User talk:Chompy Ace/Archives/2020

Do not edit this page. This is the archive of User talk:Chompy Ace for the year 2020. (Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page.) See the annual archives for 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1001:B004:12BB:C45B:2E71:EFB5:30E2 (talk) 21:41, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Carl, thank you for your message. However, it’s unclear as to how my edit was unconsrtuctive, and I was hoping you could explain so I can avoid similar mistakes in the future. 67.142.203.142 (talk) 02:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Per Bluejay14's revert that's clear. There is no evidence of the user "Tim Hardcastle", which is not registered.

Carl Tristan Orense

02:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Could you please explain how this was vandalism?

Yes, that IP range's user has no clue what's going on, is engaging in kinda fringe (or at least POV) original research, and is bordering on edit warring. But I'm not seeing where anyone has explained things to them, and when they tried to ask for a reason, you reverted it and gave them a final warning?

Is there a related account or IP range that I'm missing? Ian.thomson (talk) 02:54, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

I think this post is placed on the top without the section, it is vandalism.

Carl Tristan Orense

02:55, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

See "Incorrect wiki markup and style". Ian.thomson (talk

) 02:59, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you.

Carl Tristan Orense

03:00, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Stop updating the episode count 1 week in advance. You are obviously not from the future to be doing that.TheHotwiki (talk) 23:56, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi

Keep these things in mind regarding the tool or when you're reviewing any pending changes:

• A list of articles with pending edits awaiting review can be viewed at Special:PendingChanges.
• A list of the articles currently under pending changes protection can be viewed at Special:StablePages.
• Being granted and having these rights does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you (obviously).
• You'll generally want to accept any pending changes that appear to be legitimate edits and are not blatant vandalism or disruption, and reject edits that are problematic or that you wouldn't accept yourself.
• Never accept any pending changes that contain obvious and clear
  BLP
  violations.

Useful guidelines and pages for you to read:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline and tutorial on using the rights and reviewing pending changes.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, a summary of pending changes protection, the pending changes user right, and how it applies.
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy section on pending changes protection and its appropriate application and use by administrators.

I'm sure you'll do fine with the reviewer rights - it's a pretty straight-forward tool and it doesn't drastically change the interface that you're used to already. Nonetheless, please don't hesitate to leave me a message on my user talk page if you run into any questions, get stuck anywhere, or if you're not sure if you should accept or revert pending changes to a page, and I'll be more than be happy to help you. If you no longer want the pending changes reviewer rights, let me know and I'll be happy to remove it for you. Thank you for helping to patrol recent changes and keep Wikipedia free of disruption and vandalism - it's a very thankless job to perform and I want you to know that it doesn't go unnoticed and that I appreciate it very much. Happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:18, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

I don't know if my information is wrong or right, since you said it was wrong. I looked up numerous reviews, positive it was. Percy Jackson's movie had negative reviews, while mostly all reviews for Pirates of the Caribbean were positive. If I overlooked something, please tell me, or change it back. I hope I made it clear I'm sorry. Thank you. Denketchler (talk) 08:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Mixed is actually sourced, like Pirates 2, recieved mixed reviews, as sourced. Chompy Ace 22:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Just wanted to let you know, I've seen many of your edit fixing links and such at

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Furious 7, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Morgan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi there. Quick question: Why have you added this hidden text to the note? I don't take issue with the addition per se, but I am wary that it might cause confusion (like it is for me). ---- JascaDucato (talk | contributions) 12:11, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

That is used as the continuation of

I'm sorry, even your response here is confusing me. I'm afraid I'm goingt to have to remove the hidden message in the note as it is overcomplicating matters. ---- JascaDucato (talk | contributions) 01:59, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

You edited

I noticed a couple of things about your contributions on this particular page:

• you are editing this GA Review but not signing your posts
• I'm pretty sure there is only supposed to be one Reviewer at a time doing a GA Review. By not signing your posts you are, in effect, co-mingling your contributions with another editor's contributions. Perhaps I missed it but I don't see a call for a 2nd opinion or a notice that another Reviewer is taking over the Review or whatever?...

Would like some clarification please. Thanks, Shearonink (talk)

Done signing posts, and i was helping to improve the article Robin Hood (2010 film) with User:Rusted AutoParts. Chompy Ace 06:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Ah ok...couldn't tell if you were reviewing /or/ improving the article. Shearonink (talk) 06:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Congrats dude! The article you were working on, " Good Article criteria, becoming a good article on December 5, 2020. Great job on the improvements! For your hard work, I award you this image of a cute cat. Enjoy! wanna talk? 02:32, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Astro Boy (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I've noticed several of your recent edit summaries contain links to seemingly unrelated pages and I was just wondering if there was an explanation for that? Some of the links have left me extremely confused and curious so I figured there was no harm in asking! - Purplewowies (talk) 03:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thanks for helping out with the 2 Hours Doing Nothing GA nomination whilst I was inactive due to time difference reasons. It really means a lot. GeraldWL 09:41, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi Chompy Ace, what on Earth was going on with this series of edits? For example the perfectly ordinary and not broken: "...Builders, who are unimpressed with Emmet and refuse to fight Business," you broke four times:

"...Builders, unimpress at Emmet and refuse to fight Business
"...Builders, who cause unimpression to Emmet and refusal to fight Business
"...Builders, who cause unimpression with Emmet and refusal to fight Business"
"...Builders, who cause unimpressiveness with Emmet and refusal to fight Business"

...all of which are manifestly incorrect at a glance. Your strengths may lie in other areas but, if this is representative, writing prose for Wikipedia is not the best use of your skills.. Captainllama (talk) 21:17, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

P.S. Incidentally, you have put the "Semi-Retired" notice here on your page on 30 November, yet have made over 2000 edits since - a similar rate to the previous month and an increase on the previous year. Although there are no rules about what level of editing constitutes semi-retirement I am confident it is not an appropriate claim for an editor who is more active than they were before.

	The Ways of The Arrow
	I would like to thank you for helping Robin Hood (2010 film) to improve to GA standards, thanks for existing. Editoneer (talk) 20:21, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Congrats dude! The article you were working on, Good Article criteria, becoming a good article on December 31, 2020. Great job on the improvements! For your hard work, I award you this image of a bird. Enjoy! wanna talk? 01:05, 31 December 2020 (UTC)