User talk:ChaplainLoo

Hello, ChaplainLoo, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 01:33, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen, "AnglicanChaplains", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or have the appearance of shared use. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you.--Shirt58 (talk) 01:37, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks... not knowing much being new to Wiki, I'm watching YouTubes and Wiki tutorials... it's worn me out! My username was general and related to my position with the Anglican Chaplains, whom Bishop Jones leads. I think I've fixed most of what you suggested and I see that a couple of other people have added new information and citations. Thanks for what you do and sorry I sent you an e-mail... I just now figured out how to talk to you on this page... V/R Lauren --

Hello, ChaplainLoo. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 03:29, 30 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a

policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.  You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. If you prefer to be unblocked for the purpose of changing your username to a username which complies with our username policy, so that your contributions with this username are recorded as contributions of your new username and rather than creating a new account, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice instead. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 15:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ChaplainLoo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

new username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

A simple message would have been nicer than just blocking someone new, don't you think? Hopefully, you a bureaucrat with permissions to change a name... If so, then you can add "Administrator" to yield the name "AnglicanChaplainsAdministrator." If not, then please unblock me so I can make the request. V/R LaurenAnglicanChaplains (talk) 10:42 pm, Yesterday (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

Suggested new username is not suitable (see below); please log a new request with a proposed username that meets

the username policy. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

We do not allow "Administrator" in a username either due to the potential for confusion with Wikipedia's

administrator corps (i.e. implies authority). Please see WP:Username policy and choose a new name that complies with it. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 00:05, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ChaplainLoo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

LaurenRU (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I have read the entire username policy... simply dropping the "s" from AnglicanChaplains would suffice. Also, AnglicanChaplainSecretary or Admin actually is acceptable based on the section in Administration. I also see that BLOCKING me was contrary to the Naming Policy as well. So I request to be unblocked so that I can make a request to change the name to something that infers an individual such as "AnAnglicanChaplain" or "JustOneAnglican"... I might even just use my initials... LRLUAnglicanChaplain... tell me please which you like better. But, please follow the wikipedia policy about blocking new members also found in the UserName policy, unblock me, and let me change my username. Thank you AnglicanChaplains (talk) 17:37, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Accept reason:

As per the conversation below, allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at

BWilkins←✎) 12:36, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

As an outside person here as well, can I say a few things: first, everyone here who has commented/blocked wants you unblocked. There are a couple of glitches with some of your understanding. First, any userid with "administrator" or "admin" will not be permitted as editors would believe that it meant "Wikipedia administrator". Second, if someone has what appears to be a promotional username, you're right - they should not be blocked immediately ... unless their only edits have been to related topics - at that point we do have to block. You are correct, however, that most of the other choices you made (such as AnAnglicanChaplain) would be totally 100% fine to use - so pick one, insert it into the "new username" part of your unblock. Someone will then unblock you and give you directions on how to go get that username changed. It's that easy. Just ensure, however, that you do not edit anything with which you have COI, or insert links to an organization you're involved with, etc -

BWilkins←✎) 18:14, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you BWilkins. I just wish someone would have said - hey, your username is bad - and told me how to fix it. And you say give honest answers? I haven't been dishonest about anything; and I guess I'm too dumb to have figured out that in all this blocking business someone was asking me a question?!?!! Of course I'll answer the questions for Max... Business directory? No... in my self description, I thought I was doing it correctly by talking about Anglican Chaplaincy since most of my articles will involve that area and my expertise to write is in that area... such as my first one on Bishop Jones, and the next one on Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty (the one I'm working on now), Anglican Chaplains, Chaplain resources, etc. I'll change my EditingUser info to a more of an "about me" format. Conflict of interest? Not sure how it is conflict of interest to write about something you know something about, especially since I'm not sourcing anything else I've written in the articles...so, no, how would this be conflict of interest? Considering I have input on many articles, and have only written my first, there's no personal conflict of interest either. Notable? I suppose that reference is to that same first article... it's a person in the news who is absolutely notable - and more of a notable and historical figure than some of his peers who are in wiki! So, really, I mean no offense toward Max or anyone, but that's kind of a silly question. Why would someone write about someone who isn't notable or a public figure? Who would read the article? So, bottom-line, please forgive me for wiki-ignorance - I did the best I could to try to get started. Sorry to have not done it in the right way. And frankly, I'm not sure I have much motivation to try to do this again. But, at least, if someone can change my username or possibly help me do it, I'd appreciate it so I can at least still edit on other articles. I really just want the bludgeoning to be over! ("...bludgeoning..." is meant tongue in cheek) Lauren

talk) 04:13, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Ok, see the instructions above for where to change your username. If you have trouble, I'm still watching right here. I had to laugh at your question (no not at you) "Why would someone write about someone who isn't notable or a public figure?" ... we have delete literally DOZENS of articles on a daily basis about non-notable individuals - sometimes it's pure vanity, sometimes people think this is Facebook, or sometimes people simply don't read/don't understand

BWilkins←✎) 12:39, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Now, click here and scroll to the very very bottom of the edit window, then paste what you copied above. (

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bishop Derek LS Jones, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Thanks! Some updates are needed and I will get the information this week. Bishop Jones has become a diocene bishop, which is a big deal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.85.32.175 (talk) 16:52, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ChaplainLoo. It has been over six months since you last edited your

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bishop Derek LS Jones}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —Anne Delong (talk) 14:13, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been deleted. I'm not wiki savvy and didn't realize when we changed the name of the article that the old draft remained. Please forgive ChaplainLoo (talk) 19:42, 27 January 2014 (UTC)ChaplainLoo[reply]