User talk:Bluedog423
|
Duke University FAR
Non-free use disputed for Image:Duke_logo.PNG
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our
Speedy deletion of Image:JamesDukeStatuewithChapel.jpg
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Duke logo.PNG)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
MIT
Given comments on the previous
- Thanks for your comment. I think any response you might want to leave would be more appropriate on the MIT discussion page rather than my talk page ;) Cheers! Madcoverboy (talk) 19:39, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Biden
To what consensus are you refering? older ≠ wiser 21:50, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- [1] -Bluedog423Talk 23:38, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:FacilitiesMap.JPG
Thanks for uploading
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:53, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
User:Tinlash
Bluedog423, sorry if this is the wrong way to contact you. I have no idea how else to do it. First, thanks for making modifications to the Duke University rankings page. Unfortunately, I don't think the layout is as readable as it could be. I think it would be better to have each ranking (usnews, business week, etc), and then have the individual ranks horizontally by year. This way, it's easier to see how a specific ranking changed over the years. The current way you set it up prevents that. Thoughts? Thanks again. -User:Tinlash
Chicago montages
Thanks. Glad you like the montage idea. Like the Wrigley and the Art Institute options, and maybe a Buckingham Fountain option. The Hancock and the Watertower would throw it off balance, I also experimented with those and ruled out the Watertower alongside the Sears Tower, it didn't seem balanced. Perhaps create variations for the sub articles.Thomas Paine1776 (talk) 23:24, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
AfD for List of Duke University rankings
Image tagging for File:Chicago montage example.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:Chicago montage example.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
- Wikipedia:Image use policy
- Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Article for Duke University Newspaper, The Chronicle, on Duke Wikipedia Page
Hi there! I apologize in advance if this is the incorrect way to communicate with you, but I've never used "talk" before. I'm a rising sophomore at Duke University and am writing an article for the paper on Duke's Wikipedia page, and I had noticed you had edited that article. I was just wondering why you edited the page, if you have any affiliation with the University, and any and all comments you may have regarding the page. Feel free to reach me here, via email: [email protected] , or via AIM: haahaamagician . Thank you very much! Haahaamagician (talk) 18:13, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Chronicle Article Mentioning You
Just wanted to point out you're in a Chronicle article about the Duke University page. Congrats! And continued thanks for all the hard work for the alma mater - DukeEGR93 17:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Ugh
And here I thought we had had all the discussion about not including non-notable or encyclopedic nicknames three years ago. Apparently there's a new anonymazzo who thinks Dook needs another disambiguation fork. See the talk page for details... Any advice on how best to proceed? Fortunately, looks like no one has tried to re-invent Carowhina or Big High School so the precedent is in place. Maybe point folks to the RfM and MedCab links? DukeEGR93 21:59, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Update: looks like the article has been semi-protected for a week's "cooling off" period... DukeEGR93 22:03, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Duke shield.PNG)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "
Congratulations!
Congratulations Bluedog423! Your image Image:NanKeohane.JPG was the Random Picture of the Day! It looked like this:
Former Duke University President Nannerl O. Keohane
Image credit: [[User:Bluedog423 (talk)|Bluedog423 (talk)]] ([[User talk:Bluedog423 (talk)|talk]] · [[Special:Contribs/Bluedog423 (talk)|contribs]])
. - Talk to you later, Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 17:21, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
August 2010
- My edit was not vandalism. It's probably because I removed several references that a bot thought I deleted constructive information, but I simply removed the misleading notations of Duke being actively affiliated with the Methodist Church. Duke certainly has historic and symbolic ties to the church, which are already noted in the article, but currently its governance is independent. See [2] for more information. To quote the key points: "Duke University [...] is an independent and non-sectarian institution [...] [T]he Methodist Church does not own or direct the University. Duke is and has developed as a private non-profit corporation which is owned and governed by an autonomous and self-perpetuating Board of Trustees." I also removed a phrase detailed various rankings in the lead that was unnecessary. -Bluedog423Talk 03:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- I can't *believe* you vandalized the Duke University page, you scoundrel you. Good thing someone came along to let you know what Wikipedia is for :-D DukeEGR93 03:44, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Using some pictures
Hola - just wanted to mention that I've been updating Pratt Pundit and the front page has some of your pictures on it now; hope that's OK. So far, I am using the Fitzpatrick Center, Hudson Hall, and Teer pics. DukeEGR93 17:32, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
File:DukeChapelMorning1.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered,
FAR notice
I have nominated
Nice work on Duke
![]() |
The Article Rescue Barnstar | |
For your hard work in bringing Duke University up to current FA standards. Brad (talk) 23:12, 29 August 2011 (UTC) |
I am just letting you know that as the leading editor at
File:Chicago montage example.PNG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered,
Do you remember where you found WT Gannaway's death date?
If you remember, I'd be curious where you found the death date for WT Gannaway. Thanks! -- 152.3.118.47 (talk) 21:50, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Sulaimon
It is worthwhile to have a discussion as to whether or not the standard for NCAA championship template has changed, so I will start the discussion at
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Bluedog423. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Bluedog423. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
FAR for Duke University
I have nominated
Orphaned non-free image File:JamesDukeStatueAndChapel2.jpg
![⚠](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The file File:Duketemplate firefox.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused Wikipedia screenshot, no other obvious use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:21, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The file File:Duketemplate internet explorer.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused Wikipedia screenshot, no other obvious use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:21, 26 November 2022 (UTC)