User talk:CharlieDelta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Royal Clarence Yard has been accepted

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 02:43, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CharlieDelta. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What are appropriate references?

I'm an avid reader, so I frequently contribute to pages about books and/or authors. Many of these have "Problem" tags telling us to add references, and I've had over-zealous editors remove my edits, but no-where does anyone tell us what kind of references we should be providing. For example, what kind of reference proves the existence of a specific book or story written by the author? What kind of reference shows that book A comes before or after book B in a series? Could we please get some real, meaningful, useful guidance on how to resolve these issues? 130.167.171.156 (talk) 14:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]