User talk:Bharel

The 
guide to formal mediation
, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 7 August 2016.

The 
mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution
.

Hello Bharel. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of

@

BangJan1999 Yeah sure, but G11 that you've added is for advertisement. What is the equivalent of A11 for draft namespace? I've put G1 first but it doesn't seem to suit either. Bar Harel (talk) 23:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

There isn't one.

BangJan1999 00:03, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

@

BangJan1999 well it clearly qualified for speedy deletion, but I guess the self-advertisement clause was the one you chose to delete it with, and I agree that it might suit the most. Thank you and keep up the speedy work 😊 Bar Harel (talk) 00:10, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, you reverted some minor vandalism earlier today: | diff

The ip editor who posted this vandalism has just today returned from a 3-day block for disruptive editing. I don't know how vandalism is reported normally, but will the admin responsible for the block (or any other admin) automatically be notified of this vandalism and which ip was responsible? Thanks. Dcs002 (talk) 00:13, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:AIV. Do you want to try it and contact me if you need help? All the best, Bar Harel (talk) 00:26, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I'll do it in a couple hours. (I'll be busy for a while.) The vandalism was from the same ip range that had been blocked,, and which the disruptive ip editor had been using, and the actual ip that made the vandalistic post did so on one of their more common sites of activity. Also, looking at the specific ip's history of posts today, they are all on the same pages the disruptive ip editor had been active (and disruptive) on, and though their comments have been mostly more practical, some have followed the same patterns that we saw previously. I just think that frank vandalism on the first day back from a block is serious. Thanks. Dcs002 (talk) 00:46, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I reported the incident on the AN/I discussion that was still open concerning the ip editor. (I thought it would have been closed by then.) Today I read in that discussion the ip editor admitting to being the same person, and to the vandalism. They were blocked for another 30 days. I thought you should know. Take care, and thank you for your work here. Dcs002 (talk) 03:48, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dcs002 Thank you for taking care of Wikipedia, and letting me know. Have a great week 😊 ~~~~ Bar Harel (talk) 03:51, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was the IP editor >:) Oliver fry42 (talk) 16:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Oliver fry42 Oh hi! Welcome! Are you the one from yesterday? :-) Bar Harel (talk) 16:53, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bharel. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Keep up the good work! 話して～! ) 02:59, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply ]

Awwww! 😊 Thank you my

friend! I was worried at first because it's usually a bad sign when you receive a message on your talk page while reverting edits, but I was happily surprised ❤️ Bar Harel (talk) 03:05, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I made that edit in order to put all the scops owls (Otus) together, as is done with all of the other genera in that article.2600:1700:B570:3BD0:C9D9:D387:D573:FE3E (talk) 18:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@user:2600:1700:B570:3BD0:C9D9:D387:D573:FE3E Oh alright, sorry. Do you need help organizing the section? It just looked liked you're putting random words in the article. Maybe it's better to use appropriate headings? Keep up the good work, Bar Harel (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I publish truth I am not vandalizing, my publish is eyewitness based— Preceding unsigned comment added by Odinaka1 (talk • contribs)

@

WP:manual of style. Bar Harel (talk) 03:27, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I don't think that will be happening. Drmies (talk) 04:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:AGF is not a myth. Thank you Drmies for all of your work today. I see you just about everywhere. Kudos. Bar Harel (talk) 04:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Ha, we may just share some interest. I said "I don't think that will be happening" because I blocked the account, and a couple of others related to that article--there was some serious socking going on as well. One of them started a draft for a new and improved version, which was clearly a COI creation and a puff piece. Thanks for helping keep the place clean. Drmies (talk) 15:14, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bharel… I was adding Sky ‘Willie’ Stern from Venice as the drummer that joined Beowulf in August of 2018. He was added in order to make the live performances possible as Rich Rowen wasn’t able to make the majority of upcoming dates. Sky left that position in 2019. DxBx Simmz (talk) 01:43, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You added "DB Simmz". Who is that? Bar Harel (talk) 02:41, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the

contentious

. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

nableezy - 23:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -

Please don't copy a sentence from a source and paste it directly into Wikipedia, as you did here. See also Wikipedia:Copyright violations and Wikipedia:Copyrights. Thanks DFlhb (talk) 17:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really a copyvio, the sentence you've put instead is not what the source says. According to CNN themselves it is because he was present in the attack. We can rephrase it or quote them directly if we wish. Bar Harel (talk) 19:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover you wrote that they said it, they never did. They raised questions. Bar Harel (talk) 19:44, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]