User talk:AARSOMEONE

Rules for my talk page

1. I have actually read these rules before entering 2. I am not a bot 3. Do not spam 4. Do not talk unless it is related to Wikimedia Foundation or Fandom/Ganepedia 5. Strictly no swearing, cussing, toxicity, etc. to other talkers and me 6. Strictly no relationship debates. This means no political talk, arguments between members, etc. We want this place to be about one subject 7. Strictly no gore or porn

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:AARSOMEONE/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:AARSOMEONE/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AARSOMEONE! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Murder of Jessica Ridgeway. -- ferret (talk) 00:57, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators:

IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- ferret (talk) 18:23, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

AARSOMEONE (talk) 03:01, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've already been told how to appeal. -- ferret (talk) 12:45, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know but still I can't appeal yet AARSOMEONE (talk) 01:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? -- ferret (talk) 01:27, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

30 day wait :| AARSOMEONE (talk) 05:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're talking about. There is no "30-day" wait for making unblock appeals. -- ferret (talk) 16:46, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. There's not a lot for me to go on beyond the account creation date and the checkuser block. If this is not the user's original account, any unblock request should be via that account. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:17, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra This is the account they should be appealing on, however, that... wasn't an appeal. -- ferret (talk) 23:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferret: No. It was not. Pretty standard for UTRS, though. I gave them my standard decline. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:02, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you're using your talk page inappropriately while blocked, your access has been revoked. -- ferret (talk) 00:56, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. That did not follow my advice at all. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.