Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Antonio López de Santa Anna, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you.
Keith D (talk) 15:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{talk) 23:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
{{talk) 23:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Casey Max Jacobson and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Closeapple (talk) 15:37, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
{{hangon}}
poopCaseyj354 (talk) 00:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 00:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Christina Bauer. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 00:15, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
Caseyj354 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i am very sorry, please unban me. I have much to contribute to many sections. I love wikipedia and am thoroughly sorry. Thanks for reading. :)
Decline reason:
Absolutely not, if this is how you normally talk to people. —Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 23:18, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
i dont know this guy, but he seems legit.
Not a reason for being unblocked, and your edits only confirm that. Rodhullandemu 02:55, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]