User talk:AnonymousEditor95

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, AnonymousEditor95, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Sadads (talk) 12:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miro Semberac (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 07:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Miro Semberac

article space
.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

userfication
of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

here
.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 08:02, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

A cookie for you!

I saw you'd added links to Day Island and Deer Island from Black Point-Green Point, California. Good job! I thought I'd found all there was to know about those islands. jp×g 12:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! I am flattered, given that you are such a major contributor! AnonymousEditor95 (talk) 11:21, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Miro Semberac

Hello, AnonymousEditor95. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Miro Semberac
".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission
and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 09:22, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, AnonymousEditor95

Thank you for creating The Inkwells.

page curation process
, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:20, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Novato Flatiron Building
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Novato Flatiron Building is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novato Flatiron Building until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MB 19:11, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for your thanks. Are you going to !vote at the above AfD? Djflem (talk) 05:47, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Redwood Landfill

Notice

The article Redwood Landfill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Gets some local coverage, but not enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes

WP:GNG
.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 10:28, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brett Cooper (commentator)

Notice

The article Brett Cooper (commentator) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability under

WP:BLP
on the site.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 12:31, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brett Cooper (commentator) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brett Cooper (commentator) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Cooper (commentator) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

David Gerard (talk) 11:26, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strahlholz railway station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 10:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Zweibrücken railway station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 10:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Teufen AR railway station
moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 10:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Steigbach railway station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 10:30, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Bühler railway station
moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 10:30, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Concern regarding Draft:Strahlholz railway station

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 11:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Concern regarding Draft:Zweibrücken railway station

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 11:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Concern regarding Draft:Steigbach railway station

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 11:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Concern regarding
Draft:Bühler railway station

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 11:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Your draft article, Draft:Strahlholz railway station

Hello, AnonymousEditor95. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Strahlholz railway station
".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission
and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Schminnte [talk to me] 10:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zweibrücken railway station

Hello, AnonymousEditor95. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Zweibrücken railway station
".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission
and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Schminnte [talk to me] 10:56, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Steigbach railway station

Hello, AnonymousEditor95. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Steigbach railway station
".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission
and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Schminnte [talk to me] 10:58, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spetzgarter Tobel
moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to

Spetzgarter Tobel
. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Paul Vaurie (talk) 21:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spetzgarter Tobel has been accepted

Spetzgarter Tobel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 09:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dottenwil Castle has been accepted

Dottenwil Castle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:26, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramschwag Ruins has been accepted

Ramschwag Ruins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 10:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agabama River has been accepted

Agabama River, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - RichT|C|E-Mail 19:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pan sobao (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I don't think the recipe blogs are particularly helpful sources, since they only talk about the recipe and barely nothing else. Personal memoirs are only useful for represent one way to making this bread, so I suggest finding more authoritative sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ca talk to me! 23:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Draft:Ricken Tunnel Railway Accident
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Ricken Tunnel Railway Accident. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:48, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Draft:Ricken Tunnel Railway Accident
has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
Draft:Ricken Tunnel Railway Accident. Thanks! NoobThreePointOh (talk) 17:13, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Concern regarding
Draft:Teufen AR railway station

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 08:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at
Ricken Tunnel Railway Accident
has been accepted

Ricken Tunnel Railway Accident
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette (Merry Christmas, and a happy new year) 15:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, AnonymousEditor95. Thank you for your work on

page curation process
, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alto tunnel has been accepted

Alto tunnel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette (Let's talk together!) 14:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AnonymousEditor95&oldid=1220050674"