User talk:Aleyamma38
Aleyamma38, you are invited to the Teahouse!
![]() |
Hi Aleyamma38! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 8 July 2020 (UTC) |
Fan-based editing
Wikipedia is a
Further, edit summaries are intended to be used to explain to other editors why you made the changes you did. Comments like "advanced b'day_wishing a successful 26th 2021 ahead" are not what the edit summary field is for. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:09, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, and one other thing, re: File:Aparna Mishra KKB Actress.jpg, you can't take content from sources like the subject's Instagram, then claim that they are in the Creative Commons. That's intellectual property theft and it will not be tolerated. Don't do it again. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- My extreme apologies for these errors. I will change them and never commit them again. Sorry once again--Aleyamma38 (talk) 19:16, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
April 2021
Hello, I'm Beccaynr. I noticed that you recently removed content from Debattama Saha without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please discuss on the Talk page of the article. Beccaynr (talk) 05:13, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- WP:PUFFERY.
- Plus, I removed the source of PINKVILLA because it is an unrealiable source. Please check WP:RELIABLE for more guidance. Best--Aleyamma38 (talk) 05:24, 21 April 2021 (UTC)]
- From my view, nothing in the article fit the description of repeatedly making reversions. Your revisions also appear to have removed content from the lead based on reliable sources that support notability, in an article you have nominated for deletion, so I request that you restore that information as well. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 05:42, 21 April 2021 (UTC)]
- WP:RELIABLE which clearly indicates Pinkvilla to be a UNRELIABLE SOURCE. I really appreciate your nerve to save the article. Please do it without involving FAN BASED EDITING and ADDING UNRELIABLE SOURCES. Best--Aleyamma38 (talk) 05:49, 21 April 2021 (UTC)]
Your revisions also appear to have removed content from the lead based on reliable sources that support notability,
Please note except for Pinkvilla, the other source which has been part of career section has been shifted to television section. So, it is still present in the article. Best--Aleyamma38 (talk) 05:53, 21 April 2021 (UTC)- Pinkvilla appears to be a legitimate entertainment website, so it seems usable as a review. There also was no rewritten content - it was additional prose written in a neutral style based on information from a reliable source, so it was not puffery. In addition, the content I added to the lead that you removed was based on information from reliable sources that described a significant role in a notable television show, so I disagree with the removal. I continue to request that you reconsider your deletions based on my explanation. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 06:10, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- WP:PUFFERY by removing additional details in Career section which is meant for the present roles and very important roles (such as debut or breakthrough roles). So, I would not reconsider my deletions. Please do improve the article more with the help of RELAIBLE SOURCES AND NOT INVOLVING FAN-BASED EDITING. Thanks--Aleyamma38 (talk) 06:17, 21 April 2021 (UTC)]
- Hello again, I noticed on your Talk page that there is a section titled Fan-based editing, and maybe Cyphoidbomb could help clarify the issue on the article Talk page, now that this is being discussed there? Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 23:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Beccaynr, I think you should look into and understand the section titled Fan-based editing more, so that you realize, WHY ACTUALLY I REMOVED THE CONTENT from Debattama Saha, Best--Aleyamma38 (talk) 03:53, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Beccaynr Just to inform you ONE SMALL THING, I'm not going to edit Wikipedia anymore from now onwards so you can continue with editing of Debattama Saha in the way you want. I won't be there to object anything. Goodluck--Aleyamma38 (talk) 04:26, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Beccaynr, I think you should look into and understand the section titled Fan-based editing more, so that you realize, WHY ACTUALLY I REMOVED THE CONTENT from Debattama Saha, Best--Aleyamma38 (talk) 03:53, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hello again, I noticed on your Talk page that there is a section titled Fan-based editing, and maybe Cyphoidbomb could help clarify the issue on the article Talk page, now that this is being discussed there? Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 23:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Pinkvilla appears to be a legitimate entertainment website, so it seems usable as a review. There also was no rewritten content - it was additional prose written in a neutral style based on information from a reliable source, so it was not puffery. In addition, the content I added to the lead that you removed was based on information from reliable sources that described a significant role in a notable television show, so I disagree with the removal. I continue to request that you reconsider your deletions based on my explanation. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 06:10, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- From my view, nothing in the article fit the description of
- Plus, I removed the source of PINKVILLA because it is an unrealiable source. Please check