User talk:Alucard 16/Archive 4

---

Alucard 16	Talk	Awards	Subpages	Contributions	Workshop

---

---

This one was created under a different title I see (only one deletion is in the log). So no protection would be necessary here, yet. - Rjd0060 (talk) 14:28, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for rollback/Denied/May 2008#Alucard 16. RFRBot (talk) 17:00, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry i don't have a talk page. I was just wondering should it be added that pictures were leaked today to the article?? I've heard you're the person to talk to about things like this, if not sorry for bothering you.89.100.221.196 (talk) 19:01, 26 May 2008 (UTC)E-To-The-Izzo[reply]

How do you make one? I want to make versions for

WP:TAR. Or could you format them yourself if you have time? Thanx! Shapiros10 Came Back! 22:44, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Joining the Big Brother group or whatever

Heya, BigOz here, how do I do it? do I just add whatever it was (I forgot) so... how do I do it? I love Big Brother and I can actually do Nomination Tables quite good :P hehe. p.s - Do i need to add Edit Summary for talk-pages? --BigOz22 (talk) 19:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. :) Let me know if you want it unprotected at some point. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 08:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heya, it mostly regards Nomination Table, somehow, Carole, Jackiey and Jack are NOT in there, I fixed Carole's Jackiey talbe (with hope that Carole was BANNED from nominating) so now, all I need to know is Jack's nominations, do you know where I could find it? Thanks --BigOz22 (talk) 12:37, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm asking you if you have time to create one for

WP:SURVIVE. Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:32, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Rollback

WP:HUGGLE if you want a fast tool for reverting vandalism. Cheers! Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 00:57, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Big Brother

What's the problem with a valid and completely relevant external link? Quit reverting my edits. Don't you have any better way to spend your time? Why destroy others' contributions when you could be contributing yourself? —Preceding unsigned comment added by W99 (talk • contribs) 06:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the link you provided. I have looked over it and found that the site I have added is perfectly acceptable by those standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by W99 (talk • contribs) 23:48, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hello Alucard 16. i want to say thankyou for sticking up for me against in23065. I do wish to remain annonymous but thankyou. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.19.65.78 (talk) 20:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've been "observing" this interaction, and I wonder if In23065 needs taking to ANI? Their behaviour towards this anonymous user is out of line IMHO. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 22:36, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

whats ani and imho? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.19.65.78 (talk) 00:55, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ANI= Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents for anonymous and registered users to voice a complaint against another anonymous and/or registered user and an administrator will look in to the situation. IMHO = In my humble opinion IMHO is a text speak abbreviation of the phrase. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 04:43, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see that you fixed the logo problem. Yeah, looking into semi-protection would be a great idea if you ask me, people really like to change those things around a lot for some reason. Looking forward to BB10. T (Formerly Known as FireSpike) 06:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I've replied to your questions on my talk page. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 07:31, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alucard 16. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. In23065 (talk) 10:37, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Also copied to In23065)

.

Both of you, please try to resolve content disputes on the article talk page, rather than reverting each other. Even if you don't go over the

, you may still be blocked for disruptive editing.

EyeSerene^talk 13:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HAHAHAHAHA, Thought as much. In23065 (talk) 14:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In23065, if you don't intend to comment on article content, I strongly suggest you keep away from this talk page. Incivility and trolling will get you blocked just as quickly as edit-warring. EyeSerene^talk 14:23, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry :). In23065 (talk) 14:29, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you'll have noticed, the bulk of my note was intended for In23065. I copied to both talk pages since you had both posted to

]

No problem, and thank you for understanding ;) EyeSerene^talk 21:24, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like some1 erased the boxes for Housemates 8-13, they shold be their but just blank. I dont know how to fix it. You are the King Of Big Brother on Wiki(LOL) can u fix it. You do a awesome job on here every time. SturrockNY21 (talk) 03:18, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, u truly Rule at Big Brother! SturrockNY21 (talk) 05:02, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I came across this page via your request at

]

Yep, what Oren0 said. Page protection is very much a last resort, since it restricts who can edit (which is not the Wikipedia way!), so I think we can handle this by keeping an eye on the IP. They know the score now, and will be looking at ever-increasing block lengths if they continue to edit-war when their current 24-hour block expires. I've got the page watchlisted and will be keeping an eye on things, but don't hesitate to get in touch if you've got any concerns. All the best, EyeSerene^talk 09:22, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alucard 16, you seem to of deleted Week 1 altogether now? I don't dare to change that page because I will probably get banned. In23065 (talk) 11:29, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I agree. Page protected - see talk page. Hope this helps. EyeSerene^talk 19:47, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The only person reverting the page was the IP so there is no need to delete week one. In23065 (talk) 19:49, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, good luck with your attempt to finally resolve this dispute. I think you've done a good job of summarising both positions, and hope the other editors respond in kind.

Secondly, I will certainly consider full page protection if your dispute resolution attempt does not have the hoped-for results, or if certain editors refuse to abide by any consensus reached. However, this would only be a temporary measure, and to be honest it's not the best solution. I should also point out that, per

, the page would be protected on whatever version is current at the time the protection is applied. I'd suggest seeing what the response is when other editors come back on line, and if nothing improves I'll take another look. Feel free to drop me a note if it looks like I'm not paying enough attention.

I suspect, from what I've seen so far, that the situation may resolve itself when one or more editors earns a long-term block. However, I hope I'm proved wrong, and you all manage to come to some agreement. Your continued efforts towards this end are much appreciated. EyeSerene^talk 21:09, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help with the big brother houseguests page. I just signed up and started editing when I did that page so I'm definitely new. :) Your help was greatly appreciated! Jennyfurrr03 (talk) 14:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Was what I put in the opening section good? Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 01:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your efforts in helping to establish consensus there. Page protection has now expired, and I've noticed reversion has resumed, so I've re-protected. If you let me know which revision reflects the consensus established, I'll revert to that - protection is fairly long-term this time, so hopefully the edit-warriors will lose interest ;) EyeSerene^talk 16:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thought so, but I wanted to check. Regards, EyeSerene^talk 09:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just wonering where do u get the Millions rating, i can find the one at Zap2it, but not the other.SturrockNY21 (talk) 19:13, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright that sounds good to me. I just wasn't sure because it wasn't a task per se, but I'm fine with leaving it in the table. - zachinthebox _(Talk) 20:26, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I belive somebody changed Vanessa's name to Nicky. Could you make sure ALL nominations are correct and correct Vanessa's name into Nicky on your way. --BigOz22 (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Either somebody by accident or on purpose, swapped places with Charley to Nicky.

I think nominations are ALRIGHT BUT, Charley is the missing her's last week nominations.

Currently it looks as if Charley was evicted week after the FAKE week (which infact is wrong since she was evicted NEXT WEEK, Nicky was evicted week after FAKE week. I don't know how where to find Charley's nominations and BB8UK site doesn't show nominations, but I bet it's probably Gerry and Ziggy. --BigOz22 (talk) 03:24, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By 82.13.191.82 =). I belive he should be dealt with in someway. He or She keeps changing infobox AND nomination table trying to indicate that Vanessa was evicted WAY later than she actually did. --BigOz22 (talk) 00:25, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• • How do I report this to ADMINISTARTORS ? I am still "newish" --BigOz22 (talk) 22:10, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the discussion that I started on

]

2008-09 TV schedule

Just posted on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2008%E2%80%9309_United_States_network_television_schedule to indicate support for getting rid of the 6:30-7 half hour in Sunday night prime time. I provided a few arguments to back you up, and since you already have the code ready for that, I'd say make the change if you want. Thanks. Yasha1969 (talk) 09:04, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TV Gudie has Big Brother 11 listed for mid season 2009. ^[1] & ^[2]. So ya might have to start a BB11 page. I told you as you are the best with BB on Wiki SturrockNY21 (talk) 03:35, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Big Brother 11's Application has been released http://www.cbs.com/primetime/big_brother/application.pdf Does that mean its been green lighted? SturrockNY21 (talk) 05:26, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Husond protected Big Brother 11; you'd do best to ask him/her. Nyttend (talk) 23:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, it is now Unprotected. Sources will be necessary indeed, otherwise this would meet

]

Looks good, thank you for your work. :-) Best regards, Húsönd 01:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, hope not bothering, do you know if anyone or you know, that the "Infobox" about housemates are correct (it was left untouched for a while, so I wasn't sure if it's correct, I am not sure if Manuel was evicted or walked, mind checking if everything is alright? I don't speak fluent French (I don't even speak good French at all) Thanks --BigOz22 (talk) 18:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've done a great job working on Big Brother and I want to congradulate you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Speedleader (talk • contribs) 02:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Paradisehotel2.gif)

You've uploaded

Wikipedia's rules for non-free images

. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:13, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vip Brother 3 Bulgaria Nominations Table

Hi! I wondered if you could help me with the nominations table, because the new format of

VIP Brother 3 (Bulgaria) introduced some new elements in the nominations , and I don't know what should be included and how. Thank you! Bai brother (talk) 14:38, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you

Thanks, Alucard, for stepping in with though trolls attacking me. To be personal if I may, they are starting to get me down a bit, and making feel depressed and suicidal. I've been through a lot in real life, and their attacks are hurting whilst I'm in a vulnerable state of play. I'm at the point of taking those trolls to

WP:AN; but that can be a daunting experience in itself. And everytime I have gone to admins for help, I never get support or back-up from others who have witnessed the attacks aimed at me. But anyway, I just wanted to show my gratitude to you on all of this. Wes Wolf ^Talk 14:33, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

@

WP:AN I be there for you . I thank you too for being personal I don't know what your going through but if you ever need support I will help the best I can. I personally thank you for helping me as I contribute to the Eurovision articles I've learned a lot from you. Just remember for every troll you have lots of editors and readers who appreciate your hard work and dedication . ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 15:28, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

P.S. I wish I could vote in Eurovision I was waving my Union Jack flag for Lucie this year. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 15:28, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes

Hi Alucard 16, when reviewing pending changes please ensure that you do not accept edits that add unsourced material, especially to

biography articles. In this specific case this was the same information I enabled the protection to prevent. Thank you,--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:13, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

To editor Ponyo: Ah okay no worries sorry about that I'm usually good about that sort of thing. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 13:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, sometimes they slip through. I'm never sure whether it's a simple oversight or a misunderstanding of the pending changes requirements so I thought it best to leave a reminder. Thank you for all you do here, --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

WP:LTA/VXFC
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
You have written: Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. They can't. The page is protected. 78.145.21.69 (talk) 16:44, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Alucard 16/Archive 4#Sockpuppet investigation

WP:LTA/VXFC
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Baseball Bugs continued to harass me at my talk page last night. He accused me of "bigotry" at the Reference desk. He has been nothing but trouble since he joined: At 13:09, 15 October 2008 Bwilkins observed: ... any post that has "lame", "jerk" and "dick" within a few words of each other deserves some action. At 03:38, 8 February 2012 Stanistani referred to his "rancid antics". At 15:40, 23 August 2013 IRWolfie described him as Someone being a jerk or making crass remarks He has now been banned from administrator noticeboards after a racist diatribe but the proposal to ban him from the Reference desk as well was deferred to see if his behaviour improved. It hasn't. He is currently discussing with Nil Einne a "long-term abuse" page from which, according to Nil Einne, it is impossible to ascertain what the nature of the alleged "long-term abuse" might be. It appears that certain individuals are out to "get" Muslims and have no scruples about how they achieve that object. The persons concerned are mostly not U K residents, but their actions are effective here. Apparently racist behaviour where no other explanation is evident secures a conviction under the Race Relations Act even where no formal evidence of same is presented (i.e. it is unnecessary to prove mens rea - that will be assumed). Baseball Bugs virtually admitted this in last night's diatribe. Two sentences in a Daily Telegraph report of 21 September stand out: The move has been prompted by widespread consumer concerns over child abuse, bullying, fake news and internet addiction. Elizabeth Denham, the Information Commissioner, said voluntary regulation was no longer sustainable.