User talk:65.78.144.196

• Please use
  block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism
  .
• Cluebot produces very few
  false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here
  , remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning:
  talk) 07:20, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Technically, you're right, it was the wrong template - I've fixed it.

Dreadstar ☥ 08:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to Help talk:Edit summary. Earlypsychosis (talk) 08:36, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

65.78.144.196 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

That guy was being an asshole. If a person accuses me of something, aren't I allowed to argue against it? Fuck. You guys are all treating me like shit just because I'm new. That's depressing. If you're really gonna play like that, I guess I can refrain from editing this thing, and only read it, but man... The elitism on here is just disgusting.

Decline reason:

You should read our guide to appealing blocks before making an unblock request. You apparently had not done so. NJA (t/c) 09:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think I am, but I don't feel like editing crap to test...

Ah well, I'll figure out later. 65.78.144.196 (talk) 05:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]