User talk:73.123.30.85

Hello, and

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (73.123.30.85) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a

Happy editing! -BigDwiki ^talk 22:37, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. ABH95 (talk) 20:27, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mr Blobby (song); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Hb1290 (talk) 01:07, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:10, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Fine. You win. --73.123.30.85 (talk) 21:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:10, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

73.123.30.85 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The incident that got this IP and another banned is in the past now, and I do not want to have it happen again. I am sorry for my non-apology in a previous unblock request, and I will never get involved in an edit war again. 73.123.30.85 (talk) 00:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I think that the best way for you to show us that you will abide by guidelines is to observe the rest of this block, so we know that you will stop attempting to evade the block. 331dot (talk) 08:54, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You're not blocked for a single incident; you're blocked for a months-long pattern of edit-warring, mostly from the 2601 range described below.

Previous declined unblocks from other IPs in this blocked range:

User_talk:2601:199:4181:E00:49B4:9716:A7D1:F663 (declined February 28, 2021)

User_talk:2601:199:4181:E00:6DDA:7E9F:7484:C5C8 (declined February 28, 2021)

Edit warring and been warned on a large variety of articles, including:

[1] (edit warring on The Final Countdown (song)

[2] (edit-warring on CJOH-DT)

[3] (edit-warring on several articles).

This list goes on. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've learned from my mistake. I do not want to get involved in such an edit war again. It was wrong to do so. --73.123.30.85 (talk) 00:24, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're right; you won't be involved in any edit wars for the next three months. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't want to get taunted, I wanted to ask politely for an unblock. --73.123.30.85 (talk) 00:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]