User talk:92.0.126.49

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

92.0.126.49 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe that this block is unneccesary, as it falsely assumes that I am related to dannyboy1209 92.0.126.49 (talk) 09:21, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It wouldn't be a good idea to permit anonymous editing from this ip while User:Dannyboy1209 is using it. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:20, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You told us yourself that this is your IP. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:50, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I need this account to show you that I am ready to be unblocked. You said it yourself that having multiple accounts was ok. I wish to have my account unblocked by March. This is a temporary account until that happens. 92.0.126.49 (talk) 16:42, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would be very surprised if anyone told you that it was okay to edit while blocked. It is not. Because you altered my response to falsely make it appear that I had accepted it, and because I don't feel like closely monitoring this page to revert any future forgeries, I have disabled your ability to use this talk page. You really are blocked from using Wikipedia. Stop trying, and find a different hobby. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:07, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]