty finding sources to support inclusion, then that person, place, or thing isn't notable. Second, a link to a performer's schedule is going to rot very quickly. Past gigs will roll off their web pages and be replaced with new bookings.

The Brownstoner citation that you had used was advertising. It's a paid insertion and not independent. Now if a Brownstoner staff writer had written an article on how Lansman's is still going strong that's independent. Reliable sources employ fact checking and editorial oversight. Take a look at

WP:RS to learn what is considered a Reliable source. Blue Riband► 21:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

I also noticed the bare URLs in your edits. Have you tried https://citer.toolforge.org/? Just paste in the url and it formats the citation for you. (I used it to fill in the refs you just added to Marie Osmond.) Schazjmd (talk) 17:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I reverted some of your edits to the

Only one citation is needed for individual assertions in an article. See

I see that you are editing on an android. I find it difficult to use my phone to do anything other than correct the basics (typos, etc) but there are people who edit extensively on mobile platforms! See the essay by Cullen328 on smartphone editing.

If you have a question, you can add {{help me}} to your talk page, and other editors will be happy to assist you. I know that you are editing to improve Wikipedia -- that Russ Kunkel article is very poorly referenced! -- and your efforts are appreciated. Thanks, JSFarman (talk) 17:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Craig Ferguson, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suspense (1913 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Biograph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrea Savage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiatus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bigfoot

added a link pointing to Humboldt County

French fries

added a link pointing to Helical

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection

.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being

Celia Homeford (talk) 08:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Celia Homeford (talk) 08:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@

Celia Homeford stop blocking refs for Herman Livingston Rogers & Katherine L Moore 3MRB1 (talk) 08:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

It's already cited, as I told you at least twice already.

Celia Homeford (talk) 08:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@

Celia Homeford not there also section order is not wp:mos 3MRB1 (talk) 08:46, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at

Celia Homeford (talk) 09:05, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@

Celia Homeford there was no discussion your undos were based on false claims 3MRB1 (talk) 09:14, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

See

Celia Homeford (talk) 09:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@

Celia Homeford 3MRB1 (talk) 09:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Celia Homeford (talk) 09:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Celia Homeford (talk) 09:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@

Celia Homeford oh yeah forgot thanks for stalking 3MRB1 (talk) 09:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

There is currently a discussion at

Celia Homeford (talk) 09:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@

Celia Homeford cant find it 3MRB1 (talk) 10:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

The section link is

Celia Homeford (talk) 11:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Blade of the Northern Lights

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

3MRB1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

it was edits on one page and the notice was unfindable and the reverter was unclear and the reverter refused to discuss 3MRB1 (talk) 02:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for the block; I agree with the blocking admin that it actually demonstrates why you should remain blocked. 331dot (talk) 08:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not going to handle this unblock request myself, but I will say that writing an unblock request in E. E. Cummings style only bolsters my conclusions about your lack of competence to edit an encyclopedia. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On appealing a block

Hello, I've followed you from a post on

WP:CIR if possible), which maybe the direct reasons for your block. If you want to appeal your block, the appeal reason above is not so plausible. Good Luck. -Lemonaka‎ 03:13, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]