User talk:Admshiloh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

I have discontinued participating. --AdmShiloh - Hawk 21:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of STARFLEET Command

I have nominated STARFLEET Command, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STARFLEET Command. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. --EEMIV (talk) 14:48, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of
STARFLEET International Conference

A

its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 14:18, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 14:18, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanks for your contributions. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:17, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eric A. Stillwell

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Eric A. Stillwell, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non Notable TV producer. A spell as as president of Starfleet: The International Star Trek Fan Association does not confer Notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Springnuts (talk) 18:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The

talk) 21:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of STARFLEET International Conference

STARFLEET International Conference, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STARFLEET International Conference. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --EEMIV (talk) 01:51, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

File:Mh001.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 13:37, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

File source problem with File:Mh003.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Mh003.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

48 hours after 02:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
]


Image permission problem with Image:Sfbanner.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Sfbanner.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the
    this list
    ) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
    here
    .

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:23, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Radiologo.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Radiologo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 02:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wfhulogo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

File source problem with File:Hardeman1.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Hardeman1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

48 hours after 02:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

File source problem with File:Milansitka.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Milansitka.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

48 hours after 02:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

File source problem with File:Rymantabserm1922.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Rymantabserm1922.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

48 hours after 02:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

File source problem with File:Radiologo.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Radiologo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

T • C • L) 01:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiProject Star Trek

Hello, Admshiloh, this message is being sent to inform you that, due to over two years editing inactivity, your username has been taken off of the list of Wikipedia Project Star Trek active conributers. If you have returned to active editing Wikipedia, please re add your name to the list of active contributers. Thank you, -- Alpha Quadrant (talk) 16:36, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 21:48, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 21:54, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010





To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the

talk) 20:14, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 15:07, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 21:05, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 01:07, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 21:44, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 21:58, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,

talk) 22:22, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,

talk) 21:24, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Military Historian of the Year

Nominations for the "

]

Military history coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the projectwhat coordinators do) 08:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Starfleet Command (fan group)

The article

Starfleet Command (fan group) has been proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. No references. No independent sources. Tagged for notability since 2008.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~KvnG 03:17, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Starfleet Command (fan group)
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Starfleet Command (fan group) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starfleet Command (fan group) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:25, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from

[majestic titan] 22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from

[majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Official Star Trek Fan Club has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this organization passes

WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:50, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
]