User talk:Benleg4000

Hello, Benleg4000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard David Gasser is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard David Gasser until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CNMall41 (talk) 23:24, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for this article, but please be careful including

A tag has been placed on IconoLand, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See
  Wikipedia:FAQ/Business
  for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

]

Orphaned non-free image File:IconLand logo.png

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:49, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chozun

Hello Benleg4000,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Chozun for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Xevus11 (talk) 13:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

I noticed you tagged "Hito Shizuku" with Template:More citations needed. The article is already sourced properly, so I will be removing the tag. If you would like to discuss this more, please use Talk:Hito Shizuku. Thanks! lullabying (talk) 17:30, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

https://www.britannica.com/topic/anqa

http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00ghalib/001/1_04.html?

also you can see:

book: Wafayat al-aʼyan volume 3 page 89

Google Book

Google Book 2

Anqa

Do you have arabian translator?

so the he/she can explain arabian text

and correct spelling mistakes

أبو السعد 22 (talk) 20:48, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Harper's Magazine, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted

.

• The lead is shorter, and addresses less salient points than it did when the tag was added. Please don't remove maintenance tags without addressing the highlighted concern(s). Begoon 02:54, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 09:37, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sales Pop (magazine)

Hello, Benleg4000. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sales Pop

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 08:45, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]