User talk:Bobmack89x

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello Bobmack89x, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our

intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions
or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please don't add borderline and irrelevant links to articles'

list of academic disciplines. The See Also section is for closely connected articles that help to understand the present article's topic, not a laundry list of loosely related things. -- Rbellin|Talk 19:03, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
]


Please slow down a bit

Bob,

It's best if you actually read first what you're editing. I need to revert what you are doing at

WP:BLP. Slow and steady wins the race. Happy editing. Smallbones (talk) 17:59, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

May 2009

Please note

May I echo Smallbones' concern above? I have reverted some of your edits because they were unsourced (see

WP:NPOV). I appreciate your work but if it doesn't meet the WP guidelines it will quickly be reverted/removed by others. Please take some time to familiarize yourself with WP's policies. If I can help, let me know. Thanks. Yintaɳ  22:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
]


=

Wikilinking

Hi. I thought it might be helpful for you to read

WP:OVERLINKING to better know what, when and how much linking should occur with articles. Happy editing. Wildhartlivie (talk) 04:21, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

What generally should not be linked

(from

WP:LINKING
)

Unless they are particularly relevant to the topic of the article, it is generally inappropriate to link:

--CliffC (talk) 03:17, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia edits must be sourced

Hi there.

Solntsevskaya bratva. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. QueenofBattle (talk) 22:03, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Linking

Please become familiar with Wikipedia linking guidelines at

WP:LINK. Specifically, linking common words such as "shoes" is unnecessary, and please make sure internal links direct the reader to the correct page. Thank you, momoricks 03:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Additionally, if a term in already included in the text of an article, it is unnecesary to provide a "see also" link for it. It also is against Wikipedia's

manual of style. QueenofBattle (talk) 14:59, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Price gouge

Hi,

I removed your image of a claimed price gouge on some audiovisual equipment.

Firstly, it provided no evidence for what it claims is the real 66 dollar price, and secondly, it comes across as one person's opinion and/or axe to grind about a particular store or brand rather than making clear why it's a good example of price gouging.

No offence, but I think you have to justify its re-inclusion.

All the best, Ubcule (talk) 16:26, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

October 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Sons of Silence. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. tedder (talk) 18:27, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Renewed overlinking

Welcome back from your third block. I have undone this edit to

WP:OVERLINKING
states

What generally should not be linked
Unless they are particularly relevant to the topic of the article, avoid linking terms whose meaning can be understood by most readers of the English Wikipedia, including plain English words, the names of major geographic features and locations, religions, languages, common professions, common units of measurement, and dates.

--CliffC (talk) 23:47, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 2009. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cosmic Latte (talk) 21:02, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Do you also edit as User:Ecosciences? Your edit patterns seem quite similar. --CliffC (talk) 18:23, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No that would be someone else.

Mongols (motorcycle club)

welcome page
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Again, unsourced additions to
Mara Salvatrucha

Bob, you do not seem to be learning anything from past warnings (you delete some, so we know you see them), or your 4 past blocks. Yesterday in 10 separate edits you repeated (diff here) the same behavior, against the same article, you have been warned about again and again. A report about your editing is being filed at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. --CliffC (talk) 03:34, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

talk) 04:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

2008 Barack Obama assassination scare in Denver

What Wikipedia is not
").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

sign your comments
with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

articles for deletion
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a

talk) 01:06, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Suspected copyvio

Hello, and

welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Verizon Hub, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www22.verizon.com/investor/the_home_phone_experience_changes_forever.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked
from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow

Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Verizon Hub saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! The Quirky Kitty (talk) 22:21, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Examples of common measurements include:
    • units of time (millisecond, second, minute, hour, day, week, month, year)
    • metric units of mass (milligram, gram, kilogram), length (millimetre, centimetre, metre, kilometre), area (mm², etc.) and volume (millilitre, litre, mm³)
    • imperial and US units (inch, foot, yard, mile)
    • composite units (m/s, ft/s)
    Links may sometimes be helpful where there is ambiguity in the measurement system (such as Troy weight vs Avoirdupois weight) but only if the distinction is relevant. In an article specifically on units of measurement or measurement, such links can be useful.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bobmack89x&oldid=1051955623"