User talk:ChulaUniversitySoph2020

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 10:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dreamy Jazz! Thank you so much for inviting me! I just posted a question there and will keep reading! You're the best! Hope I can get better at this!

ChulaUniversitySoph2020 (talk) 10:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! ChulaUniversitySoph2020, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 10:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vincent60030 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help

). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

A lot of primary sources. Please consider adding reliable secondary sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Harald Link
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

VKZY^LUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 15:08, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:

This submission appears to

independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Stuff like "tireless work" makes it read like a hagiography.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Harald Link
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 15:46, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by RoySmith was: This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not the place to post your personal resume.

-- RoySmith (talk) 14:25, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It appears another user has created the article Harald Link based on your draft. I'm sorry to hear of the experience you had. It's unfortunately often the case that AfC submissions are declined or rejected, despite them being adequately written and sourced. I hope this doesn't dissuade you from further contributing to the project. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:56, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]