User talk:AktiNo

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

-- RP459 ^Talk/_{Contributions} 23:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:29, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

Thanks for your aircraft number updates to the RuAF article. However if you're using different sources, you must, please, remove the earlier references. Right now it appears, for example, that the reference now there would support ~44 new attack helicopters, while it only refers to 40. Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 21:44, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This still applies today to your recent edits. Scr★pIron^IV 22:03, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Everything done right. AktiNo (talk)

Hi, can you pls refer change of status of Boevoy destroyer? I havn´t any info about its decommission. It should be still laid down and wait for overhaul and modernization same as all units of this project. THX --Hornet24 (talk) 09:55, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Decommissioned. Beyond repair in view of the complexity and the cost of repair of the propulsion system. Overview 100% of the employee's rights to the Pacific Fleet, to find a formal reference in the network to the fact, and could not ...

Now the Navy ships including 7 It is true that the course of 7 destroyers have only 3 ...:

• • Bystryy - Active
  • Bespokoynyy - All systems are in order, but is not currently running, engine problems, because in the 90s to regularly for parts to "Nastoychivyy"
  • Nastoychivyy - Active
  • Admiral Ushakov - Active
  • Boevoy - decommissioned ! ( Looked fresh photo ship, the verdict - to be scrapped )
  • Burnyy ( is placed in the repair to "Dalzavod" But once it was there for 8 years!)
  • Bezboyaznennyy ( and before that there were trying to fix the "fearless", but move back and did not work!)
  • Gremyashchiy ( the name assigned to the first Project 20385 corvette ...)

draw your own conclusions ...

Hi, pls, can you use reference to all major changes which you make at wikipedia? It is very hard to check all your changes (at Russian navy ship list) and it waste my time which i then can´t used for other work. THX

P.S.: Pls answer me here about your understanding!!! Hornet24 Hornet24 (talk) 04:32, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AktiNo, you *MUST* provide references when requested, in accordance with

WP:Reliable Source. *Unreferenced* changes are not permitted when somebody has requested sources. Please use the article talkpage to discuss your differences with Hornet24. I am going to roll-back your edits, and lock the page for two weeks, to allow you two to come to a consensus. Regards Buckshot06 (talk) 06:32, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

You need to provide references for your edits to Voronezh radar Secretlondon (talk) 07:22, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Ok, I do it, but more later
  • You changed figures cited to reliable sources, kept the original references (which backed up the other figures) and then referenced a random blog. This isn't good enough. You removed the planned replacement of the Daryal radar at Pechora. If they really have decided not to replace that you need a good source, and we need to talk about the change in the article. You can't just cut the text. I've included the TASS reference for Barnaul but I've had to revert most of your additions. You cannot change figures and keep the original references. Referencing is everything - in Wikipedia things do not have to be correct, they have to be verifiable. Secretlondon (talk) 19:19, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Russian Naval Aviation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transport aircraft (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Surveillance aircraft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Il-18 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lada Kalina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Universal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of active Russian Navy ships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pacific Fleet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, I'm Northamerica1000. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sukhoi Su-35 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AktiNo. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AktiNo. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AktiNo. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AktiNo. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]