User talk:Amanda Paul

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

]

Paul Atherton - help with reinstatement

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page .

I've noticed that my entry for Paul Atherton has been deleted on notability grounds, 5 years after it was accepted.

The press coverage on Paul has increased over this time and links and notations were added to my contribution.

I've been forthcoming about knowing Paul in my previous posts and didn't believe that to be a reason not to contribute as the evidence to support his notability was substantial (accepted in the National Film Archive, First & Only Director to have film shown on a National Landmark, TV, Radio & press coverage etc.)

It appears that the editor User:Peterforever2 who suggested it's deletion doesn't exist and I would like some help in having the page reinstated Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Atherton (2nd nomination)

Normally if a tag for deletion is applied to something I've generated it appears in my user talk. It doesn't appeared to have done so in this instance. So I wasn't able to defend my submission.

Many thanks

Amanda Paul

Hello. If you think that the article should not have been deleted, you can stop by

WP:DRV and post it for review. Topher385 (talk) 22:53, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Amanda Paul. You have new messages at The Bushranger's talk page.
Message added 16:07, 8 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

The Bushranger _{One ping only} 16:07, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Amanda Paul, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply ]

Managing a conflict of interest

FAQ for organizations

for more information. In particular, please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
• instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to

The COI tag on this talk page was removed by a bot, based on the bot's belief that "Amanda Paul" has not edited for many years. Nevertheless, users with the same viewpoint, tone, and argumentation style repeatedly showed up during those years, probably typing their contributions with the same fingers that once used the sig Amanda Paul. So I would like to preserve that memory here on the talk page. HouseOfChange (talk) 21:26, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Our London Lives (2016 film). Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 05:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Amanda Paul. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Atherton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Atherton (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HouseOfChange (talk) 04:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ballet of Change: Piccadilly Circus (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HouseOfChange (talk) 14:07, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our London Lives until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HouseOfChange (talk) 15:43, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colour Blind (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colour Blind (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HouseOfChange (talk) 16:19, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Silent Voices (2005 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silent Voices (2005 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HouseOfChange (talk) 16:22, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Black & White Handshake - Still from the film Colour Blind (2009).JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. HouseOfChange (talk) 03:29, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Black & White Handshake - Still from the film Colour Blind (2009).JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robert Cavanah in Golliwog Make-up - Colour Blind 2009.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:13, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Silent Voices DVD Cover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]