User talk:Angel caboodle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user is a WikiGnome.
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Ohai dere!
This is Angel caboodle's Talk Page.
Feel free to leave her a message, and she'll be sure to respond as quickly as possible.
Just remember to sign your posts with ~~~~ so she'll know who you are! :-)

Thanks!

Thanks very much for supporting my

talk/contribs) 23:35, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

No problem at all! And if you run again in the future – something I highly suggest – be sure to tell me, and I'll once again give you my support. --Angel caboodle 02:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Degrassi

Sorry about the mixup! :) phoenixMourning (talk) 01:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ha, I was just about to say... I was the one reverting the vandalism. :-P Angel caboodle (talk) 01:36, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

introduction to editing. Thanks. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 20:46, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Unconstructive? I was summarizing the bio of a character that was too long! The previous writer had just written out an episode summary of Episode 2 of Series 2, which is too much information, so I summed up the main points. How is that unconstructive? Angel caboodle (talk) 21:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ewww inappropriate warning!! ——
t • c 07:12, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

RE: Barnstar

Thank very much for the barnstar, you're too kind! :) ——

(t)•(c) 08:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

No problem at all! You deserved it! :-) Angel caboodle (talk) 11:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas

Does he need his own article, when there's so little information about him? Many shows don't have pages for each recurring character, including powerhouse shows like SpongeBob. If

Degrassi Community School was deleted as non-notable, I really don't think Lucas would stand a chance if he was ever brought up on AfD. The fewer the amount of articles, the safer. -- Zanimum (talk) 00:58, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

You have a point, but at the same time, his information was previously on the
Jane Valieri article, when it shouldn't because they're two separate (although related) characters. I moved the information to a new article, seeing as searching for "Lucas Valieri" just redirected to Jane's article, but if enough people are against this, I have no problem with the article's deletion. :-) - Keng - t | c - 14:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

A Barnstar

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
I hereby award you,
t | c 14:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Thank-you! :-) - Keng - t | c - 14:37, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hello Angel caboodle, I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see

Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Acalamari 17:29, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Thank-you!! - Keng - t | c - 17:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome! Acalamari 17:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks very much for the Barnstar! :) ——

t | c 21:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

No problem at all, sir! You well deserved it!! :-D - Keng - t | c - 21:12, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Blekinge Street Gang

I just rolled back your edit to this article, as it looked like a vandalism with a bogus edit summary. Upon further examination, it appears that in doing some spelling corrections, you inadvertently removed an entire lengthy subsection. I hope you will continue to do spelling corrections, and wanted to clarify that no ill-will was intended here. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:48, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my, thanks for letting me know! I don't know how I could have done that!! I'll fix the spelling of those words without removing a section haha. - Keng - t | c - 14:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

Well done on your work on List of serial killers by number of victims:) It needed someone to finally take it seriously! I have a question though: what's your position on the inclusion of someone like Dr John Bodkin Adams? Another editor in the past has opposed my attempt to include him here, saying that he was acquitted (which is true). Basically... Adams was tried in 1957 in the UK but the trial seems to have been deliberately lost by the prosecution (who didn't want a doctor to hang for the murder of a patient). Police archives suggest he was the likely killer of 163 patients. Do you think he deserves inclusion? I would say yes since critical consensus is that he was guilty, but the other editor says the acquittal overrides everything (despite it being considered doubtful by almost all sources). Bearing in mind the guy died in 1983, BLP hardly applies and I say we should go and include him. What do you think since you seem to have your head screwed on right (unusual for the people editing the serial killer list;) )? Thanks. Malick78 (talk) 17:33, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well from the information you've given me, in my opinion that name should be added. Even though he wasn't found guilty of the murders, there was reason to believe (by police and otherwise) that he was responsible, and thus should be included in the article (just as
Moninder Singh Pandher was, who at this point in time, still has a "proven victims" figure of 0). - k|e|n|g - t | c - 17:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Okay, then I'll add him again soon and if someone objects maybe they will listen to your view if not mine:) Thanks. Malick78 (talk) 12:52, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Angel

Sorry, I'll fix the article, so it meets the the rules of sources.

Thanks for the information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Capitalist Shrugged (talk • contribs) 17:28, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manny Santos

If the vandalism (and that includes made up, irrelevant, or clearly erroneous edits) please consider filing a vandalism report at

WP:AIV or let me know and I will do it for you. – ukexpat (talk) 18:21, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I see it has persisted, I will file an AIV report. – ukexpat (talk) 18:22, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay then. I had assumed good faith (perhaps the user was just new to editing, or maybe their additions were mere speculation that must be removed), but obviously the problem has escalated lol. Thanks. - k|e|n|g - t | c - 18:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ENGVAR

Well done for your good work on fixing spelling errors. Remember though that on an article about a UK-based subject like The Verve, we use UK English spelling conventions, like "travelling". Best wishes, --John (talk) 05:03, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh... sorry, my bad. I'm Canadian and was always taught that it was spelt "traveling"... but then again, Canadian spelling is kind of a mixture between American and British. Sorry about that! :-P - k|e|n|g - t | c - 05:08, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I was brought up in Scotland and now live in the US so I am very aware of these things. Keep up the good work, --John (talk) 05:22, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikify Wikiproject

Hi there! Thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify. We're currently recruiting help to clear a massive backlog (14,000+ articles), and we need your help! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends.

——

t • c 13:56, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanks! That looks like my kind of project!! - k|e|n|g - t | c - 14:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hey, just so you know,

t • c 21:07, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanks for the head's up. I thought I was using it correctly; the user had made two consecutive edits that weren't constructive (both edits contained information that was either an opinion, was already stated in the article, or was just too much information), so I used Rollback. I didn't know that Rollback was solely for vandalism. Thanks! - k|e|n|g - t | c - 21:13, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There's a big difference between being unconstructive and 'blatant vandalism.' I witnessed a case a few weeks ago where an admin revoked the right to rollback simply because the user used it to revert a basic NPOV edition. Harsh ——
t • c 06:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Nice

The Excellent Userpage Award
Your userpage is looking very spiffy ——
t • c 21:38, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Why thank-you, my good sir. :-) - k|e|n|g - t | c - 21:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP logo on All Around Amazing Barnstar

The barnstar image you recently uploaded contains the Wikipedia logo, so I've added

talk) 23:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Yeah thanks. I'll have to think of a way to alter the barnstar in some way. Hmm... thanks for the head's up, though! :-) - k|e|n|g - t | c - 03:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong time on last post

Sorry I gave the wrong posting time on the last post. I confused EDT with UTC and mistakedly changed it.

talk) 03:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

No worries! :-) - k|e|n|g - t | c - 03:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your barnstar pic

there is a discussion for the replacement of the image on the creator of barnstars to replace it with your image at

Electrical Experiment 15:42, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Yep, thanks, I'm already aware of that. I was the one who started that discussion on the Talk page lol. - k|e|n|g - t | c - 16:44, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am totally fine with that. It's an image that took me 8 minutes to make. Go right ahead. Meisfunny Gab 17:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank-you! :-) - k|e|n|g - t | c - 17:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I am going aroung taking a survey to see if users I know would support me in a campaign for adminship. If you could post your answer here that would be great. Looking around my userpage could also help make a decision if your having trouble. Thanks! Meisfunny Gab 16:23, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An angel indeed!

You're very nice, and you deserve this barnstar.

talk) 17:30, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Aww thank-you!! :-) - k|e|n|g - t | c - 18:28, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed!

Hi! Me again. I noticed how good your ability to use photoshop and create barnstars on it is, and I was wondering if you'd create the barnstar for my WikiProject. If you look at the main page, you'll notice the main color is navy and the secondary color is teal. If you could create a somewhat catoonish, baseball-looking barnstar using those two colors saying: Seattle Mariners on it, that would be great! I'll create the template and everything, I would just need you to upload an image. I understand if you have bigger fish to fry though. Thanks! Meisfunny Gab 23:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem at all!! Just give me a day or two (it's been busy at work, and I have a lot to do), and I can make one for ya!! :-) - k|e|n|g - t | c - 00:32, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Meisfunny Gab 17:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is this image okay? I tried to go the "cartoony" route like you had requested, but it wasn't appearing very good. I instead made a sleeker Barnstar with the Seattle Marines' logo. Tell me what you think. :-) - k|e|n|g - t | c - 00:43, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's awesome! I love it. Thanks a bunch. Just a minute...


The Seattle Mariners Barnstar
For creating the picture for the much needed Mariners Barnstar, I hereby award it to Angel caboodle. Meisfunny Gab 15:42, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It looks great! And thanks for awarding it to me!! :-) - k|e|n|g - t | c - 15:44, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool enough

Hello. I created the

Eustress (talk) 01:44, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

It sure is! Your barnstar looks great! I just awarded you with the Barnstar Creator's Barnstar just now on your Talk page! :-) - k|e|n|g - t | c - 02:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seattle Mariners Barnstar

It looks nice yes, but its a copyright violation. You have modified a trademarked logo, and are using it in a template. Unfortunately it can not be GDFL/CC licensed, and would have to be Fair Use, and Fair Use images can not be used in templates, userboxes, or awards. Sorry. --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 17:20, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh... okay then. I looked into the logo and it was on Wikipedia, so I figured I could use it. I'll alter the Barnstar when I get the chance. :-) - k|e|n|g - t | c - 17:37, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, didn't mean to come down on ya, but I saw it and red flags went off in my head :) --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 17:48, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ACC Tool

(talk) 22:03, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

(talk) 22:11, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Welcome to the tool! Do you use IRC? If so, #wikipedia-en-accounts connect. On other matters, Mother and Child Reunion (Degrassi: The Next Generation) has just become Featured! Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 01:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I do use IRC! I'll be sure to check that out! And I'm glad another Degrassi article made it to FA status!! :-) — Kendra Michele — 02:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oreo photograph

I was just eating some Oreos and looking them up on Wikipedia while I munched on them when I stumbled across your photo of one. It's a totally gorgeous shot. Good composition and everything. IMFromKathlene (talk) 06:54, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you very much!! :-) — Kendra Michele — 12:58, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

just saying

well season 8 airs in 12 days... why not add the info? im not being mean, just saying —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjleo209 014 (talk • contribs) 22:10, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because any information that has been talked about thus far is only speculation. Wikipedia is not a place for interpretation, subjective ideas, or speculative theories. Until the episode has been aired where Peter is gay or bisexual, it does not have a place on Wikipedia. — Kendra Michele — 22:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ok. and i would like to have help with my signature<color:green>ThE rEaL</color:green><color:yellow> lEo</color:yellow> (talk) 01:13, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, first, make sure your signature was written correctly. Then when in your preferences, make sure you have Raw Signature checked. :-) — Kendra Michele — 01:19, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
thanks! i fixed it and now it works!Do u like itThE rEaL lEo 21:53, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Although having a signature like that is frowned upon here, just saying...——
talk) 21:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Yes, like
Possum said, signatures containing text tHaT iS wRiTtEn lIkE tHiS isn't appreciated on Wikipedia, and I advise you change it. I like the colours, though! :-) — Kendra Michele — 00:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
ok... is it better? Ruffner. 10:50, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it is! Very nice! :-D — Kendra Michele — 16:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!Ruffner. 23:29, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A reminder! Degrassi: The Next Generation season 8 airs in ~1 day Ruffner. 21:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Angel, i have a question. i want to try a RfA, but i don't know how. can you help me--Degrassi. 22:38, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, I'm not completely clear on how to do it either. Why don't you ask my friend
Possum? He'll be able to help you! :-) — Kendra Michele — 18:13, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
thanks for giving me advice on who to go to on how to, but i just looked at my edit count and i have a low chance at succeding.--Degrassi. 21:41, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A [New thing] WikiDollar

Degrassi. 17:40, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you so much!! :-) — Kendra Michele — 18:13, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

screen vs. scene

oops, sorry 71.231.152.17 (talk) 00:37, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all! No worries! :-) — Kendra Michele — 00:50, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Clark

My recent edit of this article is not at all a disruptive edit, I was just adding something that I read in a magazine, and I couldnt find the source. So dont be threatening to block me or anything. Ripper404 (talk) 04:32, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had to remove that bit of information, though, because it's a subjective opinion. Unless you have a source for it, it simply cannot be added to Wikipedia. — Kendra Michele — 13:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah why dont you do the world a favor and pull your lip over your head... and swallow Ripper404 (talk) 03:41, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll do that. And Merry Christmas to you too! — Kendra Michele — 18:11, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:A cat's nose in 2008.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:48, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

NowCommons: File:Close up of an Oreo cookie.JPG

talk) 19:17, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Bad article

Hi I was wondering if you could look through this article List of Degrassi: The Next Generation characters and give some input I look at it and I think its horribly written asking question and making presumptions Im not sure what should be done with it but it asks questions to the reader making it very non-encyclopedic not all are like this just some and it has lines that are completely unecessary The Movie Master 1 (talk) 22:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I don't actually heavily-edit articles on Wikipedia anymore; I have a really busy schedule now, and usually only make edits as I come across them. Sorry! — Kendra Michele — 00:13, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages
.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here
.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :-) — Kendra Michele — 21:36, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Skins characters

Hi there

You recently reverted changes I made to this article, which said that the character called Doug will return for Series 5, making him the only character to appear in every series. I know this was unsourced, but I know it to be true, because I am an extra in Skins and I have spoken to the cast, so I know he will be returning. If that's not a good enough source, that's totally cool, but is there a way I can source that? George.millman (talk) 11:11, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Well, congratulations on being an extra! That's so cool, and I'm completely envious of you!! :-p But unfortunately, that's not a good enough source. The kind of source you need for this is, perhaps, a news bulletin or official Skins blog entry. The information could also be added once the series airs, as it will be evident to all viewers that Doug has, in fact, returned for the 5th series. Good luck! :-) — Kendra Michele — 14:20, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, well that's fair enough I guess. Thanks for the support and advice. George.millman (talk) 22:03, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No problem! :-) — Kendra Michele — 22:33, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Skins

Hello! I just saw you deleted some information on

Skins (TV series). The thing is: this information you deleted have a source, a reference. This is it: http://www.e4.com/blog/skins-news/post/pya9it5ven6bx2ynkkjiwh/view.e4?anchor=comment
I talking to you because i need some help on adding this reference. I don't know how add the same reference for 2 different paragraphs. Thanks in advance! --★Mllb★(talk) 01:54, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know! I'll revert my edit and add that source. :-) — Kendra Michele — 16:12, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Next drive

As you are either a participant of

here, here or here
.

For the December Drive Coordinators, WikiCopter (talk · contribs).

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 23:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Invitation to particpate in the December 2010 Wikification Drive

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 01:45, 30 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Please confirm your membership

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 19:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

The Kennedys

So you are a Mariners fan. I can forgive you that fault... But seriously, the reason i explicitly avoided the word "air" in The Kennedys is because it is being shown on cable channels not broadcast networks. Picky of me? Maybe. The channels are available via satellite too. If you happen to know of anything to expand the production section, maybe a little on the casting, or maybe why this is mini-series was made in the first place then please do. There is so much on early criticism that could be added but trying to not bloat it too much with why people preëmptively hate it leaves little else as from what i have found it is mostly not-publicly-disclosed. If you have any ideas or content please do come back to the article. delirious & lost ☯ ~hugs~ 08:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Haha I only used "air" because the previous phrasing (I believe "shown" was used) sounded awkward. I guess "broadcast" would have been more appropriate. In either case, the grammar of the first paragraph was off, which was my first intention of editing the article. Also, I unfortunately know nothing about The Kennedys other than that it's been abandoned by The History Channel in the States, so I can't really expand the article much. Hopefully more will be added once the series starts. :-) — AngelCaboodle — 14:28, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of "Geoff Mann"

A page you created, Geoff Mann, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our

guide to writing your first article
.

Thank you.   —

(talk) 03:50, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Haha, did I create that page? I don't know who that person is, and I don't believe I created that article to begin with! :-P — AngelCaboodle — 16:27, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Wikipedia title.jpg

A tag has been placed on

section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit

ЛееСуда. 02:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

File:Allaroundamazingaward.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered,

Stefan2 (talk) 17:14, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!
Hi Angel caboodle! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved!

SarahStierch (talk) 00:59, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of List of Deaths in Music

The article List of Deaths in Music has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This duplicates the existing article at List of deaths in rock and roll - a longstanding article, where concerns are discussed on the talk page. "List of deaths in music" is a meaningless and redundant concept for an article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:22, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Deaths in Music, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dave Williams and Chest infection (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carly Craig, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Maxim, Tom Arnold and Vanity Fair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Royal Canadian Geographical Society, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Bateman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

File:Wikipedia title angel caboodle.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wikipedia title angel caboodle.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:23, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Castoria instructions from the 1950s.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Castoria instructions from the 1950s.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes

image description page
.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 09:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016
: Voting now open!

Hello, Angel caboodle. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Angel caboodle. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Angel caboodle. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Angel caboodle. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:WP Seattle Mariners Barnstar.png

Notice

The file File:WP Seattle Mariners Barnstar.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of File:Gatwick airport in January 2008 on plane.JPG

Notice

The file File:Gatwick airport in January 2008 on plane.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Low quality shot of airport terminal. Alternatives available at c:Category:London Gatwick Airport.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Angel_caboodle&oldid=1094567113"