User talk:Backedupinfo

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jonah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ben Ben (talk) 06:23, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The edits I made to the

and view the section labeled 'jaws and teeth'. Sperm whales don't chew or tear up their food, in fact they swallow their food whole. Also without an upper pallet of teeth it would be difficult to do anything but. Also they eat 400lb. squid, saying they can't on one page and then on saying they can on their own page is ridiculous.Backedupinfo 06:57, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

• I am afraid your personal experience is not a
  blocked from editing. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 08:05, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• You have just violated the
  blocked from editing unless you cease editing the article immediately. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 08:12, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• I have now
  reported you for revert warring. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 08:36, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Don't make unwarranted accusations against other users. I am NOT Ben Ben (talk · contribs). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 08:54, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I get that you have personal opinions on this. I am sorry that the true facts don't fit with those opinions. But honestly that has happened to me many times while I got my first few degrees and still happens today. It is part of learning. The important thing is that you continue learning. Don't let personal beliefs get in the way of that because then you become close minded and stop learning.

--Backedupinfo 09:04, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

• For the second time, stop accusing me and/or Ben Ben of sockpuppetry. Just like
  personal attacks. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:13, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

/Sigh you don't think that telling me I should 'read it twice' is the same thing? Or how about indicating that I was saying Jonah was a squid or a molusc when it was obvious I was only providing quotes.

Be careful here, if you can actually get me banned for that, I would imagine they can read your posts as well.

--Backedupinfo 09:34, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

• The main point is that the reference must directly support the claim you want to make in the article. Making inferences not actually present in the source would constitute
  original research or synthesis
  . You really need to review the policies of Wikipedia:
  • what constitutes a reliable source
    )
  • No original research

Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:53, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• From
  blocked if you continue. Mike Rosoft or User:Ben Ben should have started a discussion at Talk:Jonah where all interested editors may express their points and discuss the references presented. If you find yourself in any similar situation in the future, please availe yourself of the Discussion link at the top of every page. - 2/0 (cont.) 16:11, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

A tag has been placed on

.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Derfel73 (talk) 10:25, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You accidentally placed the report in mainspace, so I went ahead and moved it. I cleaned it up a little to conform to the normal nomination. MrKIA11 (talk) 10:52, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, I am new to Wikipedia and I am still learning --Backedupinfo 19:11, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Take your cases to Talk:Sperm whale or Talk:Jonah. More people will be able to help you there.

And

, and should not be used in an article.

And I suggest you listen to Ben Ben and Mike Rosoft on watching your words.

]

Disclaimer after seeing the

★_☭ 00:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply

]