User talk:Aardvarkzz
This user may have left Wikipedia. Aardvarkzz has not edited Wikipedia since April 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Aardvarkzz, and
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
{{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Flowanda | Talk 07:33, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your edits to this page! I think you are doing positive work on a page I have spent a lot of time working on. I looked at your User page (at User:Aardvarkzz) and it looks like you could use some advice. Your userpage can be seen by everyone, even by people who don't have Wikipedia accounts! I would not recommend putting sensitive or private information on your user page. I would stay away from giving your real name and where you live (saying which state you are from is fine, even city, if you live in a big place). Take a look at other people's user pages (here is mine: User:JEN9841) to see what other people use their user pages for.
The user page is where you can tell other Wikipedians about yourself, what types of articles you edit, and your general thoughts about Wikipedia. Technically anyone can edit someone's user page (unless its been protected), but it is common courtesy to not edit other people's user pages (its usually very much frowned upon; any outside edits would practically be vandalism). The pages you are allowed to edit are the user talk pages, which is the kind I am writing on now. My user talk page is at User talk:JEN9841). Feel free to make a new section on my user talk page to communicate with me.
Thank you again!
Also never forget to sign after you write on talk pages or discussion pages of articles with four tildes (~), as this signs your name with the date...it ends up looking like this: JEN9841 (talk) 07:00, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- It is superb to have an actual expert on the topic working on this page. As you can probably tell, I am no film expert, just a fan, and I think your position/opinion would take precedence over mine on anything with regards to this article. If you see any film on this entry that is not in the public domain, please promptly remove it. Also, you may have seen already on the talk page {Talk:List of films in the public domain in the United States}, but I removed a large amount of films that I could not find citations for and moved them to a subpage under my namespace, at User:JEN9841/List of films in the public domain. With your added resources, if you can find a citation for them, it would be great to have them added back to this list as a film that is in the public domain. JEN9841 (talk) 16:29, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
You may disagree, but I'm not sure that this article meets guidelines for inclusion. Take a look at
Table re-formatting of List of films in the public domain in the United States
Thank you for your concern with this article. While I still would prefer to change the article to a table under namespace and, once complete, move it to article space, the way it is currently being transerred, though not ideal in my opinion, is still acceptable. As for your concern about information in the table that is not directly relevant to a film's PD status, one of the most important aspects of having list articles (as opposed to mere categories) is that more information can be conveyed to the reader. This information, as you point out, may or may not be directly relevant to the subject of the article. Once the table is complete, unnecessary columns can be removed (it is a good idea to defer, at least initially, to have more columns than less, as it is much easier to remove something than add it later).
I have actually taken part in the transfer, as I have already moved all of the "B" titled films into table format. Your added information to the list was very helpful in putting the info in the table. If you like, you can also begin transferring the work into the table.JEN9841 (talk) 14:45, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Re: Your AIV report on 71.49.85.160
Thank you for your report on 71.49.85.160 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and you are encouraged to revert, warn and report inappropriate conduct. I have however declined to act on this report for the following reason:
Appears to be a shared IP address, used by multiple users. That means they are most probably completely separate people.
The Guide to administrator intervention against vandalism might be a helpful read if you wish to improve your future reports. If you have further questions, please don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Cheers! -- Luk talk 06:50, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Message added 07:27, 27 September 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Message added 11:47, 28 September 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Unruly numbers of cats
If you want more cats, what is wrong with this edit? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:50, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of The Irish Filmography
I have nominated The Irish Filmography, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Irish Filmography. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:58, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
I an honored to award you The Editor's Barnstar in appreciation of your diligent efforts and work in bringing The Irish Filmography to Wikipedia and sharing knowledge with others. I have myself been involved in expanding and sourcing the article since it was sent to AFD and invite you to look in and advise about any errors I might have made. Happy Holidays, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:57, 22 December 2009 (UTC) |
And if you have a moment...
Inspired by your article, I have begun User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox/Kevin Rockett. Care to join in the fun?
- Very happy you looked in. Thank you and Happy Holidays! Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:08, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
DYK for The Irish Filmography
Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject Films January 2010 Newsletter
The
Speedy deletion nomination of Judith Paige Mitchell
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Stroppolotalk 21:07, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, I did not see the Under Construction tag on the article. I removed the CSD tag. --Stroppolotalk 21:09, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject Films February 2010 Newsletter
The
Peter Graves (actor)
I noticed that you inserted a few references that were in the following form: "Obituary (name of publication as internal link) (date of publication)." I had to remove them because readers expect such references to be external links to the online form of the actual articles. Here's a few tips you might want to consider: (1) Find the actual article online. Make sure you collect the piece's ENTIRE web address (http://...). (2) When you're on the edit workpage of the entry you're attempting to alter, use the "<ref/ref>" icon, which is the one at the far right above the text screen. Activating it will provide you with the basic format for references. Next, erase "Insert footnote text here" and tap the External links icon, which is fourth from the left with the planet Earth on it. This will automatically give you the proper format for you to type in the article's ENTIRE web address. (3) When you're finished editing, what needs to appear in the link name are the author's name (if available), the complete title of the article, the publication's name italicized and the date it appeared in print form (or the date it appeared online if the former is not expressed). Here's an example:[1]
The only time I can think of when references aren't in the form of external links is when the text of the cited sources are not available online, such as actual books, publications from long time ago, match programs/magazines from sports entities, etc.
Please consult the information provided by Wikipedia because they are the ultimate authority on this matter and can explain everything better than I could. I, myself, have been the beneficiary of a few good tutorials from fellow editors. Your efforts in editing are appreciated because they make life a lot more easier for the rest of us. Best of luck in all future endeavors! The Ink Daddy! (talk) 02:55, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Reply from The Ink Daddy!
My first apology is having forgotten to sign my previous comment above. It was purely accidental. I guess I was too preoccupied with NCAA Division I Men's Basketball tournament brackets, filling out the Census form, doing research on my book, etc.
I checked throughout Wikipedia to find the information relevant to this dilemna and found it in Wikipedia:Inline citation. First, you are correct that there are no strict requirements for using them. Second, you make an outstanding point that lots of external links go dead after a certain period of time. This is especially true with articles from Tribune Company-owned newspapers, which pains me greatly because I'm a reader of The Baltimore Sun. One exception is The New York Times, whose articles have some staying power, except for the ones from the 1960s through the early-1980s which have a price tag attached to them.
I was thinking along the lines of how to best serve the readers of Wikipedia. I strongly feel that it is important for the entries to be as informative and professional-looking as possible, considering that Wikipedia's reputation is always being questioned. By no means was I trying to be condescending.
I was originally going to comment on the contentious nature of your correspondence, but I remembered that I was exactly like that when I started, and boy do I regret it. Then again, I guess it's all part of the learning process. I do respect you for challenging my comments & actions because it forced me to learn more about the details behind Wikipedia.
What you were doing was correct, and I apologize for my actions. Just as a modest suggestion, you might want to mention the author's name and the exact title of the article in your references, too. Just a modest suggestion. The Ink Daddy! (talk) 02:55, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Template:Recent death
Hi. Please see the template instructions for {{recent death}}. The template is not supposed to be used on every biography of recently deceased individuals. Only on very heavily edited articles. Rettetast (talk) 20:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject Films March 2010 Newsletter
The
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Chris Limahelu, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://articles.latimes.com/2010/apr/07/local/la-me-passings8-2010apr08. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on
WP:FILMS April Newsletter
The
Articles for deletion nomination of The Man Outside (disambiguation)
I have nominated The Man Outside (disambiguation), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Man Outside (disambiguation). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Airplaneman ✈ 01:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
May 2010
WP:FILMS May 2010 Newsletter
The
Just to let you know....
An article you had written May 2, 2010 about
Talkback
Message added 09:18, 22 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
WP:FILMS June 2010 Newsletter
The
WP:FILMS July 2010 Newsletter
The
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Man Outside (disambiguation)
Hey Aardvarkzz, I was sifting through my contributions and noticed this AFD I filed a few months ago. I came by to say that I have learned since then to not tag articles so early :). Sorry about that. Anyway, I wasn't pleased to be called a "BUSYBODY" either. Ugh. I donate tons of my time here and that's the last thing I want. Oh well. Could you also point me to the "one hour policy" you were referring to? Thanks, and no hard feelings, Airplaneman ✈ 00:01, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- You can find that advice at Wikipedia:New pages patrol#Patrolling new pages, where it states
- Especially if the new article has a {{newpage}} tag).
- Especially if the new article has a {{
- I also suggest you read Wikipedia:Give an article a chance.Aardvarkzz (talk) 20:52, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to respond. I have read the links. Take care, Airplaneman ✈ 21:29, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
License tagging for File:The Irish Filmography 300px wide.jpg
Thanks for uploading
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:06, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Irish Filmography.jpg
- I agree that page numbers and items from the obituaries would be worthwhile additions. However, the sources I'm using don't have the original page numbers readily available. Quoting from the obits is something I intend to add later. If you want to quote from the obits now, that will be a welcome contribution. Email me if you need help finding the source material.Aardvarkzz (talk) 04:13, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for the message. You wrote: "...VARIETY OBITS: An Index to Obituaries in Variety by Jeb H. Perry. It ends at June 21, 1978, so I’ve used it to put in some page numbers. I’ll go back later to fill in some I missed."
Thanks. But please note that a bare citation, while helpful, is not as useful as a *discussion* of what the obit says. If the obit discusses this person's life, tell us what the obit says, and if there are any interesting quotes, you can quote them. For an excellent celebrity Biography article that uses sources well, see, for example,
You also wrote: "After I made my initial reply to you on my userpage, did the notice "You have new messages (last change)" appear to you the next time you logged in? ... advise me how to notify someone that I have replied to them on my user page....
No, because I do not watch your talk page. The best way to reply to someone is on their talk page. You can copy the message on your talk page also if you want to retain the conversation all in one place. Best regards! -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:05, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Notice of discussion re: potential linkspam to "Variety"
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at
WP:FILMS August 2010 Newsletter
The
WP:FILM September Election Nomination Period Open
The
Explantion requested for wikilinking
As you are adding numerous
- "I ask you to instruct User: Wikiwatcher1 to tolerate their presence in articles about movies and celebrities." That's not how this kind of thing works. It looks like you're adding extraneous references to articles. Why are you doing that? If the information is already verified (remember that leads don't need citations if they draw on verified material in the rest of the article), then adding citations to your pet references is pointless make-work. If those references actually have new information, then by all means add it to the articles and use a reference, but don't add hundreds or thousands of references to articles just for the sake of it. Fences&Windows 23:33, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Wikibooks, Wikimania, etc.
You are aware that Wikimedia foundation is behind these site just like it is behind wikipedia? Weaponbb7 (talk) 15:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
WP:FILMS September 2010 Newsletter
The
Categories
- First, WHY do you disguise your user name as "Span" when you are, in fact, Baltimore Sunobituary. READ that obituary and you will agree that he was Catholic.
- I have undone your disruptive editing deletions of the Category:American Roman Catholics for Young and Sullivan -- you deleted them again. This is fair warning that if I encounter any further such disruptive editing by you, I will post a complaint against you with Wikipedia.Aardvarkzz (talk) 20:56, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Firstly, in response, my name is not a disguise, it a signature, see talk) 00:05, 15 October 2010 (UTC)]
- Firstly, in response, my name is not a disguise, it a signature, see
Loretta Young
Hi. In the future, please do not re-add categories regarding religion without citing a
WP:FILM October 2010 Newsletter
The Octoberr 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:37, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
WP:FILM November 2010 Newsletter
The November 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:50, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
WP:FILM December 2010 Newsletter
The December 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:59, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
WP:FILM January 2011 Newsletter
The January 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Kyron
FYI - I have started a new article,
- I’m glad that someone has restored a page on this highly publicized case. There are people in the Wikipedia hierarchy that have a penchant for deleting pages on all but the most famous kidnap-murder victims, even those cases receiving widespread reportage. You appear to have started from scratch, even though there was lots of material in the previous article. Possibly it is unwise to ask the administrator who deleted that article to restore the material someplace where you can selectively add it back to your new article, as that administrator might delete your new article; if that’s not a problem, then why not ask?
Possibly you remember the case of Somer Thompson, who was kidnapped and murdered in 2009; her page was deleted too, despite lots of articles about her and her murderer. How does one go about appealing the unwarranted deletion of such articles?Aardvarkzz (talk) 00:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC)- The original article was deleted because the subject of the article was Kyron himself, i.e. it was a biography of Kyron. Since Kyron is only notable for one event, he falls under spill the beans 00:47, 9 February 2011 (UTC)]
- The original article was deleted because the subject of the article was Kyron himself, i.e. it was a biography of Kyron. Since Kyron is only notable for one event, he falls under
WP:FILM February 2011 Newsletter
The February 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
WP:FILM March 2011 Newsletter
The March 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:06, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
WP:FILM April 2011 Newsletter
The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:34, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
WP:FILM May 2011 Newsletter
The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
WP:FILM June 2011 Newsletter
The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:28, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
WP:FILM July 2011 Newsletter
The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:28, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
WP:FILM September 2011 Newsletter
The September 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 16:35, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
2011 WikiProject Film coordinator election
Voting for WikiProject Film's October 2011
WP:FILM October 2011 Newsletter
The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 15:00, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Film November 2011 Newsletter
The March 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:35, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Eureka Stockade 1949.jpg
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a helpme}}
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:04, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Doe Avedon, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Model and Jigsaw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Film December 2011 Newsletter
The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:00, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Richard Sylbert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unconditional Love (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Film's January–February Newsletter
The January 2012 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the distribution list. GRAPPLE X 00:35, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Holiday cheer
Holiday Cheer | ||
Happy New Year , whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings.
|
Disambiguation link notification for December 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Sylbert, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tequila Sunrise and Shoot to Kill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Nomination of Steffi Sidney for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steffi Sidney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steffi Sidney until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 18:35, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
You are invited to participate in the here !
|
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!
Greetings!
You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.
This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.
Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!
If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.
On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:
- Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
- Country Winners
- Diversity winner
- High quality contributors
- Gender-gap fillers
- Page improvers
- Wikidata Translators
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)
AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October!
Greetings!
After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.
The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.
On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:
- Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
- Diversity winner
- Gender-gap fillers
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)