User talk:Basicallymadness

Welcome!

Hello, Basicallymadness, and

welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions

. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles

Article Wizard

if you wish)

Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! (John User:Jwy talk) 00:58, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

March 2009

Since you have now registered, what I was going to post to the anonymous user page will go here.

No, articles still need citations to be encyclopedic. You're correct that a personal letter cannot be cited - and all I'm asking for on the Bollier one is some evidence that the man exists as a physician in a published article. The responsibility falls to you to provide this - I have searched medical boards in the U.S. and Canada. With regards to the journal, I am highly knowledgeable about the publishing field and while, if this person exists (again, I have yet to see any proof of this), even if he is the next designated editor, until he officially takes over according to the journal, the previous editor is the editor. Right now what you are providing basically original research, which is not allowed according to the wikipedia policy - see

WP:NOR. Again, provide an independent, published citation, and we're good. Lcarscad (talk) 01:44, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

regarding Thomas Bollier

Although I don't like your user-credo (it is decidedly un-wiki), I see no harm in providing a copy of the deleted article which you may find

deletion review anyway (and FYI, the user above was not the one who deleted the article). Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 06:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Hmmm, the point in undeleting wasn't that you should recreate the article on the spot; perhaps a little help can come from

this here. Have a look especially at the sections about notability and sourcing. I've redeleted the article; work on the one in your userspace at your leisure, and let me know when you're done with it. Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 06:38, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 19:51, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

AfD nomination of Thomas Bollier

What Wikipedia is not

").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

sign your comments

with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

articles for deletion

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a

talk) 01:11, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Specify?

I'm not sure what you are requesting with the "specify" tags? Could you update at Talk:Colby College what the problem is? (John User:Jwy talk) 20:49, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm DoorsAjar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Lamorinda because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DoorsAjar (talk) 22:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]