User talk:Alexiaya/Archive 3

I'm somewhat curious since when did we start accepting Facebook as a reliable source for BLP info? See [[45]]

@

talk

) 12:20, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

THanks for pointing that out.

talk

) 12:57, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Hey, Nyuszika7H – how are you seeing the premiere of The Lodge "early"? Is the show having an online "preview" release? – If so, that info should probably be added to the article... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:52, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 13:55, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

 Done --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

One request: now that you've viewed the premiere episode, can you look over the article's 'Plot' section please? It looks overwritten to me, and I'd like to know how much of what's in that 'Plot' section is verified by the premiere episode... Thanks! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:08, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

It seems like pretty much everything was mentioned in the episode, except perhaps Skye's age (but that's mentioned in other sources [46] [47]). It does have grammar issues though, I'll fix those a bit later.

talk

) 14:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Actually, I guess it's a bit too much, though I'm not entirely sure which details were mentioned as not everything was clear due to the lack of subtitles. Also, I can't really tell what should go in the "main" plot summary and what should go in the episode summary.

talk

) 16:32, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Once it premieres here in the U.S., I'll take a look at it. I also run everything I watch through Closed Captioning, so I shouldn't miss anything even with the British accents... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:13, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

22:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Would you be so kind as to double-check this and see if I did it right and tweak things if necessary? Last time I uploaded images was back in 2009 relating to Digimon Data Squad, though they were eventually deleted for one reason or another, so just wanted to make sure I'm good here as I know you've done this quite a few times. Thanks in advance. Amaury (talk | contribs) 07:36, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 22:24, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Your account has been granted the "templateeditor" user permission, allowing you to edit

You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edinotices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established. If you are willing to process edit requests on templates and modules, keep in mind that you are taking responsibility to ensure the edits have consensus and are technically sound.

This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

Useful links

• All template-protected pages
• User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable – outstanding template-protected edit requests (bot-generated)
• Request fully-protected templates or modules be downgraded to template protection

Happy template editing! — xaosflux ^Talk 19:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Please carefully read my note at Special:PermaLink/740704702 regarding editing templates now that you are a template editor. — xaosflux ^Talk 19:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 19:36, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Any chance you could find a more reliable source, even as an archive, for the viewership of these three episodes? As far as I know, that's not really a reliable source (Son of the Bronx):

• Episode 16
• Episode 17
• Episode 18

Any chance you could find information/sources, even as archives, for these episodes?

• This episode has no viewership data:
  • Episode 21
• This episode has viewership data, but there is no source:
  • Episode 29
    •  Done
      talk
      ) 16:27, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

By coincidence, it's the same as episode 27, haha, give or take whatever the third number is before rounding. Amaury (talk | contribs) 06:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

I'll try. Technically, it's on a blog, but you could argue that it's reliable because there's no reasonable doubt that it's written by Douglas Pucci who also used to publish ratings on TV Media Insights before that site became defunct.

talk

) 08:49, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Gotcha. Make sense. I'll cross those out, then, to make it easier. Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:04, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

I can't seem to find the viewers for episode 21, I found a not-so-reliable blog (not Son of the Bronx) but even that doesn't mention Liv and Maddie.

talk

) 16:31, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Hm. And I actually did look at that Showbuzz Daily article for #29, but I must have overseen it. Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:48, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

18:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of The Thundermans episodes#Thundermans: Secret Revealed is a special. Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:08, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Just want you to know that a few small changes will be implement to MOS:TV, based on the most recent rewrite discussion, in case you would like to voice any opinions regarding them before they are implemented. Once those are done, the next section to cover will be the first "Image" section, with the first "Lead" section and everyone's favorite topic, "Plot", on deck. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:41, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so much for helping me with the episode list article draft and the episode tables! I appreciate it. Do you know why the summaries are showing up on the list? Chase (talk) 21:06, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

First, Nyuszika, thanks for the help above. Anyway, can you and IJBall, since he's had a lot of opinions on this subject, offer your feedback on this? Why do you suppose ratings for Disney Channel shows—or at least some as, without taking a glance at other shows, past or present, and refreshing my memory, I can't really say for sure—seem to always jump up and down, even for really popular shows like K.C. Undercover? For example, take a look at here. Using the last five episodes, we go from 1.18 for July 24, then up to 1.88 for August 7, then up to 1.97 for August 14, then down to 1.31 for September 11, and now down to 1.11 for September 18. Nickelodeon's ratings appear to be more consistent for the most part—again, I can't say for sure as I'd need to take a glance over its other shows, past or present, to refresh my memory. Amaury (talk | contribs) 13:38, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

I attribute it mostly to a combination of a young audience (i.e. one that doesn't stick to a "schedule" like an adult audience would) and multiple viewing options (e.g. either watching an episode later off the DVR, or just watching later on Disney Channel as they rerun episodes a million times, or on Disney Channel online). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:42, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

@IJBall: Yeah, I can see the point. Nickelodeon is likely the same way, but it must be different somehow. And, semi-related, I think Disney XD is on a totally different table on what's considered "good" ratings as its shows hardly go above 1.00, other than perhaps premieres or specials, or even 0.50. Amaury (talk | contribs) 13:53, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, not sure what's the difference with Nickelodeon. One thing I've noticed is that instead of removing old episodes, Watch Disney started restricting them again to those with a TV provider login (they start off as restricted, then available to everyone for a while, then back), at least for

talk

) 14:10, 20 September 2016 (UTC)