User talk:Brookster22

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from

I know that you are a new editor, with only four edits to your name, but while it is true that sometimes blogs are not RSs, that is not a hard and fast rule, as you stated here. I'm also not certain of your rationale for deleting the SEC document. Finally, if you could put my mind at ease -- have you ever edited under another name?--Epeefleche (talk) 05:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Talk:George Demos. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Epeefleche (talk) 06:07, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:12, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:George Demos, you may be blocked from editing. Epeefleche (talk) 11:39, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at George Demos, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. At minimum, reputable advocacy organizations such as POGO are certainly RSs. Epeefleche (talk) 20:42, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Epeefleche (talk) 21:02, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Please note this report relating to your edit warring.--Epeefleche (talk) 21:27, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Brookster22,

This is an automated friendly notification to inform you that you have been reported for Violation of the

.
If you feel that this report has been made in error, please reply as soon as possible on the

noticeboard

. However, before contesting an Edit warring report, please review the respective policies to ensure you are not in violation of them. ~ NekoBot (MeowTalk) 21:31, 16 June 2011 (UTC) (False positive? Report it!)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 Hours for Edit Warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:35, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]