User talk:AlbertGray

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Bianca Montgomery

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. Your edits are very welcome, but you can't copy from soapcentral or any other website, as that's a copyright violation. If you want to rewrite Bianca's history in your own words, please do so. User:Zoe|(talk) 01:38, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Stephanie

Please see Talk:Stephanie Douglas Forrester. I've noticed you've written a fair deal of soap character articles...I may have to go through them to see if they're in the same tone as that article. If they are, I'll have to put cleanup tags on them too. Mike H. That's hot 04:15, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome!

Hello, AlbertGray, and

welcome
to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Mkamensek (talk) -The LeftOverChef 13:24, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Soap opera characters

Hi. I see that you're adding a bunch of articles for soap opera characters. Thanks for contributing to the project but I think you should take a look at

our guidelines for inclusion of articles on fictional characters. I feel that your additions don't conform to it and will end up being deleted. Pascal.Tesson 12:25, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanks

Just a note of thanks for starting the article on the Designing Women character, Kendall Dobbs. Had you not started the article, I would not have been up to expanding it. I really appreciate it. It was a lot of fun adding to it. :) Have a nice day -- Flummery 21:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for another perspective...

I thought I'd ask you about this, since you must also have seen "Killing All the Right People" a decent number of times. I was checking Google for more information about the episode when I found this site. I know it's not a big deal, but I was really surprised that some people looked at the episode that way. Let me quote the part I'm talking about:

"In 1987, as part of its second season, CBS's Southern woman-centered sitcom Designing Women explicitly drew the connection between heterosexual problem and homosexual culpability. [...]
Mary Jo argued for condoms only as a means of protecting children, not as a way to stop the spread of AIDS, which the episode tacitly connected with promiscuous homosexual behavior. Thus, as Emile Netzhamme and Scott Shamp observe, even though Kendall is portrayed as sweet, well adjusted, and sympathetic, the episode subtly blames his homosexuality for his fatal condition."

I guess I just wanted to ask you if I'm missing something here? It seemed obvious to me that the entire point of the episode was to disprove the reasoning behind the bigotry directed at homosexuals with AIDS. Mary Jo did argue for condoms as a means to prevent AIDS; that was her biggest motivation for participating in the debate. Of course, she was arguing for it as protection for children, not adults, but that was the point of the debate—condoms being supplied in schools. Mary Jo also remarks at the debate that AIDS is a disease Kendall got before he knew what it was or how to prevent it. It's stated that anyone can get AIDS and that no one knew how it got started. I felt the episode showed great sympathy for everyone who died from AIDS or was living with it. I just don't see this "explicit connection between heterosexual problem and homosexual culpability." Do you see it? Thanks for your time. :) --Flummery 18:34, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Puzzled by something

I'm puzzled by your removal of cleanup tags from all of the Fashion House character articles. All of them are purely fictional biography written in an in-universe perspective, making the tag appropriate, so I'm surprised to see them all removed without so much as a question as to why I put them there.

Phil Sandifer 06:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC) Because, I took three days to edit them and cleaned them up to conform to the fictional standards. Hence then I removed the tags.[reply
]

William Chandler?

When is it revealed that William Chandler setup Tania? This is not explicated in the Fashion House finale...

To answer, he was the one who did the deed, and then he and Sophia, as far as I know, planted the gun on Tania. Then it was she who confessed to the crime. he was also the one who told the district attorney, that she confessed to the crime, which could easily set things like that in motion. As I said, that is what I possibly think happened, and it is open to speculation. Also, I fixed all the articles up to conform to the fictional angle, as was told, and I removed the tags after they were finished. It took me a good three days to do so.

Lance Miller is NOT a pharmacist!

Apparently someone seems to think that the character of Lance Miller is a pharmacist, because this is about the fourth time, I have had to remove a line saying that he was the world's best pharmacist.

Let me clear the air here. For one; Lance Miller is a fictional character on a telenovela called Fashion House! Secondly, even on the show, he wasn't a pharmacist, he was an accountant, and a crooked one at that; and third, he was killed on the show.

So, I am kindly asking, whoever is putting in that article that he is a pharmacist to stop, because he was not a pharmacist, and never would be; because he is merely a fictional character and a dead one at that. —The preceding

unsigned comment was added by AlbertGray (talk • contribs) 12:00, 9 December 2006 (UTC).[reply
]

WP:FICT

Greetings. I've stumbled across a number of your articles and wanted to call your attention, if you haven't already read it, to

WP:FICT. I think that for example the article on the TV series Harper Valley PTA would benefit very much from including a list of characters and perhaps a separate article with brief descriptions of the characters. However, each character should not have his or her own individual article. Otto4711 20:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Question about Orlando

Hi! Sorry to bother you, but I noticed that you live in Orlando. I was wondering if you had been to either of these dinner shows and could recommend one. We will be visiting Orlando soon. A magic show here or a hypo-comedy show here. You can respond here. Thanks! Reywas92Talk 19:27, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arlaine Wright

I have added a "{{

prod}}" template to the article Arlaine Wright, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 08:26, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Brandon Buddy/AfD

Hi, I just recreated a page for Brandon Buddy (Cole Thornhart) of One Life to Live, which apparently has been previously deleted at least once due to "lack of notability." Obviously, he is a new actor, but his status as a contract player on OLTL makes him notable, no? In any case, I was hoping you and others who have contributed to OLTL pages could comment on the article's talk page regarding this deletion issue. Thanks in advance. TAnthony 04:25, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tense of plot summaries within articles

  • Hello, AlbertGray, I made tiny changes to your edits to the Josh Madden article, as you can see with these two links...[1][2]...because even though a lot of plot summaries of fictional character or fictional event articles are worded in past-tense, present-tense is preferred for plot summaries on Wikipedia, as also seen with this internal link...Wikipedia:WikiProject_Soap_Operas#Tense. The Josh Madden article's plot summary is worded in present-tense, so your edits needed to be changed to present-tense as well. As for an article's plot summary that is worded in past-tense, well, then it's perfectly okay to make edits to that article's plot summary that are past-tense also.

Anyway, I'll see you around on Wikipedia. And don't forget to sign your posts after commenting and or resonding to another editor on a talk page at Wikipedia. If you don't know already, all you have to do to sign your posts on Wikipedia is type four tildes...~~~~...without the periods, of course.

Flyer22 20:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion of
Cory Smith

CSD a7
.

Under the

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon
}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Rocket000 07:01, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Babe Carey

I undid your edits to the

Flyer22 19:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Tense of plot summaries

AlbertGray, I keep changing the tiny edit you keep making to the Josh Madden article's plot summary, in the way of tense, because Wikipedia's plot summaries should be in present tense, as is addressed in this link: Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas#Tense. I know that link states preferred. But a good (or great) formatting style for Wikipedia is considered to be when an article's plot summary is worded in present tense. To read up on more of that, you can click on this link. I was opposed to it at first as well, but now it seems really right to me, perhaps because I'm used to it now. But having the plot in present tense, with the year in which it happened if it's a soap opera (though years are not usually needed for present tense of film plot summaries), as to clarify that it's not happening now makes a lot of sense, considering that just as if watching a movie, a television show, or a play, it really does seem as though it's happening as you read.

I'll eventually get around to writing the other All My Children plot summaries in present tense as well. What is happening in Josh's plot summary is supposed to be as though the reader is watching that now, like a movie. Stating "and is acrimonious towards

Flyer22 15:53, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Now that I look up on your talk page, it's clear that I've already told you about this before, though not in this much detail at that time. Try to abide by it this time.
Flyer22 16:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Caroline Pierce

A

db-author}} to the top of Caroline Pierce. Pastordavid (talk) 18:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of Mrs. Griggs

I have nominated Mrs. Griggs, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mrs. Griggs. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. — Coren (talk) 05:09, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Miss Elsie Thornton

An article that you have been involved in editing, Miss Elsie Thornton, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Elsie Thornton. Thank you. MovieMadness (talk) 16:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ida Morgenstern

A

Ida Morgenstern. Ridernyc (talk) 02:17, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Martin Morgenstern

A

Martin Morgenstern. Ridernyc (talk) 02:18, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Ted Baxter

A

db-author}} to the top of Ted Baxter. Ridernyc (talk) 02:22, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Georgette Franklin Baxter

A

Georgette Franklin Baxter. Ridernyc (talk) 02:22, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Phyllis Lindstrom

A

db-author}} to the top of Phyllis Lindstrom. Ridernyc (talk) 02:23, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Sue Ann Nivens

A

db-author}} to the top of Sue Ann Nivens. Ridernyc (talk) 02:23, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Murray Slaughter

A

Murray Slaughter. Ridernyc (talk) 02:24, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

David Baxter

A

db-author}} to the top of David Baxter. Ridernyc (talk) 02:25, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Edie Grant

A

Edie Grant. Ridernyc (talk) 02:25, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Gordy Howard

A

Gordy Howard. Ridernyc (talk) 02:26, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Bess Lindstrom

A

Bess Lindstrom. Ridernyc (talk) 02:26, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Flo Meredith

A

Flo Meredith. Ridernyc (talk) 02:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Dottie Richards

A

Dottie Richards. Ridernyc (talk) 02:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Walter Richards

A

db-author}} to the top of Walter Richards. Ridernyc (talk) 02:28, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Marie Slaughter

A

Marie Slaughter. Ridernyc (talk) 02:28, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]


Speedy deletion of Olivia Brandeis "Brandy" Henderson"

criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies
.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Master of Puppets Care to share? 03:45, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flagging Winifred Freedman for further review

Hello, AlbertGray … I recently encountered the article about

violates a copyright
.

I am considering tagging

Deletion policy
… I do not have time to examine the article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

I do not mean to imply that your contribution is unappreciated … perhaps you should read

Your first article … and remember, there was a time when I knew less about how Wikipedia works than you know right now, and I am always available to help you become a more proactive contributor. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 17:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Winifred Freedman

A

db-author}} to the top of Winifred Freedman. — 72.75.72.63 (talk) 02:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Ken Matthews

Another editor has added the {{

prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of
Maria Gianni

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Clubjuggle T/C 12:58, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of
Lexi Walker

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Clubjuggle T/C 13:00, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of
Michelle Randall Miller

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Clubjuggle T/C 13:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of
Luke Gianni

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Clubjuggle T/C 13:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of
Tania Ford

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Clubjuggle T/C 13:03, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of
Sophia Blakely

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Clubjuggle T/C 13:05, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of
Eddie Zarouvian

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Clubjuggle T/C 13:05, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of John Cotter

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Clubjuggle T/C 13:06, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of
Harold and Hans

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Clubjuggle T/C 13:07, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of
Lance Miller

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Clubjuggle T/C 13:07, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of
Gloria Thompson

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Clubjuggle T/C 13:08, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Michael Bauer

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Clubjuggle T/C 13:08, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of
Nikki Clark

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Clubjuggle T/C 13:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of
William Chandler (character)

A

its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Clubjuggle T/C 13:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Julie Williams

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

talk) 19:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of Neely O'Hara

Neely O'Hara, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neely O'Hara. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 17:49, 5 October 2008 (UTC) TTN (talk) 17:49, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of Otto The Director

Otto The Director, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otto The Director. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 14:38, 10 October 2008 (UTC) TTN (talk) 14:38, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of Nancy Beebe

I have nominated Nancy Beebe, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Beebe. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 15:53, 12 October 2008 (UTC) TTN (talk) 15:53, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Regina Morrow

A

its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Magioladitis (talk) 17:23, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of Willona Woods

Willona Woods, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willona Woods. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 15:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of Penny Gordon Woods

Penny Gordon Woods, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penny Gordon Woods. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 15:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Logan Family

Editors are considering merging your contributions into the Logan Family, in this article for deletion:

talk) 02:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of Anastasia Tremaine

Anastasia Tremaine, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anastasia Tremaine. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SilentAria talk 14:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Arcade (TV series)

I see you have edited this article before. Some clips from the show have surfaced on www.youtube.com - linked-to here: http://mercadotv.com.au/labels/nostalgia.html

Thought you might like to have a look. Format (talk) 05:39, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Harper Valley

Harper Valley, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harper Valley. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 02:19, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Unreferenced BLPs

unreferencedBLP
}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Winifred Freedman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bewitched's Sheila

Dear Sir. I removed the information you added about Sheila on the Bewitched page as this was not an essential character or element of the show. However, as the character Sheila made several appearances it would be a good idea to add her into the section on "other" recurring characters, and there I think would be a good place for inclusion of the content you wished to enter. Njsustain (talk) 20:34, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir, although your recent additions to Bewitched show your interest as a fan, I don't believe those passages add to an encyclopedic understanding of the show. Njsustain (talk) 23:19, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flo Meredith
and others

What Wikipedia is not
").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages:

sign your comments
with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

articles for deletion
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a

talk) 01:05, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Articles for deletion nomination of Lucas Hollingsworth

gr 05:30, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Fran Crowley

The article

Fran Crowley has been proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:

unsourced for four years

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

G. ツ 02:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Llanview

The article Llanview has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only sources are episodes. Entirely in-universe, consists of little more than plot summary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Llanview for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Llanview is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Llanview until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 13:41, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suzi Martin

The article

Suzi Martin has been proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:

Character is not notable enough for a standalone article. Suggest merge to list of Search for Tomorrow characters if possible,

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wlmg (talk) 17:54, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Raytown (Mama's Family)

The article

Raytown (Mama's Family) has been proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:

Not notable, entirely in-universe, no sourcing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 07:50, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alice Hyatt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alice Hyatt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Hyatt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article..John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:39, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of
Florence Jean Castleberry

The article

Florence Jean Castleberry has been proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:

This article is nothing but a rather lengthy bio of a fictional character. I arrived here when redirected from "Kiss my grits", after hearing the phrase in an unrelated context and hoping to understand the cultural context. Unfortunately, this page does nothing to clarify that, beyond an offhand mention that an alternate spelling of this phrase was a catchphrase for the character. It also does nothing to explain how this character is culturally notable; the detail here seems entirely pointless, and despite being flagged for several years, still no-one has provided reason why this character is significant enough to deserve her own page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walkersam (talk) 02:43, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elizabeth Gail Dobbs

The article Elizabeth Gail Dobbs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable character. Corresponding books/author do not have articles

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 07:47, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for
Mia Elliott

Mia Elliott—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Muzilon (talk) 09:49, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Edouard Aleata

Notice

The article

Edouard Aleata has been proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:

Fails NFICTION/GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Carlson

Notice

The article

Henry Carlson has been proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:

Fails NFICTION/GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:55, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vivian Carlson

Notice

The article

Vivian Carlson has been proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:

Fails NFICTION/GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:55, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alice Hyatt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alice Hyatt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Hyatt (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Florence Jean Castleberry

Notice

The article

Florence Jean Castleberry has been proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:

No evidence this minor fictional character passes GNG/NFICTION. Pure

WP:PLOT
.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mel Sharples

Notice

The article Mel Sharples has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this minor fictional character passes GNG/NFICTION. Pure

WP:PLOT
.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:28, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jolene Hunnicutt

Notice

The article Jolene Hunnicutt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this minor fictional character passes GNG/NFICTION. Pure

WP:PLOT
.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:28, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Winifred Freedman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Winifred Freedman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winifred Freedman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 16:59, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sally Spectra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sally Spectra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sally Spectra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sunset High (novel series)

Notice

The article Sunset High (novel series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A series of books that appears to fail

WP:GNG
.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 03:06, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Winifred Freedman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Winifred Freedman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winifred Freedman (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 00:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lexi Walker

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Lexi Walker, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion
, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Equine-man (talk) 10:42, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Caroline Aleata

Notice

The article Caroline Aleata has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:GNG
.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 18:36, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Betsy Crawford

Notice

The article Betsy Crawford has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:GNG
.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 18:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sarah Dale

Notice

The article Sarah Dale has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:GNG
.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 18:39, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Sterling

Notice

The article

Barbara Sterling has been proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:

Minor soap opera character, does not meet

WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

Rusf10 (talk) 04:12, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Sorority Sisters (novel series)

Notice

The article Sorority Sisters (novel series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet

WP:NBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

Rusf10 (talk) 02:00, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Allison MacKenzie

Notice

The article

Allison MacKenzie has been proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:

In-universe. Sourcing looks good, but upon closer examination, the sources are used to help retell the story rather than support real world discussion. Material is adequately covered in other articles, making this an unneeded fork.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 09:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Helen Elliott Donnelly

Notice

The article Helen Elliott Donnelly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, ALLPLOT, no evidence of notability. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:21, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:21, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Ben "Beanie" Harper
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Ben "Beanie" Harper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben "Beanie" Harper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 12:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AlbertGray&oldid=1219379331"