User talk:Ccxtv94

Hello, Ccxtv94, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your

• Policy on neutral point of view
• Guideline on spam
• Guideline on external links
• Guideline on conflict of interest
• FAQ for Organizations

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and how to develop articles
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Article wizard for creating new articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please

Hello. My name is Eggishorn and I notice you've been editing this article to change the url. There are claims on the talk page of this article that the version of the url you are adding, the one containing a dash, are links to malware sites. Please do not change the url back without stating why on the talk page. Please especially explain why you dispute the allegations of malware. Thank you. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:10, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Putlocker shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:12, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ccxtv94 reported by User:Eggishorn (Result: ). Thank you. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:34, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As you have continued to revert without discussion, I have updated the discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ccxtv94 reported by User:Eggishorn (Result: ). Thank you. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:06, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. It has been claimed that the link you are restoring is infected with malware. You really can't keep restoring the link without joining the discussion on the talk page. We need to resolve that problem one way or the other if the link is going to be kept in the article. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 22:48, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When this block expired, you went back to restoring the link. The next logical step is to indefinitely block your account. Is this link so important to you? Are you incapable of explaining your rationale? EdJohnston (talk) 16:52, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've been blocked for a month for edit warring at

WP:GAB for how to appeal. EdJohnston (talk) 19:49, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]