User talk:Chrismaster1

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Permission or not, Wikipedia requires a copyright tag and proper fair-use rationale on every fair-use image uploaded to Wikipedia, or it will be deleted no matter what. I'll let you off with a warning by putting in the rationale for you, but in the meantime: You MUST put in fair-use rationale specific to EACH specific instance of the image in an article. You got that? As long as it gives a rationale of sorts, there are many ways to do it, but as long as you DO IT. No matter what. ViperSnake151 21:49, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

edit: Oh yeah, I did the WMGT one too for ya, just cause I'm nice, but I'm sifting through EVERY Wikipedia article I can find. Fair-Use images with no citations WILL be deleted.

I couldn't let your rather uncivil remark about the spelling go by without comment. I made the spelling mistake and missed it in posting the prod, It is generally considered that schools are not notable until there is something associated with them that asserts that notability. However, you chose to remove the prod and I will give you the benefit of the doubt. Have a good day. Happy editing!--Stormbay 18:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:06, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

I replied at my talk. --ST47Talk·Desk 20:43, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Several page edits with no summaries. You should provide them especially when you are undoing other peoples edits. Rjd0060 22:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are incorrect. As per Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines, "The purpose of a Wikipedia talk page is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or project page.". There is even a template at the top of the page, which says the same thing. And as far as leaving "threatening messages" on your page, I would never have done it if there was no reason to. (Cross posted) - Rjd0060 22:21, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You say that you are the moderator of the above-linked page. It is nice that someone is watching it, school articles can attract a lot of

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:22, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

talk) 20:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Re:Becoming an admin

You need to make a request on

WP:RFA where people will discuss/vote on whether you can be trusted with the tools. Note that typical admin candidates have more than 3000 edits to Wikipedia and a few months with a consistent level of activity. Mr.Z-man 01:33, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

You can use this tool, which will count all of your non-deleted edits broken down by namespace, pages, and edit summary usage. Or you can see your count including deleted pages in your preferences. Mr.Z-man 21:41, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Adminship

You still have fewer than 200 edits on the project. Most people who pass RFA have at least a few thousand. Mr.Z-man 20:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: DELETION OF THE CHUCK LEONARD PAGE

The article was Proposed for Deletion on May 16. The page was tagged at that time. Since nobody contested the deletion, and removed the tag, the article was deleted 5 days later on May 21. See

WP:AFD. - Rjd0060 (talk) 21:47, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I've restored those 2 articles. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:22, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK

In my situation, not becoming an admin was a blessing in disguise. Good luck to you, though. Lambertman (talk) 22:43, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NEED HELP!!!

How did you get your page looking so cool? I need help please! Please respond at my talk page when you get a chance. Thank you! --Chrismaster1 (talk) 20:35, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to respond to this when i read this a few days ago, but since i was busy back then i postponed it and kind of forgot to react, sorry about that. As for your question, the wikipedia userpage is in fact much similar to a website as it accepts HTML syntax. To make a user page look cool, is simply a matter of coding a normal HTML page, and then using it as your own user page.

If you want a cool looking userpage, there are a few options available. The first one is obvious: You can create a userpage by simply making a webpage yourself, or asking someone else to do it for you. It does require some time investment and a bit of coding skills to get something up and running (I spend about 11 hours on mine last year). It is not hard o do so, but if your not familiar with it HTML it can take some time to learn. An excellent head start can be found at

The user page design center

.

A second option is simply copying over an existing userpage from another user, and then changing any links to your own. Generally this is much faster and much easier, but your userpage lacks a personal feel of course. For that matter i am allowing everyone who wants to copy the templates i designed over and modify them for their own use, as long as the little bottom bar that says "Omega Purple Template - Excirial 2007" stays in tact. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 22:26, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Barker

I note you chose to believe the anon editor who provided no proof (and deleted my message stating as such). I just want you to know that you'll need to be more careful if you want to be an admin. It's easy to believe someone if they say what you are wanting to hear... but you always should hold out for concrete proof. "I heard that" or "My friend heard that" doesn't cut it - who did they hear it from? Is that person credible? And can they solidly back it up? Anyone can claim anything on the internet. Good luck! Lambertman (talk) 14:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Chrismaster1. You have new messages at Dcheagle's talk page.
Message added 01:51, 4 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WMAZ-13.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

talk / contribs 04:16, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

U notice you are just now noticing this after about 4 or 5 years after uploading it. Good job. Not. Chrismaster1 (talk) 05:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notable on-air staff

I have removed the staff and former staff that is/was not notable. In order for lists of people be included, they must meet the criteria listed at

here

. A list of previous discussions are listed below:

• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Stations/Archive 9#Arguments for Excluding "Where Are They Now?"
• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Stations/Archive 10#Current on-air staff list discussion
• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Stations/Archive 9#Alumni (and current staff) Lists

If you read the talk page, I responded. Also, you will be out numbered on this. I will bring it up to others who are doing the same as I am. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 19:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I understand about it not being a directory but if you are going to list Bill Shanks as "notable" then you might as well list all the others that are currently at the station. I mean seriously, I work with Bill Shanks and in all honesty, you can walk up to anybody here in the Central Georgia area, mention his name and people will look at you with a blank stare and not know who he is. Notable? I don't think so. Also "Also you will be outnumbered on this. I will bring it up to others who are doing the same as I am." is that a threat or a promise? It seems like a threat to me. --Chrismaster1 (talk) 19:15, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a threat, I'm just letting you know that others will tell you the same thing as I am... meaning you'll be outnumbered. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 19:56, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Former staff members can be on there, as long as they are notable; that is why they were still there. I think you are either misunderstanding what I'm saying and what the articles are saying, or you're just mad that they can't be on here and so you are removing them all. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 20:04, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Chrismaster1. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Chrismaster1. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Chrismaster1. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

talk) 10:46, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]