User talk:Randykitty

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Hi, and welcome to my User Talk page! For new discussions, please add your comments at the very bottom and use a section heading (e.g., by using the "+" tab, or, depending on your settings, the "new section" tab at the top of this page). I will respond on this page unless specifically requested otherwise. I dislike talk-back templates and fragmented discussions. If I post on your page you may assume that I will watch it for a response. If you post here I will assume the same (and that you lost interest if you stop following the discussion).

Hi Randykitty. Can you please explain your closing rationale at Nadia Naji as 'no consenus'. I believe my argument was more policy based than those of the other two editors who voted to keep. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 16:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I just had another look and stay at "no consensus": there were policy-based arguments for and against deletion. If you feel that my close does not reflect the discussion, feel free to take it to
  WP:DRV. --Randykitty (talk) 16:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Nadia Naji. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:09, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]