User talk:Bruno Rene Vargas/Archives/2021/May

The article Thirst (upcoming film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable future film, fails

WP:NFF

as production isn't notable. Should be deleted or moved to draftspace until released and then notability can be established.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:40, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Exchange (upcoming film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable future film, fails

WP:NFF

as production wasn't notable. Should be deleted or sent to draftspace until release, upon which notability can be determined at that time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 17:30, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you started a draft for

@Cardei012597: there is no problem. And I take this opportunity to thank you for the discussion pages of my drafts that you always take care of creating. Greetings. Bruno Vargas _{Eñe'ẽ avec moi} 04:58, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Jazzman's Blues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Austin Scott.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Candy Land (upcoming film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candy Land (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 19:19, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grey Elephant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grey Elephant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 00:54, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm noticing a lot of articles you are creating/moving to mainspace have only a single article source. The Variety production update website is not necessarily an indication of notability as it seems to be just a database of information. Also, it appears that you are pulling cast and character names from IMDb, which is not okay. Please do not add content without proper sourcing. BOVINEBOY2008 00:57, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I strike part of my concern, I see now that you are probably pulling from the Variety page as well. BOVINEBOY2008 01:00, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

Variety Insight links, but keep in mind that it is not just a database like IMDb because shoot start and end dates are specified and sometimes they have a brief introduction explaining the books or novels on which they are based, in addition to the fact that unlike IMDb or Wikipedia it cannot be edited by any Internet user. Regarding your accusation that I use names extracted from IMDb is totally false, since you told me two months ago that names and characters extracted from IMDb should not be used, I no longer do it, I get them from Variety Insight that how already I told you it cannot be modified by anyone, only by paid people who work in that company. Bruno Vargas _{Eñe'ẽ avec moi} 01:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

My concern is that being listed there is not an indication of Notability. You are creating many articles that (in my view) do not have significant coverage as indicated by

WP:GNG. Yes, the film title is mentioned by two websites, but I don't believe Variety Insight's listing should count towards that. A lot of times, I can find other sources out there which you should try to include, but sometimes not. Can you please try to keep articles in draft space not just until the date the filming is supposed to have begun has past, but once the topic has significant coverage. BOVINEBOY2008 01:14, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

@Bovineboy2008: you're right, I have no problem following your recommendation as I have previously done. I will wait for the films in question to have more coverage and notability before moving them. Greetings Bruno Vargas _{Eñe'ẽ avec moi} 01:18, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! If you need help finding sources, I can help. Just drop a line. BOVINEBOY2008 01:20, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article State of Consciousness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/State of Consciousness until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 16:28, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Borrego (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borrego (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 16:28, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Archive 81 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archive 81 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 16:28, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hitpig is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitpig until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 16:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Afterlife of the Party has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:NFF

, nothing found to pass GNG. Per NFF, "... films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolma8 (talk) 16:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

OSS 117: Alerte Rouge en Afrique Noire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OSS 117: Alerte Rouge en Afrique Noire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 16:31, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article She Is Love (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:NFF

, nothing found to pass GNG. Per NFF, "... films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolma8 (talk) 16:32, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Those Who Walk Away (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:NFF

, nothing found to pass GNG. Last updates about the movie is from last year. Per NFF, "... films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolma8 (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bruno Rene Vargas, please take a second to read through

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Two (upcoming film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 16:42, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Inexorable (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:NFF

, nothing found to pass GNG. Per NFF, "... films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolma8 (talk) 16:42, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Obsidian (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obsidian (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 16:43, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alegría (upcoming film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alegría (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 16:45, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vesper Seeds is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vesper Seeds until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 16:46, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Presences has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:NFF

, nothing found to pass GNG. Per NFF, "... films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolma8 (talk) 16:47, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 8-Bit Christmas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8-Bit Christmas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 16:47, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spencer (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Douglas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Afterlife of the Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afterlife of the Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 06:56, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hatching (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatching (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spencer (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spencer (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 07:07, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Make sure to assume

Films can be fairly difficult to write about on Wikipedia, to be honest. Proving that a production is notable enough to warrant an article is hard, as this often requires a lot of coverage that not only covers an extended period of time but also goes into some depth. This coverage must also be in multiple outlets and in places Wikipedia would see as reliable. The vast majority of films won't have this coverage, particularly anything that would be considered "niche" such indies, horror, and so on. There are only so many outlets that will cover films in general and far, far more films to be covered.

This is one of my favorite areas to edit/create in and as such, I can understand the frustration of the sourcing limitations. I've had multiple occasions where I've wanted to create an article on something, only to find that there's just not enough coverage - or had someone tell me that there weren't enough sources for an article on which I was working. It is never meant to be personal, just that the article needed more sourcing. It's why I tend to leave articles in my userspace until the coverage is heavy enough. For the majority this will mean that they only have an article after it's released and has received reviews.

As far as someone following your edits, don't assume that it's a case of retribution. It may be that they noticed an article of yours that lacked enough sourcing to pass NFF/NFILM and looked at your other articles, then noticed similar articles. That doesn't mean that they're hounding you per se. I personally think that it's better to reach out to the article creator to let them know what needs to be fixed before nominating, but that's not an absolute rule. If in question, it's best to reach out to the editor on their talk page to discuss the deletion. Don't assume that this is an attack or retribution against you. This can sometimes have a bit of a backlash and can also put people on guard when coming into articles. Now if you do have evidence that the person is hounding you and that they're not responding to civil discussions, you should bring this up to

My point is basically that Wikipedia is a learning process that can in turn be fun, tedious, or outright unpleasant depending on the situation. All I can recommend in the times where it's very frustrating and seems unpleasant is to try to keep a cool head and learn what you can from the situation. It may be necessary to back away and work in different areas, taking some time to lick your wounds and get more familiar with the entire process. Something I can recommend personally is improving existing articles and if you are fluent in another language (or fluent in Google Translate), work on translating articles to or from other language Wikipedias. If you want, I also have a list of films that need articles but haven't gotten around to making. I tend to gravitate more towards horror films, but this seems like it's an area of interest to you as well. Basically, if it's in that list and has sourcing under it, it's a notable film. Not all of them are American films either - many are from other countries and/or are fairly indie. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 20:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films with screenplays selected in The Black List has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 02:21, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Television series with screenplays selected in The Black List has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Le Deluge (talk) 15:37, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:39, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]