User talk:81.106.93.227

This is 81.106.93.227's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paulette Arochena (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paulette Arochena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 11:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 81.106.93.227! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 11:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paulette Arochena (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sorry, no indication of notability under

WP:NARTIST

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paulette Arochena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 11:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Thanks for message.

If you have a

conflict of interest, you must declare it. Please don't write about yourself

, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below:

When you write about a person, you must provide
independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines for creative professionals
. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.

although you give references, they are not appropriate. One "'Made in Coventry' children's book by writer, Aaron Ashmore" isn't a reference at all, and the rest include social media, a book sales site, her website, and a couple of interviews on local news sites, none are indepedent third-party sources. Finding references isn't just a matter of sticking on any mention of her.

You already have two messages above saying she isn't notable. She appears to have been one of several people who illustrated a book (although your text doesn't actually tell us that). I don't know if she is a full-time professional, but even if she is, she's just doing her job, there is absolutely nothing to suggest that she meets any of the notability criteria I've linked above.

You must write in a
non-promotional
tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

Your single sentence article seems to be just a namecheck that doesn't tell jus anything useful.

There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.

You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in
this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here
; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

I didn't check.

This isn't social media, where you can write what you like. This is the third time you have been told that she isn't notable enough for a Wikipedia article, and no amount of low-quality references will change that.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find

conflict of interest, and you must disclose the nature of that COI. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply

]