User talk:Atlan/Archive1

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello there,

• I've looked at your recent edits on the JLU page. I'm not sure about the value of the information you placed, especially the bit about Divided we Fall. It would fit well in a trivia section, not in the series overview. I'll leave it be for a while, perhaps you can work on it, like moving it in a new section. Atlan 12:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

I moved it in the trivia. Thanks for not deleting it. 71.115.231.16 09:15, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the Magic Man edits. I reverted him once and am glad I'm not the only one that wanted to do so. I was thinking about finding some way to compromise, but this seems like the best move. Hewinsj 21:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

• Will do. Hewinsj 03:38, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about the GameSpot/GameStop error. I get them mixed up because of the similar spelling :-p Thanks for noticing it. --  ShadowJester07  ►Talk  03:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I am new to posting on Wikipedia. I am interested in understanding the best way to do so without it being removed as linkspam. I'm a journalist, editor-in-chief and publisher in Chicago. I don't make money off HollywoodChicago.com. I just want to share interesting film content that I am originating with the Wikipedia community. --AdamFendelman 17:26, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

I appreciate your guidance. Perhaps I'm failing to post correctly in the right spots.

As for the content I'm linking to, it's highly legitimate, highly original and overall is high-quality content. If you've read any of it, I'm confident the major of people would agree. Actually, I fail to see how it's dissimiliar at all to most of the content being linked to on the pages of many of these films, filmmakers and actors.

It'd help me tremendously if you could visually show me an example of what an appropriate post to such content would look like. I learn by seeing and then doing. That way, we won't have to go back and forth with deleting, trying again, deleting, trying again, etc. Thank you for your time. --AdamFendelman 23:21, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

My apologies. I certainly didn't mean to change your vote. I think we were both editing the page at the same time and I accidentally wrote over your changes when I added my vote. It was certainly completely inadvertent, not vandalism. I would ask you not to jump to a conclusions of malicious action when things like this happen. Cheers, --Crunch 20:31, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

The premiere date thing is starting to get on my nerves. --

12:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Non admins area allowed to close AFDs if the article has already been redirected, Speedy Deleted or merged. I was merely following policy. The Placebo Effect 02:11, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

I had understood it to mean that if it can be ended by a non-deletion method that has already happened, it can be closed by a non-admin. Since that happened, I assumed it was safe to close it. The Placebo Effect 20:21, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

I have put a strike through my vote (to keep) the scary movie 6 page. Im sorry i didnt before.  GTAGeek123  talk  22:06, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I had no idea it was talked about. I just assumed that it would be unnecessary to have on the same page twice (I also assumed that the TP picture would be used for the main one; clearly, I was wrong, not that I mind where any image on that page goes). Thanks for referring me to the talk page "if I didn't like it", btw.

04:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Whoops, my bad. o^_^o

12:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

I have asked repeatedly for a specific example of what you consider to be appropriate. Instead, I keep being sent to massive pages of documentation. I read this documentation and try to take its advice and people still come back and say I'm linkspamming.

I fail to see the difference from what I'm doing as compared to the content cited by any other journalist. As a reminder, I am a longtime journalist and have nothing to sell.

So this doesn't keep happening, can you take the last post I made that you flagged as linkspam and specifically show me what would be appropriate? --AdamFendelman 18:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

That Web site doesn't "gain" me anything. It's a public repository of information. It's a project I do on my own time because people enjoy the content. If you were to look at the content (if you haven't already), perhaps you'd understand.

It's high-quality, highly unique content that most people can't originate. Are you saying journalists aren't allowed to post information to the sites on which they publish? How else can reporters add information on Wikipedia? --AdamFendelman 19:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• Hope ur well. Here's an article that came out in the New York times yesterday regarding LIVE FREE OR DIE HARD. Give a little more of the story and how it came about. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/23/movies/23hard.html

All the best DM (Davimarc 07:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC))

You shouldn't have deleted my comment about the animation.The article on south park has a section dealing with the type of style the show is animated in, and I was pointing out something unique about its animation that could be included in that section,but I suppose it is also a positive thing about the show. Rodrigue 15:43, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Please dont delete the article on that person.It does no matter if it seems like most of the content has been covered, he was a notable person and there deserves to be an article on him.You can help expand it if you want Rodrigue 19:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean he was only notable because of the desease?.Wikipedia has many examples of articles of people who were created only after a current event, for example Seung-Hui Cho.

And I did not just chose to ignore him, I spoke to

.

I saw his answer to my post, and the reason I still recreated the page is he gave no real argument to mine about how his claim the

article violating Wikipedia policy was false,like I explained.

And what do you mean "despite what other people think", so far you and him are the only people who have given support for deleting it,and that is hardly "people".But on the 2007 tuberculosis scare talk page people talked about why it was deleted.And when I recreated the article, User:Suicidalhamster fixed a typo on the page [2], showing his first responce wasn't to delete it.So there hasn't been a real third-party discussion, so don't say people support his idea. Rodrigue 16:41, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Well maybe I would have been better to just bring this up with him, but really some third-party discussion would be more helpful, as I don't think he'll just revert his own block.Perhaps the Users I quoted weren't the best examples, but you claimed that I was doing something people disagreed with when noone really discussed it yet, wich is what I intend to do. Rodrigue 19:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. Alientraveller 10:53, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Okay, first off back off. I never said he wasn't well known i said his works don't really fit in the "famous" category except "I, Robot" which just makes the list. Stop assaulting me for no reason. I'm going to be watching you now to make sure you don't falsely accuse anybody else, and will report you for wikiabuse if you continue to do so. No hard feelings otherwise. Hardwoker111 02:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

You haven't been listening to what I said.I agree that its a fair policy, but on

did not need to be limited by the policy,because his notability isn't about being in the news,its about being the first man quarantined since 1963, and having rare grug resistant tuberculosis.

Like the policy says,

17:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Bad English

Hello,

My English ... correctable (this section corrected on June 12) when I write in article, and less understandable when I'm involve in an edition war, like I did 2 days before. (This edition war was the "mirror-answer" to Exploding Boy.)

I have to face a skilled English administrator, in his mother language. It's difficult to match =.="

I continue because I seen how he work : I seen he talk and comments his edits in a "good faith" way, but edit and revert in an other "busy & hasty" way, which is not acceptable too long.

Did you know that this opposition started more than one month before (~30 march), and in all this month he reverted me only by saying that my edits were not pertinent. After further involvement and explanations from me, and after edits of user:Dragonebones, he stopped to revert the section I added, and then started to say my spelling don't allow me to add/change content.

Say that I have a bad spelling and that I was disruptive is really convenient and easy, but his true opposition is not on spelling : he is the former writer of the article I want totally re-write, and he have no more the level need.

--Yug (talk) 16:46, 14 June 2007 (UTC)<this talk aim mostly show that my english is not about 5/20 , but more about 11.5/20 ;]>

(re) I was just trying to emphasize with his perspective, however there are instances where people have taunted him. For an example, see here. "Quit with the threats, young man, I get scarier things than you free with my breakfast cereal." This was in response to the perceived threat by Kim, "Be careful on which user page you are directing your comments to." I don't quite understand what Kim was saying here, but it was in responses to an earlier inflammatory comment by Greg.[3] In both cases, Greg was assuming bad faith and posting effective flamebait.

Please note, I'm not condoning Kim's actions. I think I might understand them, however. I believe we can still assume good faith on Kim's part. –Gunslinger47 03:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)