User talk:Antonmind

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Antonmind, and

welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions

. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page

, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 06:53, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

MrOllie (talk) 14:02, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

MrOllie (talk) 11:38, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of Investment planning

section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright

infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AeonicOmega talk 05:07, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Investment planning. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. AeonicOmega talk 05:44, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Please consider this a final warning; if you add any more promotional material, including "key word" redirects to software that you apparently have a conflict of interest with, this account will be disabled. Thanks. Kuru ^talk 11:56, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Investment planning

The article Investment planning has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seeks to indirectly promote a software product. Title is too broad for the subject as presented. Recreation of an article by this title which was deleted as copyright infringement. Spamming suspected.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:13, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Articles for deletion nomination of MindDecider

I have nominated MindDecider, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MindDecider. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:17, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I was not kidding with the warning I left you above. You've recreated an article that was an express copyright violation from the same website you have an apparent conflict of interest with and which again appears to promote that entity. Before this account is re-enabled, you will need to address and acknowledge the warnings above. As it is, you appear to be here solely to market this product. Kuru ^talk 11:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]