User talk:Charwinger21

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 11:43, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would just like to point out that the NHL 08 and NHL 11 articles have similar images showing other game enhancements from those years and that it is a common practice in most sports game articles as it is hard to properly describe certain parts of the game (such as a major revamp to the fighting system) without images.

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote,

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MTS 945, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jar Jar Abrams. Since you had some involvement with the Jar Jar Abrams redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 15:12, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Although I appreciate any efforts to improve the articles, it is not clear to me why you removed the scrollable table fields that were recently introduced (before that the table rows were often pages high, which was impractical). I had already opened an item on the MediaTek article's talk page Talk:MediaTek, which should be the ideal place to further discuss the matter. Maybe you can clarify. Thanks. Calamites (talk) 14:30, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Out of Here (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 23:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Out of Here (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 23:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Citobun (talk) 16:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sue Googe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sue Googe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -

Hello, Charwinger21. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Denzel Subban. Since you had some involvement with the Denzel Subban redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 04:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Charwinger21. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect De De. Since you had some involvement with the De De redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:50, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Charwinger21. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Nexus 7 (2012 version has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 11 § Nexus 7 (2012 version until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Nexus 7 (2013 version has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § Nexus 7 (2013 version until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]