User talk:CFCF/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Post August 2015

Agnes Martin and the google doodle

If you want to war over that google doodle being mentioned in the article on Agnes Martin, perhaps you should take it to the Talk page. I read the brief discussion you linked, which seems to include the opinions of a few and no tallies of articles about men and women compared to google doodle about noting men and women. Wikipedia marks some articles by putting them in Did you know..? on the Wikipedia main page. Do you routinely delete that from the article's talk page? Google honors people, not articles, by new artwork to honor the person. I sometimes know the person, but like so very many people, I go to the Wikipedia article to learn about someone new to me. The articles are usually edit-locked for the time the doodle is up, to discourage the many people who thoughtlessly edit the articles. Do you think it is an insult to the person's memory to be remembered? Is that the case? The arguments at your link were somewhat convoluted, that you will delete mention of a google doodle, and a link to it, for articles about women because if there is a google doodle about a man, it is not mentioned in the article about the man. If that is true (and you provide no evidence), why not add mention of the doodles about men, as your grand Wikipedia project instead? At any rate, the text has been knocked out and added back in twice now, so it is time to make a stronger case at Agnes Martin as to why that real event about her in popular culture must be censored from the article. --Prairieplant (talk) 11:00, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

WikiProject Anatomy Newsletter #4

WikiProject Anatomy
Newsletter #4

Previous
Released: 1 July, 2015
Editor:
Tom (LT)

Hello

mailing list

What's new
What's going on
The vermiform appendix, seen in the bottom left and the cause of much anguish when inflammed, stirs up an interesting discussion.
  • Should Vermiform appendix be retitled to its more common name (Appendix)? The discussion continues!
  • A large number of "back end" changes are made, and integration with Wikidata continues -- see the focus for more.
  • Our set of
    cranial nerve
    -related articles receive a review by a subject expert
How can I contribute?
Our articles on the 13 12 cranial nerves receive a review from a subject expert
  • If you're interested in a topic area,
    let other editors know by creating a 'drive' in that area
  • Continue to reword articles in language lay readers can understand
  • Search
    Wikimedia commons
    for high-quality coloured images that can be used to replace some of our older, lower quality images.
  • Don't forget that anatomy isn't always about gross anatomy! A number of other fields, including articles about embryology and histology ("microanatomy") cry out for attention.
Issue focus - technical changes

This issue was originally going to focus on how far we've come as a project. However, that encouraging news can wait until next issue, as there are simply too many changes going on at the "back end" of our project not to write about. What do I mean by "back end"? I mean changes that are not necessarily visible to readers, but may have a significant impact on the way we edit or on future edits.

Templates

A number of visible changes have been made to our templates. Firstly, the way our templates have been linked together has changed. Previously, this was a small bar with single-letter links. This has been replaced by a light-coloured box contained within all our templates with fully-worded links, which provides links to relevant anatomy and medical templates. This should make life a lot easier, particularly for students and other readers who are struggling with the vastness of anatomical systems and their related diseases and treatments.

As part of this, almost all our templates have been reviewed and cleaned up. The previously confusing colour scheme has been removed and colour standardised. The titles have been simplified. References to "identifiers" in the titles of navigation boxes (such as

cleanup continues
, please feel free to contribute or propose templates which need attention.

Anatomy infobox

Most of our articles have an infobox. Previously, there were 11 separate infoboxes for different fields, such as muscles, nerves and embryology. These have been united so that at the "back end", every template will take formatting directly from the main anatomy infobox -- however at the "front end", there is little difference for readers. This will make future changes much easier -- including adding new fields, formatting, and reordering the contents. Several changes have already been made: infoboxes now link to a relevant anatomical terminology article; contents are now divided into 'Identifiers' and 'Details' headings, making it easier to grasp content for new readers; and new fields have been added, including Greek and UBERON, with several more under discussion.

External links

An editor has reviewed all our template-based external links. These are the links that often fill the "External links" category, and sometimes used as citations. At least thirty different links sets, with the number of links stretching into the thousands, have been fixed, and if not functioning, deleted. A number of non-functioning dead links (with no archived websites available), and one or two others, have been deleted. This helps keep our 'external links' section relevant and functioning for those readers who want extra information about articles.

Wikidata

Perhaps our most important change has been integration with

data visualisation
are really quite encouraging!

Our next issue will focus on how far WikiProject Anatomy has come in the past 2 years.

This has been

mailing list

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania meetup notes

Hi, have you posted your notes from the meetup anywhere? Could not find them via that page. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 01:08, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CFCF 🍌 (email) 06:10, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiProject Women

Hi, I see you recently joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red. I've made a proposal to merge this project into Wikipedia:WikiProject Women at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red, so we can not only cover missing articles but focus on general quality of women's biographies. If interested please put your name down on the WP:Women page at the bottom.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:03, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TAFI's
List of articles

  • Hello CFCF:
A
List of articles
 page. Your input is welcome at the discussion.
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 04:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

* Read this Signpost in full* Single-page* Unsubscribe* MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This week's
article for improvement
(week 32, 2015)

A farmhouse (bottom) in Einsiedeln, Switzerland
Hello, CFCF.

The following are WikiProject

Today's articles for improvement
's weekly selections:

Previous selections: Igloo • Dessert • Kayaking

Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
  • Nominate an article
  • Review nominations
  • Have your say in future selections
Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:18, 3 August 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

August 2015

ArbCom case "Editor conduct in e-cigs articles" has now been opened

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles/Evidence. Please add your evidence by August 18, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:12, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

Investigation

I saw a notice that my username is added to an investigation. I have absolutelly no relation to any of those editors, I am from Venezuela and edit mostly pages of Venezuelan people. --Eleonora Venezuela (talk) 20:00, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring

Stop edit warring...Modernist (talk) 23:08, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Non-free rationale for File:08klemperer.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale
.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

Stefan2 (talk) 20:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Acupuncture

Please watch

WP:3RR. --NeilN talk to me 21:23, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Acupuncture DS alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised

Complementary and Alternative Medicine, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here
.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means
uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks
. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

~

talk) 23:08, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

I realize you're probably already familiar with discretionary sanctions from your time over at
talk) 23:10, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:08klemperer.jpg

Thank you for uploading

image copyright tag
; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our

Stefan2 (talk) 22:00, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

3RR

It would be gracious of you to revert your fourth RR at

WP:BURDEN is on you to justify the change, so if you could please leave the status quo in the main article, it is the appropriate behavior. Montanabw(talk) 20:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Please see over the history, you are mistaken.
CFCF 💌 📧 20:56, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CFCF/Archive_7&oldid=1144109656"