User talk:Awadhesh.Pandey

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:57, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Krant M. L. Verma, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Indian and Verse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've been adding Krant M. L. Verma's poems to various articles on English and Hindi Wikipedias -- please note that Wikipedia accepts only GFDL and CC-BY-SA-compliant content, so this is a copyright violation. Plus, even if these poems were available under a free license, Krant ML Varma or his poems are not notable enough to deserve a place in unrelated articles -- Wikisource would be a better place for these. utcursch | talk 06:34, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. I will take care in future. Thank you for sincere guidance.

Awadhesh.Pandey (talk) 06:42, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Krant M. L. Verma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rampur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Akhilesh Yadav, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sitush (talk) 07:42, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you and Krantmlverma appear to be determined to continue adding inappropriate images, links and other content to various politics-oriented articles. You really should stop doing this. - Sitush (talk) 07:45, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from

Hello Sitush, I am trying to contribute and doing some valueadd in wikipedia and need help of you all. I did modification on the page and corrected few errors, but seems you reverted back. I am not able to understand how to proceed.

Please guide.

My edit summary read "Reverted good faith edits by Awadhesh.Pandey (talk): Inappropriate removal of maintenance templates - still no page number, why is Facebook reliable etc."

• Maintenance templates, such as the {{COI|date=May 2012}} that you removed, are intended to aid in improvement and review of the article - you should not remove them without addressing the issues that are raised or giving a valid reason for removal. In this instance, the issues were not addressed and there can be no valid reason as long as you are the major contributor. It is obvious to any experienced editor that you have some sort of relationship and/or "fixation" (poor word, my apologies) with the subject of the article.
• You also removed some {{cn|date=May 2012}} maintenance templates. In some cases, you did replace the template with a source, as requested. However, https://www.facebook.com/#!/krant.verma/info is not a
  reliable source
  . Facebook rarely ever is reliable in the Wikipedia sense.
• Furthermore, you removed another maintenance template - {{Pn|date=May 2012}} - but did not provide the page number etc that are required. Please read WP:Citing sources.

To be honest, I am not sure that you should be editing this article at all because of the apparent

conflict of interest. There is also the issue that the subject of the article is a Wikipedian - Krantmlverma

- has displayed a similar inability to comprehend even the most basic of our policies and guidelines (and is getting no better, despite being around for a long time). That user has not contributed to this article, which is a good thing, but I do wonder whether he may be unwittingly leading you astray with comments made off-wiki.

Finally, an issue that is unrelated to my revert. "Krant" seems not to be M. L. Verma's name but rather an

honorific, just as "Professor" or "General" would be. Is this correct? - Sitush (talk) 16:57, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Hellow Sitush!

As I have already mentioned in the INTRODUCTORY PARA of this article, the word "Krant" is the pen name of Dr. M.L.Verma. His full initials in Hindi are Dr. Madan Lal Verma 'Krant'. In English I have used Krant M. L. Verma as per engish wekipedia guidelines. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:STAGENAME#Nicknames.2C_pen_names.2C_stage_names.2C_cognomens here. So far as citations or page numbers etc are needed I will incorporate as early as possible. Thanks, Awadhesh.Pandey (talk) 06:51, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Further, I have edited this article using wiki norms [1] and [2] as suggested by Siddharth Ghai on its talk page earlier on 12 March 2012. Kindly check it and remove the tag from the article. Awadhesh.Pandey (talk) 09:20, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 17:32, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

After what was really far too long, I have blocked

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Krant M. L. Verma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page VRS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:40, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shahjahanpur district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MLA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see that you are back again, promoting Krant M L Verma and Bismil. Since you have in the past admitted to an association with Verma, might I again suggest that you desist from making these edits. You have a

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krant M. L. Verma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krant M. L. Verma (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBG^converse 11:54, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]