User talk:Chetsford

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48

Messages from bots may not be preserved in the archives.

Chetsford is out of town from 25 June 2025 until July 10 2025 and may not respond to queries.

Thank you for approving the page "Smartphone Free Childhood"! I hope that other users will help to expand it Rosario Carlo Rizzo (talk) 07:28, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at

Hi Chetsford! My request for pending changes reviewer has been pending for some time. Are you able to help out with that? My apologies if you are not the right person! Thank you! Dahawk04 (talk) 17:24, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dahawk04 - sorry for the delay, I've processed this now. Chetsford (talk) 18:10, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated! Have a great weekend! Dahawk04 (talk) 18:14, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, Dahawk04. Thanks for your diligence and keep up the great work. Chetsford (talk) 18:46, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chetsford. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{

ygm}} template.

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 18:19, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply

Sophisticatedevening - thanks for bringing this to my attention. I've replied by email. Chetsford (talk) 18:39, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've always found your closures quite well-reasoned, but if you want to run your conclusions by me and obtain my feedback and signature, I'm happy to do that for you. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 00:59, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Compassionate727! Can you review a draft closing statement here and let me know your thoughts and if you agree/disagree? Chetsford (talk) 01:38, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. My methodology was very different. (In short: when I weigh consensus, I normally begin by considering only the strength of the arguments on each side. Then, if there are valid arguments on both sides, I might use vote tallies to "adjust" the strength of each sides' arguments to arrive at an—admittedly somewhat subjective—evaluation of the strength of each side, which I use to assess the consensus.) Also, I seem to have reached very different conclusions from you regarding which arguments were strong and which policies supported which sides. That said, we arrived at the same conclusion. We probably need to discuss the last paragraph of your "summary of the discussion" section in some detail, but because of the different approaches, I'm not sure my thoughts are useful for refining your closing statement beyond that. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 18:31, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Compassionate727 - sorry for my delayed reply, I was offline yesterday. I think your close is great. If you're amenable, why don't you close the discussion and I'll just add an endorsement saying I came to the same conclusion? Chetsford (talk) 14:47, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, uh, that's quite the endorsement. I'm a little ticked, honestly. It may take me a few days to convert that outline to paragraphs, depending on work. How about I then run that by you and we can hammer out any kinks? —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 02:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Kamani

Hi, I've updated the tone and made improvements to theAdam Kamani article. I'm fairly new to editing Wikipedia and was wondering if I allowed to remove the banner myself, or does it need to be reviewed by Teatree? Thanks! Applesandpears20 (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Applesandpears20 - I'm sorry I don't recall ever editing this article. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding your question? Chetsford (talk) 21:07, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On

23 June 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Disclosure movement, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the TV show Ancient Aliens speculated that the CIA caused Hillary Clinton to lose the 2016 U.S. presidential election in order to foil UFO disclosure? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Disclosure movement. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Disclosure movement), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page

.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On

24 June 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Karl Negley Mellon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported that "half of the residents of Mount Desert Island, Maine, are convinced they are millionaires since the body of Karl N. Mellon" was discovered? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Karl Negley Mellon. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Karl Negley Mellon), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page

.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:03, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 8,040 views (670.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2025 – nice work!

]

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

On

29 June 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stavatti Aerospace, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Stavatti Aerospace's only known facilities in 2021 were a "one-person office suite", a "machine shop ... slightly larger than a basketball court", and the CEO's house? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stavatti Aerospace. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Stavatti Aerospace), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page

.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:04, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]