User talk:Alexiaya/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Rather than make a separate section on everyone's talk page, I'll just ask and tag the others here:

• IJBall
• Geraldo Perez
• MPFitz1968

Since we've all been working collaboratively with each other for quite a while now, for reference, what articles listed in my sandbox that are on my watch list are also on your guys' watch list? Amaury (talk) 02:33, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

For main TV series articles, I've got Austin & Ally; Best Friends Whenever; Bunk'd; Girl Meets World; Henry Danger; I Didn't Do It; Jessie; K.C. Undercover; Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn; Stuck in the Middle; and The Thundermans. Episode list articles: Austin & Ally; Dog with a Blog; Girl Meets World; Henry Danger; I Didn't Do It; Jessie; K.C. Undercover; Liv and Maddie; Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn; and The Thundermans. Character list articles: Girl Meets World.

I just added Backstage. I recall you requested that earlier, Amaury, though I was baffled about recent edits replacing the Canadian air dates, which should be there given that it's a Canadian show. I see it's in need of summaries; not sure how many I can do, but will rewatch and come up with what I can.

I do have a few actors/actresses related to these TV series on my watchlist as well, plus some other TV series. MPFitz1968 (talk) 07:32, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 11:13, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

@Amaury: In general, I don't put TV series on my watchlist (my watchlist is still focused more on rail-related topics, and (TV) actor bios; and often I don't need to because the rest of you guys have those handled!). I used to have Paradise Run on my list (after it was listed at AfD, and I helped get it into shape), but I took it off a couple of weeks after the new episodes stopped airing. I have Backstage on my watchlist currently because, up until a few days ago, no one else was watching it. And articles I helped "create" will generally remain on my watch list, so Lab Rats: Elite Force is on my watchlist, and is likely to stay there. However, I usually follow what you guys are up to, so I often see if one of the articles you guys is watching is "under attack" from vandals, etc. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:44, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

@MPFitz1968: Re. Backstage. That's already been resolved on my talk page and I've taken full responsibility for it. That's probably where you saw all that, though. And yes, I was silly. :)

Thanks, guys. Just waiting to hear back from Geraldo now. Also, IJBall, that's an interesting approach, but it still counts, in my opinion, since you have been helping out here and there, especially with those discussions a while ago regarding K.C. Undercover and Best Friends Whenever. Amaury (talk) 13:59, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Geraldo Perez, any input from you? Thanks in advance. :) Amaury (talk) 21:19, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

I watch most of those, looking mainly for vandalism and unreferenced changes. Stuff that is changed by editors I trust I just check for errors and possible incomplete vandalism reverts. I spend some time repairing vandalism, or marginally competent editors who sometimes go on crusades breaking stuff when I see it, and usually end up putting their pages I fixed in my watch list which is generally how my watchlist expands. I am glad to see more people working on kids shows, for a while it felt kind of lonely. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:05, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi Nyuszika7H! Could you please take a look at

Hey, Nyuszika7H – do you have a place to dig up archives of 'dead link' Disney Press releases? The So Random! random article has a ref with this link, but there's no (usable) archive for it at archive.org. Also pinging Geraldo Perez in case he knows an answer as well. TIA. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:16, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 16:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

OK, followup question – is there a way to mark a ref with a 'dead link' tag and get Cyberpower's bot to ignore it? --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:33, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 18:54, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Got our answer: you add a {{cbignore}} template after the ref's {{dead link}} tag. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Were you aware of this template – {{TV Ratings}}?

Is it salvageable? Or should it just be sent to

@

talk

) 19:52, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

(P.S. You might want to list the templates you've either created, or worked a lot on, on your User page. Personally, I know that would be helpful on my end when I'm looking for a particular TV template as I am right now!... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC))

Thank you for message about Kristan Schaal. I did not think I needed to source my update on Spouse as it documented in the section on her books "The Sexy Book of Sexy Sex":

"Schaal wrote a book of humor, The Sexy Book of Sexy Sex, with her husband, former Daily Show writer Rich Blomquist. It was published in July 2010 by Chronicle Books"

Thanks Bob Gibson Dover Delaware USA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wa3pxx (talk • contribs) 13:40, 17 May 2016‎

@

talk

) 13:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 14:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Brave Bison page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

That was intentional when I went thought it since Copyright Office has the highest authority. Amaury (talk) 18:38, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 20:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I can be like that myself. Amaury (talk) 20:08, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi! Someone just uploaded the "logo" for the upcoming Disney Channel series Bizaardvark, but it's substandard. You seem to be knowledgeable in this area – could you take a look, and maybe "improve" the current logo (so, for example, it's about as wide as the infobox?). Thanks! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:11, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Speedy#Opposed_nominations. – Fayenatic London 11:44, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

We may need to take User:Prtyinthusa to

Hi-The notability guidelines stated in Additional criteria, Any biography, No. 1: "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor or has been nominated for one several times." Quintin Primo was named bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Chicago which was a significant honor in 1972 and he served until 1985. Quintin Primo would be notable. Thank you-RFD (talk) 19:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

I would like to invite you to contribute to a discussion on whether or not "The Girl Who Died" and "The Woman Who Lived" and "Heaven Sent" and "Hell Bent" are two-parters. Over the course of 3 weeks and 2 discussions, only 3 editors including myself have contributed, so it would be a great help if you could take the time to contribute. Fan4Life (talk) 20:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

It looks weird capitalized, but I guess I can live with it... xD That's why I always go by the Chicago Manual of Style, which says prepositions should be lowercase unless at the beginning or end regardless of length. Amaury (talk) 20:23, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi, if you have some time, could you split off The 7D episodes from the main page? Thanks. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:54, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 20:55, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 13:10, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

I have NO conflict of interest CoI in listing my client's voice credits on the game, Golden Compass. I simply stated his name and the characters he voiced. The neutrality in my additions should be quite obvious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JGHSMC (talk • contribs) 22:20, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 09:21, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yolandi Visser. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 11:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

That one just passed through my

) 13:00, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry about that reaction, I can see how it would seem like vandalism at first look. It's not really necessary to include that part, I did that because usually the whole thing is included, IIRC {{

talk

) 16:13, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

No worries. I get what you're saying about the |title= parameter, for sure.

		The Minor Barnstar
		Great lookout on that one!Prof. Mc (talk) 17:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Prof. Mc (talk) 17:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

I am unable to replicate the bug your reported and disabled the bot over. It could've gotten fixed in the series of updates I made to the code, or it may have been temporary. Do you have other examples, I can try out?—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 19:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Just wanted to revive

I know you, IJBall, and MPFitz1968 are already watching the article for the new Disney Channel series, Bizaardvark, though I'm not sure about Geraldo Perez. If he's not, I'm sure he will after he sees this. And if I haven't mentioned it before, I'll mention it now that it is such a pleasure to work with all of you. Amaury (talk) 03:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Moving this here.

Yeah, that second set of lyrics with "...learn" instead of "...red alert" is a common one. I've never seen the other one, though. As for being right in one episode and then reverting, I think that has to do with them airing episodes out of production order. Since lyrics never change, they could just use a copy-paste or something if there's even such a thing for captioning. Although lyrics did change for the fourth season of Austin & Ally, but I don't think the lyrics themselves changed, there was the addition of Laura's voice. That's technically a change, I guess, but not the lyrics themselves. Amaury (talk) 22:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

My article is not a conflict of interest. My user includes 'Sartorius' because I am a fan of Jacob Sartorius. No Relation Rose Sartorius (talk) 05:37, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 07:59, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I was correcting the link since both Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde redirect to the Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (character) page since they are the same character. I didn't know you wanted them redirected according to NOTBROKEN section of Wikipedia:Redirect --Rtkat3 (talk) 18:08, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 18:10, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know that I can just move pages, as opposed to creating redirects. I know you deleted your comment, but still. Michael Reed (talk) 21:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 21:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

I stand corrected on my earlier statement. I also noticed the "hustle cool" one when I watched yesterday's new episode. Amaury (talk | contribs) 07:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Nyuszika7H

It appears that the page

Thanks to your help a while ago, I've simplified the code on my sandbox as well as merged cells with the same content. Click. Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:58, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

I'd advise you to quietly delete that twitter link and maybe even get it oversighted. Wikipedia is touchy about

Noting that I think you are on the right side of the line, but that line is very blurry to everyone right now...Tazerdadog (talk) 10:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 10:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

That's almost certainly going to be vague enough to be fine. Again, I think Wikipedia is just really touchy about it these days. Tazerdadog (talk) 11:01, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Just like there is now a more fluid episode table code, I'm sure there's the same for other tables, such as awards, rather than that ugly hard-coded stuff. Would you be interested in updating those in articles we're watching, like Austin & Ally? It also seems I messed up something after I trimmed the awards table per this discussion. Would you take a look there, too, please? I'll try and play around with it some more, but if I can't get it, you'll need to work your fantastic magic. Thank you. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:41, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 08:07, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I figured that out. -_- And thank you, my friend. Amaury (talk | contribs) 14:39, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Just a heads up for when or if you start watching this, because the show is comprised of two mini-episodes, I think is the correct term, of approximately 10 minutes each—pretty much like cartoons such as Rugrats—with the exception of the first episode and possibly some unknown future episodes, they list each mini-episode's guest stars—and co-stars, though they're not important enough to list, of course—in the credits. So if Principal Platt appears in both mini-episodes, he'll be shown twice, for example. However, that would just be a big mess to list actors twice, so what I will be doing for future mini-episodes' guest stars is combining them and basing the order off the first episode. (I've already done that with the second episode.) In my opinion, that's still correct because they are still one episode even though there are two mini-episodes, if that makes sense. As the old saying goes, one set of credits means one episode, regardless of how many production codes or mini-episodes an episode contains. Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:01, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 09:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so much Nyuszika7H for letting us edit Tafila Technical University page,

but unfortunately after lots of changes i made with my friends , suddenly someone just deleted every thing ,why..!

how can i edit this way..

thank you ,

--Thelaststory99 (talk) 10:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 10:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

page: Tafila Technical University, Nyuszika7H ,

because i work in this university and i am an admin on its website , and the info just copied from some sections of the website , how get the permission for ourselves?

and how protect ourselves from others edits ?

thanks in advance :)

--Thelaststory99 (talk) 10:34, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 10:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello Nyuszika7H ,

page: Tafila Technical University

I went to the link (donating copyright materials to wikipedia) and read lots of details , but I didn't get what exactly should I do yet ,

for example i read this ("One simple way to grant permission to copy material already online is to put that permission explicitly on the site where that material is posted. This is commonly known as a "copyleft" notice. This notice must state that your site (or portions of your site) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts) or that it is in the public domain. For text, a good statement of release might read")

does this mean i can make link on my website to that agreement? will this work ?

i just don't want to rephrase the whole articles , the articles just about history of the university , colleges and centers , not a scientific essay ?!

thanks in advance :) --Thelaststory99 (talk) 08:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Thelaststory99: Putting this notice on the website (usually at the bottom, but doesn't matter) should work:

<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License</a>.

–

talk

) 08:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Nyuszika7H , thank you sir here is the link : http://www.ttu.edu.jo/cclicense.html,

and the agreement symbol is now located at the footer of our page : http://www.ttu.edu.jo/index.php/en/ ,

what next step now to edit our page in peace without removing it by any one ? page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tafila_Technical_University thanks :) --Thelaststory99 (talk) 09:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thelaststory99 (talk • contribs) 09:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC) 

@

talk

) 09:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

nyuszika7h , i know this , maybe u didn't get me , i mean to avoid removing it completely for the reason (copyright to official website) , and not locking the page , so what next step to prove this change ? i posted the link on talk page of the university , thank you . --Thelaststory99 (talk) 09:45, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 09:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@nyuszika7h ,thank you so much sir for your very quick help , we appreciate , thanks again --Thelaststory99 (talk) 09:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. I left you a message about the userboxes I did few days ago but you did not reply. So if you may see that I upladed images and used it for those userboxes. Now someone is trying to delete them due to copyright things. Are the images ok for it? Because I want to keep them. Typhoon2013 (talk) 19:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 19:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Oh, never mind, I see you've uploaded them to Commons. Yeah, those are probably complex enough to qualify for copyright protection, so you can't use them.

talk

) 20:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

So switch back to the pokeball images? Typhoon2013 (talk) 20:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 20:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

I think you have it backwards. If an edit is UNSOURCED, you can be bold and delete. However, from [Wikipedia:Content removal]: when removing a section of an article, it is necessary that it at least be explained, and in some cases, discussed. Unexplained content removal is when the reason for the removal is not obvious, and is open to being promptly reverted.: In this case, the source is unimpeachable: Dun & Bradstreet and your deletion falls into the category of [Wikipedia:I just don't like it]: "Wikipedia is not a business deal. It is an encyclopedia. Well-argued statements beat personal, subjective tastes". So, please discuss before trying to remove this section (you can edit/dispute it all you like, of course).Santamoly (talk) 20:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 20:52, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

I noticed you created

@

talk

) 08:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Oh, nice. I've never known about that; I'll be sure to set it.

?

08:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I notice that you reverted my change. I have just checked the website and the copyright notice is STILL on the website. Can you please check with me, i.e. by coming to my talk page before making an further edits to the page. This is getting ridiculous. Thank-you David.moreno72 13:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 13:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. I just checked and there is still a line that says 'Tafila Technical University © 2016 | Development and design : Ateyah ALbdour'. While the text 'Tafila Technical University © 2016' is present, the copyright remains, even if a CC logo is present. What is needed is the replacement of the copyright notice with 'Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.' But even when the copyright notice is removed, there is still the problem of plagiarism, which is why a revert is not appropriate at this time. Thank-you. David.moreno72 13:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 13:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 13:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm certainly no expert on copyright. The editor has been trying for some time to get his copying and pasting onto Wikipedia (starting on the 12th of July!!), so much so that they received multiple indefinite blocks for multiple socks. Also, when the page was protected they even created a duplicate of the page (now deleted) !! Personally I don't know why they are so adamant to get it onto Wikipedia anyway. If one wants to find out more detail on the university they can visit it's home page. I also doubt that they have obtained permission from the university management to add a copyleft logo onto the page. The whole mess could have been avoided if they had simply used their own words. Anyway, thanks for your comments. Happy editing. David.moreno72 14:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 14:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

In finding https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfNTEf5ZtSc looking for the evil sorceress' name I refreshed myself on the plot and realized that in star wars terms it appears that probably Sofia the First is episodes 4-6 and Elena of Avalor is episodes 1-3. Sofia was first broadcast but being that Elena's trapped in the amulet (grimdark ending known in advanced like w/ Darth Vader) and the amulet exists in the first episode of Sofia the First (handed down for generations, I think they said) it's like a prequel that is aired after.

So is 'followed by' only appropriate for a second series which aired after the first series AND includes events which occur after the first series' events, like

First, before I say anything, let me just clarify that I am not mad or upset or getting after you in any way whatsoever or anything. I am simply trying to discuss something. :) I have problems myself determining the tone of an online message and I often misinterpret messages, so I just wanted to say that so your feelings aren't potentially hurt or you don't get mad at me, haha! Normally, I don't really do this, but this case I feel could be different if I didn't mention this.

I remember when you and

Anyway, I feel that

@

talk

) 15:10, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the swift response, pal! I'll wait for IJBall's opinion, but given what you said about not caring either way, would you have any grievances about me changing it back, then? Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 15:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

@Amaury: I won't lie – I prefer more capitalization of words in titles than our MOS allows for. (For example, not capitalizing the word "like" in many of our movie and song titles looks abjectly wrong to me...) So, to me, "Without" looks better capitalized. All that said, I've long given up having any strong opinions about title capitalizations, and so don't have any strong opinions in this particular instance either. [shrug] --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Nyuszika7H, thanks for your thanks, heres a kitten

Coolabahapple (talk) 17:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

I didn't know you could make things not wrap, like for the performed by. May have to do that on the other articles now so the song name is all on one line and the credits are all on the same line on the line below. Amaury (talk | contribs) 21:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Well, both MTV Fandom Awards and E! Awards are given during San Diego Comic Con and I don't think that they are non-notable awards. You get the award statuette, so it's a normal award which should be included. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vindre (talk • contribs) 08:11, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 09:11, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Nyuszika7H – how many files have you requested renames on? If it's approx. 6 or more, I think you may want to request

@

talk

) 09:10, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

OK. When you get a few more rename requests under your belt, I'd definitely advise considering requesting File mover. FWIW... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:17, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --HamedH94 (talk) 15:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

I missed the premiere of Gamer's Guide's second season yesterday, and it doesn't look like the first episode is repeating anytime soon. (For a moment I also thought I missed a new episode of Kirby Buckets, but thankfully there wasn't one this week.) So when I do record next week's new episode of Gamer's Guide and possibly new episodes after that depending on when the first episode repeats, I'll have to wait to watch it until I've recorded the first episode as I like to watch things, at least the first time, in airing order.

I wish Disney XD would make up its mind. They go from Mondays to Wednesdays to Mondays to Wednesdays... Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@Amaury: Yeah, that also happens to me with shows that air here and it's annoying. Sometimes my set-top box for satellite TV just "forgets" to record scheduled things (protip: never buy anything from Sagem/Sagemcom, though in this case it was given by the provider). I do forget to schedule it in the first place sometimes, though a blogger usually posts monthly schedules for kids' channels (Disney, Nick, etc.) almost a month in advance here, so that's helpful.

For U.S. shows I don't have this problem since I don't live there and most things get TV, Watch Disney and iTunes rips posted quickly, so I just download the episodes because I'm not waiting forever for a dubbed version, I prefer watching in original language anyway, at least for English shows (and anime, and even that usually with English subtitles because they tend to be better than Hungarian ones).

Speaking of Gamer's Guide, I'm behind on that right now as the last one I've seen is episode 17 (I was watching other shows).

talk

) 18:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Better get caught up, foo'! Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 18:46, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I know you can do that, but I'm not exactly sure how it works, either. "Does it cost anything?" and "What do you sign in with?" are two questions, for example. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 18:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Or satellite provider. :P We've got DirecTV. And I think Nickelodeon does the same thing, but I don't know if they'd still have Max & Shred season two, especially considering it was on Nicktoons, which we don't have on this package. I also never saw the first episode of the first season since it seems they never really advertised the show. It's one of those shows where they don't bother putting it in their lineup for reruns. They only show it once, and that's it. Too bad for anyone who missed it. At least Disney Channel and Disney XD don't do that. Sure, it may sometimes take a while, at least on Disney XD, for a new episode to repeat, but once it does, it's usually shown quite often. I also think Disney handles their shows better. They also have silent cancellations and the like, but from personal experience, not as often as Nickelodeon, and they almost always at least have three seasons. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:30, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

@

A few showings of The Ringer again on August 3. That's not that long of a wait. :) In the meantime, of course they're showing reruns of everything else from the first season, but not the first episode of the second season. Logic! And so I don't forget, I've gone ahead and set my DVR earlier than normal for tomorrow's new episodes of Kirby Buckets, Lab Rats: Elite Force, and Gamer's Guide to Pretty Much Everything. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:24, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

I suppose you're right, but that editor still shouldn't use IMDB to claim its edits. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 23:02, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

You may need to tweak the viewership data reference I provided for the latest episode (as well as on List of Kirby Buckets episodes for Buckets of Money from season two) as I can't remember if comments eventually disappear or not. Or does what you said in the Viewership Data discussion here also apply to Lab Rats: Elite Force (and Gamer's Guide to Pretty Much Everything) since Disney XD's viewers are lower compared to Nickelodeon and Disney Channel, so they end up not making Showbuzz Daily's list most of the time. Although like I said before, it would be nice if they listed all of the shows in the official list or, at the very least, increased it to the top 200 or 250. Amaury (talk | contribs) 18:32, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

If both sources say that, then it might have been me and I subconsciously read it and wrote "weasels." Although I'm pretty sure the sources are the ones with the typographical error as Chrome underlines "weasles" as red. However, we can wait until the episode airs. It might not even be the word we think it is. Amaury (talk | contribs) 14:58, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

I'll leave it up you, but just wanted to mention that what you said wasn't fully accurate: It's redundant to include even the date part of the titles for Showbuzz Daily since it's in the |date= parameter already, so the titles can be made even shorter. The date parameter contains the date Showbuzz Daily published the ratings—for example, using the first episode of Backstage, March 28, 2016—whereas the date they have in their title is the date those shows actually aired—for example, using the first episode of Backstage again, March 25, 2016. Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:42, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 20:45, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Happy to help. Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Also, a tip: you can use the {{

talk

) 20:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

My other concern with that edit is that I'm not sure it's right to "truncate" a title like that, even if the date had been "redundant" – I think we should generally use titles like that for refs "as is", even if they contain "redundant" date info. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Please archive episode two's viewers. Thanks! I don't think we need to do anything with episode one's viewers as I already had to find that via the Wayback Machine as the comments were already deleted. Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:41, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

And Buckets of Money from List of Kirby Buckets episodes#Season 2 (2015–16)? Thanks. Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 08:24, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

For Kirby Buckets the comments were already gone, but I found a copy in the Wayback Machine and added that.

talk

) 08:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I wonder if you could help me with the user

Hi nyuszika7h, I'm sorry about those notifications, that must have been annoying. I'm sure you got a lot of them. My bad. I promise I'll be more careful next time. Thank you for being so kind about it. Gonzalogallard (talk) 16:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

@

talk

) 16:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Just thought you might be interested in knowing that the captioning got those two parts of the lyrics correct in this episode. ;) It had a unique opening sequence as well; also, rather than having the cold opening first as always, the show started straight with the opening sequence. You're going to love it when you get to it! :) Amaury (talk | contribs) 03:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)