If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon }}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria
I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy for the following reason: It is promotional in nature.. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?
I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.
.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon }}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me ) 13:29, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Kemet Journal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Magazine of unclear status. Link to "Kemet" provided seems to be to something else than what is described in this article. Unable to find good sources or even a homepage for this magazine. Apparently non-notable.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ ]
The article Coptologia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable journal. Does not meet WP:NJournals
.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk ) 15:40, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Center for Intercultural Dialogue and Translation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not appear to satisfy
WP:ORG
. Not sure if this is a non-profit organisation
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
Iaintbrdpit (
talk ) 13:11, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Iaintbrdpit (
talk ) 15:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Sawsan Gabra Ayoub Khalil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sawsan Gabra Ayoub Khalil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Iaintbrdpit (
talk ) 07:24, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Religious News Service from the Arab World is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religious News Service from the Arab World until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Iaintbrdpit (
talk ) 07:28, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Arab-West Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arab-West Foundation (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Iaintbrdpit (
talk ) 07:29, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
[ reply ]