User talk:48JcL48

Hi 48JcL48! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DBaK (talk) 11:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! 48JcL48 (talk) 16:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Larrabee County, Iowa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 21:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Botswana, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

I hope I fixed it because I personally didn’t see anything wrong with it 48JcL48 (talk) (contribs) 02:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that blanking a page (like you did on Draft:Corruption in Brunei does not delete it. If you want it to be deleted, place the template {{db-g7}} on it. Thank you. Rusty4321 ^{talk contribs} 19:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC) @Rusty4321 Oh ok. Thanks ^{48JcL48talk to me} 22:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swedistan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swedistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pichpich (talk) 16:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 48JcL48, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Caden990 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, what? I am not that inexperienced. I was just trying to help him out. I asked something on the Teahouse and I saw his name, he was asking a question, so I went to his profile and I felt bad that his draft kept getting declined so I added sources for him. Is it because I submitted the draft for him? I’m not that dumb to use sockpuppets. ^48JCLTalk 21:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Our editing methods are very different. My articles and drafts have multiple sources, he usually bases it off of a main source. Seriously, in what way are we the same? Take a look at my WIP page at Draft:List of elections in Botswana ^48JCLTalk 21:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You’re an admin, right? I’m sure you’re able to do a checkuser, or whatever it’s called. ^48JCLTalk 21:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Needing help with my first article

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lil%27_Cory# Wolfvillage (talk) 22:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is js citation errors ^48JCLTalk 01:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is my first article. I know it could pass if I fix the error Wolfvillage (talk) 01:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the Wikipedia policy on

Oh. was the Dexerto one somewhat reliable? 48JCLTalk 20:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you didn't read any of the links I provided, I'll quote

WP:RSPS to you:

Dexerto is a website covering gaming news, internet personalities, and entertainment. Editors agree that it is a tabloid publication that rarely engages in serious journalism; while it may be used as a source on a case-by-case basis (with some editors arguing for the reliability of its esports coverage), it is usually better to find an alternative source, and it is rarely suitable for use on BLPs or to establish notability.

Schazjmd (talk) 20:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Is this a reliable source? https://poptopic.com.au/article/youtuber-airrack-exposed-as-a-fraud-and-douchebag/ ^48JCLTalk 20:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I personally don’t see anything wrong with it ^48JCLTalk 20:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like tabloid clickbait to me, but as far as I can tell, it hasn't been discussed by the community before. You're welcome to start a discussion at

WP:RSN and get consensus on whether that's a reliable source for a BLP. Schazjmd (talk) 20:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Also, keep in mind that just because something is published, that doesn't mean it's significant enough to mention in an encyclopedia article. Unless this accusation/denial gets more widespread coverage in mainstream sources, it's probably

WP:UNDUE. Schazjmd (talk) 20:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]