User talk:AlexMoore300

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Hello, AlexMoore300, and

welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions
. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction
 5    The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
  Help
  Tips
  How to write a great article
  Simplified Manual of Style
  Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Abductive (reasoning) 19:26, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

AlexMoore300, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi AlexMoore300! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

talk) 01:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

January 2013

Hello, I'm

talk) 18:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanks, but I disagree. Part 5 of the Wiki-rules on adverting state: 'External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify notable organizations which are the topic of the article.' - since in all three cases you've editted the authors came to prominence through their written work, I think links to these sites are fair.AlexMoore300 (talk) 11:55, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your response.
The organizations are not the topic of the article, so it doesn't apply.
So because they are authors, links to their publishers are appropriate? Since you're quoting WP:EL, take a look at
WP:ELNO
#1, 4, 5, 13, and 19.
To me, it looks like promotion of the publishers and the individual books that you are adding images of. --
talk) 17:06, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Please look at
WP:COI
in case it might apply.
So where are we at in these discussions? Are you still disputing the external links, or only the images at this point?
Given that the editing is across articles and I'm unclear on what you're disputing still, I'm not sure what our next step should be.
talk) 18:37, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

A brownie for you!

Thank you for your update at
talk) 21:42, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Thank you!AlexMoore300 (talk) 10:54, 13 February 2013 (UTC) Also thanks for the fly!AlexMoore300 (talk) 11:03, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Iain King page

Please don't misrepresent statements from publishers' blurbs of

Phil Bridger (talk
) 10:20, 31 January 2013 (UTC) That's not true - look at the economist review (they're independent, surely?), or the quote from the Royal Institute of Philosophy cited on the publisher's webpage (which they came up with themselves, surely?), or the quote from the Observer (again, cited by the publisher); the 'Publishers Weekly' review is definitely independent, and I'm sure a large publisher like Bloombury wouldn't say things like the Kofi Annan quote without a basis for it. The Daily Telegraph review, I accept, is 'from the publisher'; the 'National Library of Australia' description seems to be their own. If you think some of the quotes are based on publisher's promotional stuff, then either put that in the reference/footnote, or qualify the comment appropriately in the text. But your deletion has just taken out lots of references, most of which are perfectly valid, even by your unfairly strict criteria. AlexAlexMoore300 (talk) 12:45, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Iain King (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Enlightenment, Observer, Free Library, Newton, Gary Cox and London Review

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mario Kopić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phenomenology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Herman Cappelen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intuition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks - I've tried to fix it.AlexMoore300 (talk) 19:32, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another brownie for you!

Thank you very much for your very excellent work updating the article on Iain King from Felixthehamster (talk) 12:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]