User talk:Biggerj1
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Langevin Equation
The section caption is "Brownian motion as a prototype" and it starts with "The original Langevin equation...". So there only is one particle in the game, a particle index is misleading and even wrong. The original equation describes the motion of one particle. 109.125.117.198 (talk) 17:27, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Well it would be good for the article if it would also cover (maybe in another section) systems that have more than one (colloidal) particle. Nevertheless please provide the reader a reference for the correlation function. The formula is correct in the article but I think we should provide a reference.--Biggerj1 (talk) 15:05, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Biggerj1. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Biggerj1. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Biggerj1. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 02:23, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
""Quantity equation"" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect "Quantity equation". Since you had some involvement with the "Quantity equation" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 22:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Disambiguation link notification for April 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bias–variance tradeoff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Precision.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pseudoreplication, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page F-ratio.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Biggerj1
Thank you for creating Pseudo-R-squared.
Great work!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Herpetogenesis}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 14:56, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
Storey's q-values and B-H false discovery rates
Hi, I notice you've been quite active on both the false-discovery-rate article and the q-value article. I am very glad that you managed to get Storey-Tibshirani mentioned as a paragraph in the false discovery rate article. My personal belief is that it's so, so closely tied up with the whole concept of FDR that it ought to be discussed properly in the FDR article. In fact I find it very undesirable that we have a separate article on q-values. pFDR and q-values are both historically, and scientifically/mathematically a natural development from Benjamini and Hochberg's original work. But a long time ago, I tried to get it into the FDR article and was politely banished to the "related concepts" section. But because the "related concepts" is basically a very long table, it's not a great place to discuss things in detail, and it doesn't allow for assigning proper weight to the related concepts that are actually widely discussed. I felt there are a lot of ownership issues going on at the FDR article, and wondered whether that's why we have a separate q-value article! I shall be upset if your paragraph gets removed.
The banishing of pFDR to a separate article is based entirely on that critical multiplication by P(R>0), which to those outside the field is somewhat perplexing: in all possible situations where the method will ever be used, P(R>0) must be so, so close to 1 that the difference between pFDR and FDR will only show up at the 5th or 6th decimal place - and this in a test where we set a threshold of "5%" instead of "10%" or "1%" (i.e. we don't really care about whether our threshold is 5% or 4.999996%, so why would we care about an algebraic difference that creates the same sized bias?). But by banishing pFDR, we lose the chance to talk about the graphical interpretation of FDR, which makes a lot more sense to many readers than the original algebraic interpretation, and as a result, we can't talk about any improvements on the original method (i.e. by estimating m0 instead of just using m).
So, if you ever feel that the entire q-value article should be merged into FDR's, I'd be sympathetic. Elemimele (talk) 11:29, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
Disambiguation link notification for December 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Subderivative, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interval.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Cost-sensitive machine learning moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 22:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Dear JTtheOG, I added books and referenced highly cited papers. Biggerj1 (talk) 07:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
February 2024
Your edit to Rank test has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:25, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, it must have slipped my attention that I added exactly the same wordings. Thank you Biggerj1 (talk) 21:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Biggerj1. Thank you for your work on
Thanks for adding new content, but this topic is probably better contextualized within other pages. Note that we don't need a separate page for each term used in a field; see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk) 12:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Product of experts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Partition function.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC)