User talk:Broken nutshell
About my edit in Mustafa Ali article
While I don't agree witch you, If
--NHS2008 (talk) 18:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Recent edits to Eva Marie
Hulk Hogan
Please stop adding unreferenced or
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Broken nutshell! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
- The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
- The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
- The Teahouse new editor help space
- Wikipedia Help pages
- Hi Broken nutshell! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 14:49, Friday, December 30, 2016 (
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Eva Marie Again
Mentioning Titles instead of including dates.
Dear Users,
If you ever left a message on talk page, please Also add the title/subject of the page and section I've edited at that page instead of mentioning dates. Thank You. Broken nutshell (talk) 18:24, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
BLOCK
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User: WarMachineWildThing, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 16:31, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Widr (talk) 16:36, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Taste it
To Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me
If a person I.e Eva Marie is not appearing at TV or anywhere so that doesn't mean we stop editing it. we're doing any unsourced things, you're saying that sourced doesn't mean become source blah blah what the fuck you're saying to me, we're trying to add things for Eva Marie are not unsourced. We're trying to providing valid reference not vandalizing as you're doing to others. Various news have been came but her Wikipedia is still in it's remain position. So please stop telling us what we should do and what we should not do. Things we're adding must be added. I'm saying sourced because I've completely reviewed the things related to her. We've fully read your the BLP Policy so please stop making issues.
It seems that you've divorced your wives and trying to shooting some pornos with them HAHA.
- (edit warring and leaving uncivil messages like the one you left here... you should consider taking time to actually listen to what he was trying to tell you, and read the policies and guidelines that he was linking you to. If you engage in making any more personal attacks towards WarMachineWildThing, your block will be extended. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)]
- Out of that slightly bizarre and possibly offensive tirade, could you clarify one thing: you repeatedly refer to yourself as 'we' and 'us'. Who is that? Cheers, — semper crescis, aut decrescis 06:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)]
As per this edit and this edit, he is going by Mike Kanellis in WWE, not Mike Bennett. --JDC808 ♫ 05:09, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
RE: Paige return
So? A million things could happen between now and when she debuts back on the main roster. A possible return is just speculation at this point and has no place in an encyclopedia. Also, only the first letter of the first word of headers should be capitalized per
]September 2017
This was uncalled for, You're entitled to your opinion but calling someone a "foolish bloody motherfucker." in an edit summary isn't going to end very well for you,
This place is full of trolls and vandals
- Hey, Davey, first of all Apology for my behaviour, second is that If I see any kind of mistake in any page any content especially that relates things which I like in this world especially things relating WWE, and Women_in_WWE, if i see anything that goes negative I'll react but not by this way you've stopped. Third, Kindly add a title on what message you're conveying me so i can get to know about what message I got so please avoid writing dates, instead of it, write the name of topic as I give it title 'ABUSE'.
My page is open for 168(24x7) Broken nutshell (talk) 19:00, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- No worries - We all get pissed off on here at times so easily done,
- As for the title - "September 2017" is nicer than "ABUSE" (For me it's a strong word and you changing it gives the impression I used that title to begin with when infact I didn't), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:18, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
User warning templates
I noticed that at an IP's talk page you sent them a message attempting to replicate a talk page warning template. These can be found at
Neville
My edit says nothing about Neville having been released by WWE. It says he walked out and had been unhappy prior to walking out, both statements are supported by reliable sources. REEEEEbbon Salminen(talk) 15:55, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Broken nutshell. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
December 2017
This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at User talk:ScrapIronIV, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 15:27, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- I'm making allowances for the obvious fact that English is not your first language, but claiming you're involved in a "war of vandalisms" [1] is a bad thing for you to say. You appear to be trying to initiate a discussion, but your apologies are not reading quite the way you may have intended. I strongly suggest that you step back from the subject for a little while. Acroterion (talk) 17:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text ]{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 20:32, 29 December 2017 (UTC) |
WP:RFP
Hey man, why did you delete my RFP and added your instead of adding yours and leaving mine alone[2]? If you'd have any intelligence in you, you'd know by reading the instructions that all you had to do was add your RFP and that's it! You didn't have to delete mine. Next time you do that or anything like that I'll report you. (N0n3up (talk) 20:35, 17 February 2018 (UTC))
:@Mustafa Ali (wrestler).
February 2018
Disambiguation link notification for March 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
@Fylindfotberserk: see the last changes. i've added notes to stop further edit warrings. CK (talk) 12:12, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- This is not how Hidden Texts are to be used. You can't just tell others not to edit an article or claim ownership to an article. See WP:INVISIBLE.
- The subject of the article is of "Pakistani descent" alright. That can be proven with the citation provided. If anybody changes that you can outright revert it. I'll change the "comments" as per Wiki guidelines.
- These following lines are not supported by any of the citations. So they'll be removed for now and in future can be added back with valid sources.
His parents are from Karachi, Pakistan.
- Source mentions his Pakistani descent but nothing about Karachi.During his debut in the Cruiserweight Classic, it was stated by Daniel Bryan that Ali has experience as a local police officer for the area of Chicago that he resides in.
He is married and has 2 children; a daughter and son.
- -Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:44, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
@Fylindfotberserk: the lines added *His parents are from Karachi, Pakistan. During his debut in the Cruiserweight Classic, it was stated by Daniel Bryan that Ali has experience as a local police officer for the area of Chicago that he resides in.
this line only says that his parents are from Karachi not he himself. I know that he was born in Bolingbrook Illinois. if you're talking about removing Daniel Bryan Statement, this wasn't added by me, at the time of the article creation, this was already added at the beginning. there are other wikipedians of Wikiproject Professional Wrestling. I already told you that I give it Top priority as well as I made it my browser homepage so I can look through it and stop IP wars here.CK (talk) 17:55, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- I understand that those lines might not have been added by you. I just mentioned that these particular lines are unsourced before being removed. That's being civil
I made it my browser homepage so I can look through it and stop IP wars here
- Didn't you have this article in your watchlist? You don't have to reload your homepage everytime. -Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:15, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
@Fylindfotberserk: Yes I've watchlisted it too, I also stated that When I visit wikipedia by myself I open that article first then I start visiting other pages or start my work as I visit that article several times. I also watched Cruiserweight Classic, It made me feel that the same war thing of Pakistan India that happens all around especially on social media websites, is gonna happen here too, at encyclopedia website. See, replacing a word Pakistan or Pakistani Descent with Indian references makes it what? nothing? but a boundary war. I know that 'Daniel Bryan thing' is unsourced, but after leaving a note, I also mentioned to you that YOUR CHANGES ARE STILL AS IT IS after you left me a Second message template. Yes, That note I added, I saw that thing for the very first time added in front of me at The Undertaker, then I decided to do same thing with other articles as well as I recommended to few of my fellow editors. I'm not a member of any wikiproject but I do editing of any article of any wikiproject if I see anything wrong there. If I see that thing continuously happen there, then I take a visit to that user's talk page who support my edits as well as that article talk page. Following last removals.
Now I would like to recommend to you to not to remove the statement He is the first WWE wrestler of Pakistani descent
as same as 'Tian Bing is the first WWE Wrestler of Mainland China', 'Kavita Devi is the first female wrestler of WWE from Indian Nationality' and 'Shadia Bseiso became the first Arab female wrestler from the Middle East to sign a contract with WWE'. That's what I wanted. CK (talk) 18:37, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- I already told you that his "Pakistani descent" is sourced from a reliable site, so there's no reason to remove it. But if somebody edits it as "Pakistani" instead of "Pakistani descent" then it would be wrong since he is not a Pakistani national but an American of Pakistani descent. So care need to be taken. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:58, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Fylindfotberserk: Finally! Resolved! Thanks. CK (talk) 20:57, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Thanks man. Follow the Wikipedia guidelines and tell me whenever you need help. Happy editing.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:59, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you!
Welcome. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:46, 22 April 2018 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Greatest Royal Rumble (May 20)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Greatest Royal Rumble and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Broken nutshell!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:16, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
|
@Curb Safe Charmer: As I was trying to use sandbox for the very first time as how it works, bimistakenly it happened. I was making an edit on Article's Controversy Section about Sami Zayn as not a part of Greatest Royal Rumble. Now the line was added already as I visited the article to see if not added. so I was trying to see who Sandbox works on that process. CK (talk) 21:35, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
May 2018
Your thread has been archived
Hi Broken nutshell! You created a thread called archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread .
Delivered by Muninnbot, an
|
re
Hi. Thanks, I hope this issue is done. I mean, for me it's pretty clear, the cruiserweight division is a sub-brand, they are members of RAW. I see this user had some issues with the 3 reversion rule. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 13:45, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
sock edit?
What do you mean by "sock edit"?
I made a simple edit under the name I've been using for a decade - there's no "socking" here...don't understand what you're going for here.
Vjmlhds (talk) 14:58, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
@Vjmlhds: Please Back off and Step back from that article I've already appealed for protection All time accusing website for being glitch and using same arguements and bullshit whatever I.e why I added a template there. CK (talk) 15:03, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Not answering my question about why you referred to my edit as a sock edit...seems by your record that YOU have been blocked recently for socking, and your accusations against me looks like a case of "pot calling the kettle black"...you sir need to ease up and step back. Vjmlhds (talk) 15:07, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
June 2018
This is your final warning. Either abide by the
Speedy deletion nomination of Amir Jordan
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
A tag has been placed on Amir Jordan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 00:58, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Amir Jordan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amir Jordan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Jordan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 10:57, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Using an alternative account to "stop" another user is not a valid use. You have not declared the connection between the two accounts. JTP (talk • contribs) 17:20, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text ]{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 18:21, 14 August 2018 (UTC) |
Unblock
Broken nutshell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
First of all, I accepted it and before getting blocked I already realized my mistake(that I did wrong thing) after receiving messages and got detected by reporting user, However, it's not fair because the IP editor is gonna initiate same arguments, I told that I have no option left after the IP bypassed all of them i.e why i did that. so atleast I need an expiry duration not little bit longer. CK (talk) 19:35, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
non sequitor. you appeal makes no rationale sense.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:50, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Dlohcierekim: This user uses very broken English so it can be hard to understand. Not saying it would change your decline, but just so you are aware, I think they are basically saying they felt they had no other option after Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Editor_continually_editing_against_consensus has resulted in no action from an admin. - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 20:51, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Dlohcierekim: See what Gala said
This user uses very broken English
which is right. as I still cite Galatz since this incident happened. CK (talk) 21:07, 14 August 2018 (UTC)- The issue at hand is WP:NOTTHEM. The blocking admin is Bbb23 and this a WP:CU block. I would require their input before even dreaming of unblocking.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:45, 14 August 2018 (UTC)]
- @Dlohcierekim: I will not consent to an unblock. Although the user is incoherent, at best he exercised very poor judgment by creating another account because he "had to", but this is not the first time he's done it. Last time I blocked him for two weeks, and even then I felt that was lenient. I also get a strong odor of passive-aggressive: I'm sorry I did it but really only because I got caught and I still think I had to do it given the circumstances. This doesn't bode well for the future of this user on Wikipedia.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:50, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Meh. I don't see the poor command of English as any sort of inducement, and I think you are right in your assessment above. Thanks.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)]
- @Dlohcierekim: @Bbb23: I agree. They clearly showed poor judgement, and they've twice accused other users of being a sock, so they obviously understood the rules. I simply was "translating" so you understood the request - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 02:52, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Galatz: @Bbb23: & @Dlohcierekim: yes this discussion is about WP:SOCK, look I don't mean to disrupt wikipedia, this discuss is also about trouble happening at List of WWE personnel. I even appealed the protection and the article was protected for 3 days. Despite protection, this article is still being targeted by rumorers, vandals and attackers by addition of week-by-week synopsis of storyline events, repeated trivias, unconfirmed information, rumors, and other content which is inappropriate to an encyclopedic article. Yes I have no option left to stop the IP editor for his action that he is performing, I recently saw the IP editor putting new text between old messages rather than putting under, and not even signing his messages since joining. The same editor trying to add same repeated trivias, rumors and unconfirmed news even at talk pages which has to be stopped and strict action against that editor has to be taken immediately. That's what I really wanted. CK (talk) 04:08, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- @
- @Dlohcierekim: I will not consent to an unblock. Although the user is incoherent, at best he exercised very poor judgment by creating another account because he "had to", but this is not the first time he's done it. Last time I blocked him for two weeks, and even then I felt that was lenient. I also get a strong odor of passive-aggressive: I'm sorry I did it but really only because I got caught and I still think I had to do it given the circumstances. This doesn't bode well for the future of this user on Wikipedia.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:50, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- The issue at hand is
Broken nutshell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Now I realize my mistake that I did 3 days ago. Next time I'll be familiar with Wikipedia policies and guidelines and never do the same mistake again. CK (talk) 21:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
What mistake was that? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 03:49, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Jpgordon: I did abuse of multiple accounts. CK (talk) 09:16, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Just an FYI, since you knew about the rules of SOCK accounts its doubtful you will get unblocked, at least not now. If you keep opening these requests they typically just block you from being able to edit your own talk page too. You are better off taking a couple months off (they usually recommend 6), cooling off from the whole thing, and then request an unblock with the promise of having learned your lesson and the promise of not repeating. - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 13:27, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Done @Galatz: I Get it, Thanks. CK (talk) 14:10, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Greatest Royal Rumble
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created,
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
]Dear Wikipedians and @Legacypac:, I have a message regarding Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Greatest Royal Rumble, First of all I can't cast any nominations right because I'm blocked from editing right now, talking about this nomination, well, block is not the reason for no participation, Here is the reason of non-participation: It's just a try to edit a current existing article via sandbox experiment which mistakenly led to the creation of new article, so I also appeal the force speedy deletion of Draft:Greatest Royal Rumble if the article still not deleted. Thank You. C K168 13:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- The Draft was blank (no content) and I am just cleaning up hundreds of blank drafts. Legacypac (talk) 16:49, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Legacypac: Get it, Thanks for assistance. Now I continue my rest until I get unblock and clear up all previous things that happened to me and what I've done. So I say thanks again for your assistance. Cheers!. C K168 19:11, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Unblock Request
Broken nutshell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Now I understand the rules of WP:SOCK, I realized what I did 2 months ago, I'll be familiar with Wikipedia policies and guidelines and I will never do any abuse of multiple accounts and repeat any other past mistakes(that I did) ever again. C K168 14:41, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You clearly understood the rule before this round of sockpuppetry, having been blocked for it back in late 2017. This isn't a case of a misunderstanding, so please stop trying to claim that you didn't understand the rules before. Your best bet is to wait six months with zero edits, then apply under
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock Request
Broken nutshell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I Promise to avoid with the behavior of Sockpuppetry that led to blocking, I'll never ever repeat the mistake of WP:SOCK ever again that I have done(2 times I did) and will not cause further damages or disruptions to wikipedia again. Thanks. C K168 22:57, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You've been evading your block. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:17, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@NinjaRobotPirate: First I wanna know, Can evasion easily be detected by IP? either, an edit has been done(not necessarily by blocked user) within the same IP after expiration of IP Block? (that had been blocked for a short time along with the user who was recently blocked).
Secondly, If I'm detected evading block (IF ME), Then, is there any script per
Third, can
Unblock Request
Broken nutshell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I promise to not to repeat the behavior of Sockpuppetry ever again, even I promise that I will never ever repeat any mistake that can disrupt or damage the community ever again. Thanks. C K168 16:20, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No reply to RaviC in over a week. Please feel free to make another request when you have the time to engage with us. SQLQuery me! 03:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- While this account was last blocked for sockpuppetry, there were clearly more problems in their editing. I don't see any reason to accept the unblock unless a topic ban has been made for anything related to Pakistan, but then I don't think that this editor would be interested in editing anything else. --RaviC (talk) 09:17, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Unblock
Broken nutshell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I really promise to not to perform sock-puppetry again even any other activity that could disrupt Wikipedia, (I've waited for 6 months with zero edits and no evasions when I posted last unblock Request), I'm really interested in editing Wikipedia and it's up to me whenever I show up my participation when unblocked. 1) After Unblock, First, I wanna award my friendly and fellow editors their respective barnstars and awards for assisting me in editing articles(majority related to Pakistan, WWE and many other articles that I feel under attacked abruptly, which resulted in having no option left to defend the community). 2) Yup I created 3 Alternate accounts but last 2 accounts were created to defend the community (for one day and leave them to only use your original account, in short, this was just one time only and I don't need any alternate accounts and I'm completely sick of this activity, I'm done with that, and Finally, Sole Accounts are way better for me). 3) Sockpuppetry, Wikipedia is not the only platform, Before being a wikipedia, I did on Facebook and Instagram and the reason "defense" was same as I did here (and I always do this to protect my sole account while having risks of attacks and vulnerabilities, even I've faced attacks too, excepting Wikipedia due to strict policies and guidelines), While Wikipedian have to be very careful while creating alternate accounts as well as there are some policy and guidelines, and I understand what is WP:SOCK, I Again repeat I'll never ever create any multiple account(even perform sockpuppetry) ever again. Thanks again in advance, feel free then respond, no hurrys and worries here. C K168 20:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 09:51, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I'll note you did not agree to the suggested topic ban and you did not suggest what other subject areas you'd edit. We aren't interested in you handing out barnstars and awards. --Yamla (talk) 09:51, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
@
- ]
- @Yamla:, WP:NPA states as well,
during heated and stressful debates editors tend to overreact.
at section Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks#First_offenses_and_isolated_incidents. this is what exactly happened before: Let me show you:
See those above threads, which relates the green quote above as well as turned wikipedia into WP:BATTLEGROUND. C K168 12:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Even Vjmlhds had 11 Blocks in his history with 2 being indefinite for harassments and disruptions. as being referenced in above WP:ANI Links. C K168 12:50, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:171.79.84.35
A tag has been placed on User:171.79.84.35, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:48, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:2600:1:92C2:3151:AABB:97B8:B5C:EAC4
A tag has been placed on
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:50, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Unblock July 2022
Broken nutshell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here I promise to not to repeat the behavior of Sockpuppetry ever again, even I promise that I will never ever repeat any mistake that can disrupt or damage the community ever again. C K168 11:37 am, 15 July 2022, Friday (28 days ago) (UTC−4).
Accept reason:
hell|168]] 15:37, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Checkuser data shows no evidence of block evasion, though they likely have control over Saadahmedkhan. That account, however, has never edited. --Yamla (talk) 16:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Broken nutshell, you still have not agreed to the above topic ban. You are very unlikely to be unblocked without doing so. --Yamla (talk) 16:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Okay I agree with topic ban :@Yamla:. C K168 17:14, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Yamla: OK to accept? Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:52, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- No objections to me, given the topic ban on Pakistan, broadly construed. --Yamla (talk) 00:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Never asked the blocking admin, @Bbb23:, if OK to unblock. Yamla cleared CU part. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:52, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra: Thanks for the ping. If you and Yamla think we should unblock the user, go ahead.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:31, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Never asked the blocking admin, @Bbb23:, if OK to unblock. Yamla cleared CU part. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:52, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- No objections to me, given the topic ban on Pakistan, broadly construed. --Yamla (talk) 00:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Yamla: OK to accept? Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:52, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- Okay I agree with topic ban :@Yamla:. C K168 17:14, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Resilient Barnstar | |
Where have you been? Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:40, 16 September 2023 (UTC) |
- @Fylindfotberserk Yo! I Actually got blocked for suckpuppetry again but this time was indefinite and topic ban imposed on be on the topics related to Pakistan in order to get unblock and no idea for how long. Aside of this I had other things to do as the time when i used to do wikipedia I was a university student that time, now concentrating on heavy and tough job opportunities nowadays so i have been less focusing on wikipedia articles. don't worry Broken nutshell still alive for contributions. also i'm nowadays not been concentrating on pro wrestling and wwe since last covid pandemic times. lot more stories surrounding me but can't explain more cuz may go longer. C K168 10:57, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- Best of luck for your endeavours. I was busy too.. with work, then got COVID, and recently my dad passed away :(. Life goes on... - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:53, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review