User talk:Busition

Doug Weller talk 15:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok Busition (talk) 02:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have you any reason to think this site still exists? It doesn't for me. Doug Weller talk 16:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sorry if I bothered your time, I just randomly found the article and thought it needed a few edits. That was all. I don't know any information about the website itself if you needed to know. All I just know is from the article itself, nothing else really. On second thought, I think you were talking about this specific website, but I don't really know much about that either as far as I can tell. But other than that, thank you for your time and for going on my talk page, I appreciate it 👍. Busition (talk) 03:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I asked because the website is dead and hoped you might know something. I might if I have time change the tense. Doug Weller talk 06:47, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

oh ok then Busition (talk) 14:19, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is sourced almost exclusively to the company website, and what isn't seems to be announcements of routine business transactions, these things does not establish notability. An article about this company must summarize what independent

a notable company

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Coffee Cup (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Coffee Cup (company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be tagged for G13 deletion.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 12:50, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Busition. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:53, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:50, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of companies of Bolivia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 23:14, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

An article you recently created,

Hello, Busition. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:31, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Busition. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:14, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Ferromax Group. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and existing sources are press releases and/or are not reliable. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. WhoAteMyButter (🌴_talk│☀️^contribs) 08:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Delta Air Lines Flight 194 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Event fails Wikipedia notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RecycledPixels (talk) 07:53, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Delta Air Lines diarrhea incident has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Aircraft accidents and incidents guidelines. It is neither an aviation accident or incident.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the

]

Nomination of Delta Air Lines diarrhea incident for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Delta Air Lines diarrhea incident is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Air Lines diarrhea incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WWGB (talk) 01:41, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

WP:PROD tag [1] after doing so? I'd suggest self-reverting the addition of the prod and move the page back into mainspace. If you want to suggestion drafication, you can do so in the AFD. Thanks! Skynxnex (talk) 18:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for doing so and I hope this process doesn't sour you on Wikipedia too much! I can tell it was created in good faith and is a pretty decent article, even though it looks like it may be deleted for notability reasons. Happy editing. Skynxnex (talk) 19:33, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Busition. Thank you for your work on

page curation process

, had the following comments:

Nice article. Surprised there wasn't one before.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Skynxnex}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Skynxnex (talk) 19:56, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message