User talk:Bunchofgrapes

This user is lost behind the couch cushions. The poor schlub has not edited Wikipedia since time immemorial. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Am I the dead guy or one of the dogs? Back, I'd just be a troublemaker. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 21:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• You can't be one of those dogs. They have legs. Bishonen | talk 23:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC).[reply]
• My guess? The light of the dawn. - BanyanTree 09:25, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  ooh, you're good. KillerChihuahua^?!? 22:05, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

Welcome back all my friend to the show that never ends! We’re so glad you could attend - come inside, come inside. KillerChihuahua^?!? 23:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, man. Was just thinking about you. How're you holding up? DS (talk) 01:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

EddieSegoura Ban Appeal

For your information, a discussion has been opened at

a/c) 01:20, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Everyking's RFA

Hi Bunch, it was great to see you edit today, especially as It was a

talk) 18:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Pardon?

Responding to your message on my

^[talk] 23:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Request for help

I am will shortly be posting to

WP:AN

with the request below. Any support would be appreciated.

Request to WP:AN

"I would like to take the article History of logic to FA. I have already sought input from a number of contributors and have cleared up the issues raised (I am sure there are more). I wrote nearly all of the article using different accounts, as follows:

• User:Peter Damian (old)
• User:HistorianofLogic
• User:Logicist
• User:Here today, gone tomorrow
• User:Renamed user 4

I would like to continue this work but I am frustrated by the zealous activity of

User:Fram

who keeps making significant reverts, and blocking accounts wherever he suspects the work of a 'banned user'. (Fram claims s/he doesn't understand "the people who feel that content is more important than anything else").

Can I please be left in peace with the present account to complete this work. 'History of logic' is a flagship article for Wikipedia, and is an argument against those enemies who claim that nothing serious can ever be accomplished by the project".

talk) 09:58, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

FAR notice

I have nominated

featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- Cirt (talk) 02:37, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

File:Bishzilla spin.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered,

Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:13, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Eventualists rule!

Take a look :)

Djembayz (talk) 04:42, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the

I'm gonna go ahead and game the system with this reply, then. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 17:26, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, good job. Funny man. MBisanz ^talk 14:31, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

…from the evil twin and her baby hooligan gang. darwinbish ^BITE ☠ 15:13, 25 December 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Kawai! —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 22:19, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bunchofgrapes! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:15, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bunchie, there's a new ban appeal by Eddie Segoura here on AN which looks to be going well. I'll wait for your opinion, if you have one, before I jump one way or the other. I was quite impressed by the stubborn disruptiveness of Eddie in the distant past, but they say people can change. Anyway, nobody knows more about it than you. Bishonen | talk 09:49, 18 May 2015 (UTC).[reply]

I guess my comments from the 2009 appeal (which I did not actually oppose) still stand. I'm willing to believe there's a decent chance he won't be malicious, and if the community wants to put up with what a pain-in-the-ass he can be is even when he's being good, there's little reason not to give him another shot. A quick look at his edits as WikiBaseballFan actually have me wondering if he hasn't grown up some in the last six years, even. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 15:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So you don't you want to say that on AN, little Bunch? Bishonen | talk 16:30, 18 May 2015 (UTC).[reply]

OK, OK :-) —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 16:47, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[Bishzilla hands the good little user some gingerbread.] Little Bunch welcome in pocket even though not editing! Feel free take up invisible residence! Discreet ingress and egress through catflap. bishzilla _ROARR!! 18:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

The file File:Mona bisha.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. XXN, 22:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Drury lane theatre map.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 19:24, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You uploaded or restored , File:Tulipface spin.gif, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work, please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add |claimed=yes and an |author=to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not entirely your own work, then please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

It's okay to remove or strike this message once the issue has been resolved :).

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:54, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BOG, I just thought I’d drop by to wish you a prosperous New Year and say it would be nice to see a little more of you around the place. Giano (talk) 21:36, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks, Giano. Is everything all fixed around here, then, or are you all still slaving away for the glory of our "betters"? —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 03:54, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, everything’s fixed. The place is a positive Utopia, never been better - Jimbo asks me in for a weekly beer to sound out my views for advice. Glad to see you are still looking in. Have a great 2020. Giano (talk) 00:24, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated