User talk:Bigdaddy1981

Welcome!

Hello, Bigdaddy1981, and

to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

]

Cynthia Dall

You've tagged this article for deletion on the basis of Dall not being a "charting" musician, but I reverted it. Wikipedia happens to contain many musicians with no charting albums and singles, but are noteworthy on a national or even world-wide level. If you could be more specific about your concern about the article, we can address it. Hawkbreeze (talk) 03:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to try Googling for the Finnish name. I've moved the article to the new name. DS 13:30, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right about the non notability of these 'Respect' functionaries. Most of these [1] could go don't you think? Nick mallory 03:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...creating a

]

User:Bigdaddy1981, I noticed you tagged this article for deletion because it appeared to be an advertisement. If you could be more specific about your concern, I would be happy to try to address it. I think you may be using the advertisement tag too liberally, as this article is well referenced and doesn't speak of bargains or special offers. I have made several contributions to this article and have no affiliation with the company. In fact I'm not even one of their customers. I do have their jingle permanently in my head due to their heavy advertising. Clerks. 16:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bigdaddy, Can you see if this article is really OR or just being railroaded? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Influence_and_activism_of_J._K._Rowling Thanks, Libertycookies 17:47, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You recently tagged this as a blatant copyright violation, but I couldn't find where the violation was in the pdf that you linked to. I removed the speedy delete tag, but maybe you could be clearer if you still think this was a copyright violation. Sancho 03:20, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I added to the case you raised here. This included making some edits to your prior text, so I thought it best to inform you. Regards, — BillC ^talk 15:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article has recently come up for deletion and you voted for its deletion. I have since re-written the article and think that the article is now good enough to remain on Wikipedia. If you could have a look at the article and re-consider your vote it would be much appreciated. A-Dust 11:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On the AfD discussion you said keep, based on notability. However, I just checked the sources: Two were articles in the Japan Times that promote the Union. Another was a classified ad, and the final one was an event listing. None of these satisfy

and have been deleted. Please look through the history and check for yourself.

The three remaining sources are duplicates of those on the NUGW page. I don't know if you live, or have lived in Japan, but this person is simply not notable at all, and it appears that Union supporters are stuffing the page with bogus links to make him appear more notable than he actually is. I would like to ask you to reconsider your review of the page. Best regards. -- Sparkzilla talk! 17:02, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI. Sparkzilla is the self-declared publisher of

WP:CANVAS activities. Just a heads-up David Lyons 17:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Slut Night

When you get a chance, take a look at the work Benjiboi did on Slut Night. And consider reviewing your non-vote? -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 14:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated per suggestions at the atheists page. I actually don't care if it's deleted or kept but a discussion should be put through so that people don't complain about the removal of ethnic and religious lists like it. Bulldog123 20:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Kirill 02:38, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

here is a decent Martin Walker page, so it doesn't make any difference if he is on Wiki or not www.whale.to/b/walker_h.html Chhers! john

Congratulations. Bigdaddy1981 19:39, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for establishing that he was a notable man, which just goes to prove the calibre of anti-vaccine people. john

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Wandalstouring 09:04, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of lists are being re-nominated separately from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Portuguese Americans such as List of Swedish Americans and List of German Americans. Some need some reason explanations. :-/ Bulldog123 03:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

I added significant information to this article. I think this article can now stay on wikipedia.Cmmmm 14:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

• I've rewritten the article on Bob Holman to remove the ad tag you'd placed in August; let me know what you think! Randomdeanna 16:48, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Excellent, glad you liked the rewrite. I've removed the advert tag; let me know if you object. (Also made some quick corrections to timeline things I had wrong in the first paragraph!) Randomdeanna 21:59, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've no objections at all - looks much better. Bigdaddy1981 23:06, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:03, 8 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

This AfD might interest you, I notice you have had similar problems before with the Thermoeconomics article. Tim Vickers 23:55, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was surprised by some of your comments at this AfD; for the sake of

, can you remove the bad stuff? Thanks.

For what it's worth, I'm no fan of this person and I agree with that article's deletion; I'm just concerned about the BLP part.--A. B. ^(talk) 17:43, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it. Bigdaddy1981 19:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --A. B. ^(talk) 20:03, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 13:32, 3 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The

]

Persecution of early Christians by the Jews

I noticed you participated in the

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)

The

]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! TomStar81 (Talk) 01:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)

The

talk) 23:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)

The

talk) 03:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The

talk) 00:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The

talk) 00:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The

talk) 00:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

This 'n' that

Good work sleuthing Dirk Hooper,

this

.

SAS smells expensive. Does it do things you need to have done and that Arrr doesn't do, or does it have some other major benefit(s) for you? (I'm thinking of "getting into" Arrr -- which I'm sure will do all that I need it to do -- during summer, but don't want to find that I've rather wasted my time.) -- Hoary (talk) 03:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

• • Thanks(!). R will do just about anything you want and it has the advantage of being open source. SAS is extremely expensive and is inferior to Matlab in many ways --- specifically if you want to build linear non-regression models. However, it is the standard in both biostatistics and litigation consulting so I am stuck with it. I don't think you will waste time on R but you should be aware that you might have to use SAS in some professions. That said, its really easy to learn as its a high level 'language'. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 18:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Books by Amory Lovins

Hi. Would you care to make some changes to these book articles, so they are less like an ad, or just indicate where changes are needed... thanks... Johnfos (talk) 19:27, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

The

talk) 18:01, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Riograndense Republic

Nice catch with that source, I've changed my vote given we can now

verify the information, and indeed that it existed. There does seem to be an ideological debate going on, but given the contrasting !votes, there's no way this article can be deleted by any admin, it looks most likely that it will head towards a no consensus and therefore be kept. - Toon⁰⁵ 22:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Removed prod from Christa Campbell

I have removed the {{

prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! -- Atama^chat 18:21, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Sullivan (director)

Per your note on the AfD page, please check HERE. I have definitely found enough so I can prove notability and improve the article. It will be fun to bring this article into line. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 19:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I think I done good Bigdaddy! Now just a matter of a touch of cleanup at the Tim Sullivan article. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 22:45, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree -- good work. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 23:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks! Glad to help. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 00:18, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Kobin

Well... I think I have shown a minor notability HERE. I cleaned up the article and found a number of external links, and started citing the first paragraph. Enough to move over? Comments? Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 06:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do think the original filmology section was simply a poor list. Those works are easily covered in the career section. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 06:26, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

The

talk) 00:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

NeuroBayes

Have a look at the Slides, the short, or long paper. Gunnar (talk) 21:07, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

talk) 07:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The

talk) 21:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

The

talk) 22:32, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The September 2008

talk) 21:19, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The

talk) 21:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

The

talk) 23:28, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

The

talk) 15:58, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

The

talk) 02:07, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The

talk) 03:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The

talk) 21:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The

talk) 18:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The

talk) 00:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)

The

talk) 02:00, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)

The

talk) 22:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Plant and Garden wiki

Hi Bigdaddy1981, I'm writing to you because you've edited many of the plant articles. I wanted to let you know about a plants-specific wiki site which you might be interested in contributing to. The site focuses specifically on how to grow any plant. Since Wikipedia is

not a how-to, and articles are not allowed to be written as a guide on how to grow plants, two years ago I started http://www.plants.am

- a wiki solely to address that topic (much like how wikitravel.org is solely to advise tourists visiting a country or city on their destination).

An example of how the sites differ can be seen immediately by comparing the Wikipedia article on Tamarind, with the Plants.am Tamarind article. Many of the articles currently on the site are placeholder articles taken from Wikipedia which are being rewritten from scratch, or shells of articles using new templates. However, a core of new articles like the Asparagus article (which still has a lot of room to grow) are being created, and the undertaking is huge. Perhaps you have some materials you can add which are not appropriate for Wikipedia. If you have any questions at all about this new resource, feel free to contact me on my user page here or on Plants.am. Thanks! --RaffiKojian (talk) 20:53, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MASH AfD

Hi, I see you voted at one of the MASH AfDs. there are a number of others, you may want to consider their AfDs as well. ThuranX (talk) 00:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

The

talk) 22:14, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Bob Allen

Just as a courtesy, I thought I'd let you know that I've restored the conviction section to the article. That said, I'm extremely careful regarding BLPs, and as such, I've commented out the section from public view for now. I'll work on the article, and the section, to ensure the article does not violate our BLP guidelines, but removing that section, at the present time, would omit any mention that he was in fact convicted. Feel free to respond on my talk. Best,

Help us mediate! 22:34, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Yes, certainly, the article needs to be more balanced. Sources for this politican, however, are few and far between. Could you help me find some, and put them in a sandbox? Ie,

Help us mediate! 22:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Sure --- I will see if something more can be found on this chap. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 22:45, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Swancookie matter at AN/I

In yet another Clint Catalyst/buzznet related dispute today,

WP:AN/I. I doubt you want any more involvement with this tarpit (who would?), but I thought you should be alerted to the situation. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

For the record- I NEVER insinuated an anti-"LGBT" bias! Hullaballoo Wolfowitz that's a complete lie. I take great offense to this accusation! I need to discuss a LGBT matter that's separate from my issue with HW. Swancookie (talk) 17:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I should hope not --- I certainly have no anti-LGBT bias and I daresay you will never find one in my editing here. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 17:53, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assassination market your PROD and subsequent AfD nominations

I understand your reasons, and the topic is sick, but there sure are sources if you dig a little below the surface. best Power.corrupts (talk) 17:54, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)

The

talk) 21:26, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Shell to Sea

Someone is going to revert you. It won't be me, but I know that someone will. That said, the article was way too full of POV material, but it will be reverted.

The clock is ticking.... 23:27, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm sure, it was such a damned mess though. The subject is notable; but the article was stuffed with unsourced claims, wild allegations and what seemed to be a meandering day-by-day account of the thing. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 23:56, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see Steve got here with the same message as me, as it stood the article had a lot of serious problems but some info may need to be reintroduced back into it. GainLine ♠ _♥ 11:52, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paige Railstone

Hi. On the AfD page for

canvassing: aren't there a couple of letters missing? Regards, Favonian (talk) 11:15, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

OOOps --- my foolish error! Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 22:44, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Garda Siochana

Agreed, what I would say is that you maybe apply strongly the guidelines on referencing. I Have been doing that by insisting anythng that makes a claim that is contentious is backed up by a very reliable mainstream ref Eg Irish TImes etc. GainLine ♠ _♥ 08:39, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)

The

talk) 18:53, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Corrib gas controversy

Hi I'm doing a bit of work on this. In my opinion this should bbe the main repository of controversial info on Corrib. I've made a start. What do you think. i Think the project stage should concentrate on the technical, bbenefits etc. as per your layout. I think the Shell to Sea early details should be transferred to controversy and only a synopsis put there and the (garda)policing page merged.??? Cathar11 (talk) 22:26, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Corrib gas project article looks really well now, good work. GainLine ♠ _♥ 10:58, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Collapsing abuse by SPA re vanity pages
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Eric Leiser Again, you have provided no proof as to why you took down the information for Eric's professional and solo art shows besides an ignorant notion that he was a student showcasing in a hallway at Goldsmith's. If you respect Wikipedia at all, you will let sleeping dogs lie. Jeffrey Leiser You have no proof in shutting down Jeffrey's page beyond a personal bias. If you respect Wikipedia at all, you will supply proof as to why you put that tag on there. Please be a human being and try to show some compassion. You're acting like a tyrant. P.S. on the "crystal ball claims" - Jeffrey has already scored music for a major commercial which hasn't aired yet. I assure you the link will be provided. And the "Seed" IMDb page was very recently taken down for unknown reasons. There is nothing fictitious on the page. The internet is not an "end all" - life occurs outside of it, you know. Firstly, it is not "his" page. Secondly, I have no personal knowledge of him (or you -- I suspect you are the same) at all and thus have no personal bias, thirdly I am not "shutting it down" I am suggesting to the Wikipedia community that he is not notable. The decision of whether to delete the page is not mine. I can only give my views. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 17:34, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Wikipedia editors decided to keep the Eric Leiser article and I suspect they will do the same for Jeffrey - which means a lot of wasted time on your part with no equanimity reached. The amount of hate involved in seeking the destruction of such simple pages for independent artists who have obviously achieved much in an already tough world and the time you have taken in attacking them causes me concern for you as a human being - I pray that you find peace within. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Albinofawn (talk • contribs) 05:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Please desist from posting personal abuse on my talk page. You hyper-aggressive style will win you no friends. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 17:58, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] PLEASE STOP CHANGING INFORMATION AND MUTILATING EVERY SINGLE PAGE OF ERIC AND JEFFREY LEISER AND RELATED PAGES - How dare you attack someone that way - you should be reported for abusing the system by changing every single page and removing valid information AGAIN and AGAIN. Stop wasting your time and get a life. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Albinofawn (talk • contribs) 06:37, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CPGB-ML

I object very strongly to the statement you made to the effect that "it is unclear what the party's relationship to the Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist-Leninist) is and if it is designed to replace that party or merely to serve as its electoral vehicle." If you want evidence, take a look at the CPGB-ML YouTube page http://youtube.com/user/proletariancpgbml and you will see the following statement, "Proletarian is the newspaper of the CPGB-ML. It's also our registered 'electoral' name." Other organizations have also had to register under different names, such as the CPGB (PCC), which is registered as "Weekly Worker". So it's not unheard of. I take great exeception to the fact that you cynically imply that Proletarian has been registered as a political party to replace the CPGB-ML. Also, the membership is a non-issue. To be registered with the electoral commission it is a must to have at least three members (the minimum number of officers). It only has three member as it is a shell organisation. Do you understand what this means? If you do, then you will please desist from making changes to this article. Thank you. Troublemaker1949 (talk) 05:25, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I accept your compromise, let's let the article stand as it is.Troublemaker1949 (talk) 03:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, the following is from the "Registering a Political Party: A Brief Guide" published by the UK Electoral Commission in November 2008. http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/68315/Registering-A-Political-Party-Guide.pdf

(page 1) Your registered party name, and any party descriptions or emblems that you register with us, will be protected so that other parties cannot use them, or names that could be confused with them, on the ballot paper.

(page 3) We can refuse to register certain party names. Factors which we must consider when assessing a proposed party name include whether: • it may lead to confusion with the name of another party • it is obscene or offensive • it could mislead an elector as to the effect of his vote, or hinder their understanding of instructions for voting, if appearing on a ballot paper

And this is from "Guidance on Registering as a Poltical Party" published in December 2006 by the UK Electoral Commission. http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/electoral_commission_pdf_file/0004/13495/registeringpolparty_final_23814-6305__E__N__S__W__.pdf

(page 4) A party can register a party name and up to 12 descriptions, each of which is protected for the party’s own use for electoral purposes in the parts of the UK in which it is registered. The Commission can refuse to register a name or description if, in its opinion, it: • is the same as the registered name or any registered description of another party in the same part of the register • is likely to result in electors confusing the name or description with that of another party in the same part of the register

I hope this helps you understand why the CPGB-ML cannot register as the "communist party" and has to use an alternative name.Troublemaker1949 (talk) 06:57, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly are you trying to do? I add a stub that will soon be fleshed out and, all of a sudden, a notice appears that it has been nominated for deletion. Give me a chance please. Troublemaker1949 (talk) 01:35, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Morgan

With your appreciated hint that other "Anna Morgans" existed, I narrowed and refined my serach terms. I have found the character discussed in context to the film, and even found her being discussed as a negative example of a in-film mother in an article about a different film covering a different mother. If you had not cautioned about the author or porn star of this name, I might have given uo too soon. Thanks for the heads-up. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 21:32, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, ok. If you can improve the article or find refs; I'd be glad to change my opinion. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 21:34, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've been adding them and giving it a few tweaks. I just wanted to thank you, as you saved my from following a lot of dead ends. Best, MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 21:59, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought you were being sarcastic. I'll check the updates; and -- as I said -- am glad to revise my view. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 22:01, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leisteria

"lovingly groomed by a host of socks"[2]. Awesome! DMacks (talk) 21:37, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lalkar

What's going on? Why this vendetta? What on earth in wrong with a page about Lalkar? You really do seem to have a problem. Spend more time creating pages than destroying them! Troublemaker1949 (talk) 01:40, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Timewave_zero#Redirect proposal

Notice: You commented in an Article for deletion for

Timewave zero , an RfC has been opened on whether this article should be replaced with Redirect. Please comment on the above link. Lumos3 (talk) 15:32, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)

The

talk) 19:11, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

The

talk) 23:07, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

As a member of the

Operation Great War Centennial

, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up

talk) 17:49, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

The

talk) 17:49, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

The

talk) 03:53, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)

The

talk) 02:39, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

The

talk) 02:59, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

The

talk) 21:05, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

The

talk) 21:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Coordinator elections have opened!

Voting for the

talk) 21:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

OR tag at Badiou

It's not clear to me why you placed that tag on the article. The addition of a few {fact} tags in the body seems straightforward enough, and thanks for doing that. However, discerning exactly which section(s) you believe to be

WP:OR is not easy for another editor. Perhaps a more specific section tag would be appropriate. Or most certainly, some sort of comment on what you perceive the issues to be on the article talk page would help. LotLE×talk 00:21, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

I just added another section to the Badiou discussion page addressing some of these issues.Christian Roess (talk) 22:07, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

The

talk) 21:21, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)

The

talk) 19:05, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)

The

talk) 17:23, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)

The

talk) 18:42, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Anders

I sincerely apologize for the 'idiot' comment; I did not consider my words sufficiently. However, the issue is complex and I ask that you have patience. DS (talk) 22:52, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that -- my edit was intended to be constructive. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 23:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ms Anders has legally changed her name; therefore, the 'Charlie' is not a pen name. There are other details to consider as well. DS (talk) 23:36, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Has she though -- I haven't seen any information re this. If so then its certainly not a pen name. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 23:45, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amber Benson

Please describe on the article's talk page the specific things about the article that makes it to fan-like for you. I have examined it closely, and I see nothing there that would qualify. It seems to me to be a straight-forward and neutral presentation of Benson's career and accomplishments. Please do not re-add the tag until you have explicated your objections. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:59, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced; Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections	Articles Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content
Members July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy	Editorial Opportunities for new military history articles
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here .

This has been an automated delivery by

talk) 21:12, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Dennis Skinner - will you place removed information on Wikiquote as you, yourself suggest?

Hello, I notice you've removed a fair bit of material from Dennis Skinner, some of which you suggest would be better on Wikiquote. I would like to encourage you to place it on Wikiquote since he currently has no page there. What do you think? Please reply here as I will keep an eye on this page. Regards, --bodnotbod (talk) 08:07, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I will -- I didn't know that he hadn't a page. I'll create one then, likely next week when I've a bit of time. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 03:31, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Dennis_Skinner --- its a start. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 06:11, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Big Daddy. Hmm, that felt weird to say. Thank you Mr Daddy doesn't sound much better either :O) Ah well, thank you nonetheless. --bodnotbod (talk) 15:21, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Community restrictions

Arbitration Enforcement case that closed in October 2007, and was amended by community consensus in October 2008. The current restrictions are: All editors on Troubles-related articles are directed to get the advice of neutral parties via means such as outside opinions . All articles related to The Troubles, defined as: any article that could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland falls under revert per editor per article per day). When in doubt, assume it is related. Clear vandalism, or edits by anonymous IP editors, may be reverted without penalty Editors who violate this 1RR restriction may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense. If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the guidelines laid out in the above link. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it on this talk page first.

O Fenian (talk) 08:21, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Imagination (film)

I removed the prod tag you placed on Imagination (film) as the article was prodded on 2 August 2010 and is therefore ineligible for deletion via prod. Compliance with procedure is the only reason I removed the tag; I have no opinion on the merits of its deletion. Please open an AfD if you still believe the article should be deleted. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election	Articles A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound
Members Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants	Editorial In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations
To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section talk) 23:00, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply ]

Email

Can you please enable your email? I need to discuss something with you privately. –MuZemike 22:04, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Milhist election has started!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies ^talk 21:22, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals	Articles A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles
Members Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)	Editorial In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Wikipedia
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section talk) 21:05, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply ]

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 22:01, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 22:02, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the talk) 20:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 15:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 21:15, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 01:18, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 21:56, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 22:09, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,

talk) 22:32, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,

talk) 21:35, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,

this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 17:35, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,

this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 01:54, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,

this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 07:53, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars Review essay: Ian Rose goes to El Alamein Op-ed: DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

The Bugle is published by the

[majestic titan] 20:14, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Military Historian of the Year

Nominations for the "

Military history WikiProject.[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Review essay: Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator Op-ed: Hchc's English Castles

The Bugle is published by the

[majestic titan] 23:44, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Ian Rose discusses article assessments

The Bugle is published by the

[majestic titan] 09:33, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply

]